July 2006 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: Deployment order of dependent process definitions

by kukeltje

hey, you brought it up yourself ;-) It could ofcourse be left until runtime, but then the parent process won't run since the subprocess is not there. You have to react to that as well. IMO you do not want runtime errors because of this and thus want to have all processes deployed when you start some new instance. A CMDB would be great for this, either way right? Or do I mis something? If it is just the order, you could create a small ant script that deploys all the relevant processes in the correct order. This ant script could probably be generated from the CMDB. We try to automate as much of this as possible to prevent errors, deploy time or runtime View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3956918#3956918 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3956918

20 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossCache] - Re: No local transaction...

by manik.surtani＠jboss.com

Yes - this has to do with a network timing thing where the remote node receives a rollback (for some reason) before it has received the prepare (1PC since you are using ASYNC). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3956917#3956917 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3956917

20 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossCache] - Re: JBoss Cache Error

by manik.surtani＠jboss.com

have you referred to the examples in http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JBossCacheAndWebLogic View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3956916#3956916 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3956916

20 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: Deployment order of dependent process definitions

by sgodden

OK - forget consultants or not consultants - it is not the point. The point is - are we expected to remember the deployment order of process definitions. This seems unworkable in a complex scenario, no matter who handles the deployment. Why can sub-process definition resolution not be left until runtime? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3956915#3956915 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3956915

20 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossCache] - Re: Global caching

by manik.surtani＠jboss.com

Yes, there may be a bug in the lifecycle methods of the TcpCacheServer - but this should not stop it from normal operations, of acting as a far cache. Are the other nodes in the cluster able to speak to this Tcp Cache server? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3956914#3956914 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3956914

20 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[EJB 3.0] - Problems about EJB3

by Seto

While I'm reading Enterprise JavaBeans 3.0, 5th Edition, Oreilly, I found the code that entityManager.create(cust). But I can't find the create method in the javadoc. Can someone explain it for me? Is it the difference in versions? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3956913#3956913 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3956913

20 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: Example uses superstate

by kukeltje

hmmm.... funny, that document is behind the second result google gave me when using the words "superstate jbpm docs" in the query. Would that be a coincidence David? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3956911#3956911 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3956911

20 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: Deployment order of dependent process definitions

by kukeltje

One 'wrong' end of the stick (maybe I should say 'other' although not many sticks have two 'useful' ends ;-) ) is anonymous wrote : I can't see how this will be workable in a moderately complex scenario where consultants are able to modify and re-upload process definitions. IMHO (and Toms' and many others), consultants are not the ones to deploy things. Read Tom's blogs to see what the point of view of jBPM is. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3956910#3956910 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3956910

20 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossWS] - Soap Attachments problem with JBossAS 4.0.3

by pcarvalho

Hello, I'm using JBoss 4.0.3 in order to deploy a WS with attachments. I've tried the step by step process available in the web site but still have problems when deploying on JBoss (under the SunApp Server, all works fine). Is it possible to use the -f:datahandleronly argument of the wscompile tool in order to deploy the SAAJ WS? What's the difference between the base64Binary generated with this option and the hexBinary added by hand in the tutorial? Are these two data types supported by JBossAS 4.0.3? Is there a sample zip file working good anywhere? (a war to deploy directly and wrking), or has anybody any good sample, explained properly with the config files associated with? Thanks. Phil. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3956909#3956909 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3956909

20 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Installation, Configuration & Deployment] - Re: How to deploy a connector in an ear file

by DanSalt

Hi, Yes, it is possible. I deploy one EAR file containing everything. Put the DS file in the root of the RAR file. Then in the DS file, you need to use specify the RAR file as [EAR_FILE]#[RAR_FILE]. <rar-name>JcaAdapter.rar</rar-name> with <rar-name>JcaLaucher_EAR.ear#JcaAdapter.rar</rar-name> (assuming your EAR file is called JcaLaucher_EAR.ear, edit if not) Hope that helps, Cheers, Dan View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3956908#3956908 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3956908

20 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user July 2006