November 2006 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[Messaging, JMS & JBossMQ] - How to publish a message to a certain subsciber?

by bluesky999

(All I need is to repost message from DLQ. ) So when repost message from DLQ to the original topic, can I publish it to a certain subscriber? If yes, how to do it? Many thanks. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3989918#3989918 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3989918

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Seam generate-entities failing

by gavin.king＠jboss.com

You can't reverse engineer tables that don't have primary keys. You should not have tables w/o primary keys anyway. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3989917#3989917 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3989917

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Excessive [could not destroy component] 1.1B1 to 1.1CR1

by gavin.king＠jboss.com

Increase your SFSB timeout to be slightly longer than the HttpSession timeout. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3989916#3989916 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3989916

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossCache] - Re: Associating multiple keys with same object without stori

by haribaasha

yep, the reference is only stored, but i am also writing it to file, cant do anything there, just have to write it twice.. thanks guys hari View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3989914#3989914 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3989914

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossCache] - Re: Associating multiple keys with same object without stori

by genman

I believe the Pojo cache takes care of the referencing issues? So, you should only have a single copy of the object persisted. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3989913#3989913 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3989913

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossCache] - Re: Updating the data model for a distributed cache

by genman

I believe the answer is yes, if Java on cache 1 can deserialize the value from cache 2. It's almost trivial to experiment yourself. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3989912#3989912 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3989912

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Excessive [could not destroy component] 1.1B1 to 1.1CR1

by rdewell

We've been running Seam in production for many months now. During that time we've VERY intermittently seen the Seam warning "Could not destroy component" in the logs. Due to its low occurrence and seemingly benign nature, we've ignored it. After the upgrade to CR1, however, we're receiving these warnings almost constantly. Specifically, it appears to be isolated to Stateful Session scoped components, however that is an initial sampling. There doesn't appear to be a Session or component that isn't effected. Anything that could have changed between b1 and cr1 that could have caused this drastic increase...? We're on 4.0.5. Ryan | 2006-11-30 02:52:03,664 WARN [org.jboss.seam.contexts.Contexts] Could not destroy component: OrderSession | javax.ejb.EJBNoSuchObjectException: Could not find Stateful bean: 41z4l26-wb41k6-ev4j007b-1-ev4jirql-bw | at org.jboss.ejb3.cache.simple.SimpleStatefulCache.get(SimpleStatefulCache.java:268) | at org.jboss.ejb3.stateful.StatefulRemoveInterceptor.removeSession(StatefulRemoveInterceptor.java:127) | at org.jboss.ejb3.stateful.StatefulRemoveInterceptor.invoke(StatefulRemoveInterceptor.java:87) | at org.jboss.aop.joinpoint.MethodInvocation.invokeNext(MethodInvocation.java:101) | at org.jboss.aspects.security.AuthenticationInterceptor.invoke(AuthenticationInterceptor.java:77) | at org.jboss.ejb3.security.Ejb3AuthenticationInterceptor.invoke(Ejb3AuthenticationInterceptor.java:131) | at org.jboss.aop.joinpoint.MethodInvocation.invokeNext(MethodInvocation.java:101) | at org.jboss.ejb3.ENCPropagationInterceptor.invoke(ENCPropagationInterceptor.java:47) | at org.jboss.aop.joinpoint.MethodInvocation.invokeNext(MethodInvocation.java:101) | at org.jboss.ejb3.asynchronous.AsynchronousInterceptor.invoke(AsynchronousInterceptor.java:106) | at org.jboss.aop.joinpoint.MethodInvocation.invokeNext(MethodInvocation.java:101) | at org.jboss.ejb3.stateful.StatefulContainer.localInvoke(StatefulContainer.java:203) | at org.jboss.ejb3.stateful.StatefulLocalProxy.invoke(StatefulLocalProxy.java:98) | at $Proxy219.destroy(Unknown Source) | at x.x.OrderSession$$FastClassByCGLIB$$e5185c52.invoke(<generated>) | at net.sf.cglib.proxy.MethodProxy.invoke(MethodProxy.java:149) | at org.jboss.seam.intercept.RootInvocationContext.proceed(RootInvocationContext.java:45) | at org.jboss.seam.intercept.ClientSideInterceptor$1.proceed(ClientSideInterceptor.java:69) | at org.jboss.seam.intercept.SeamInvocationContext.proceed(SeamInvocationContext.java:55) | at org.jboss.seam.interceptors.RemoveInterceptor.removeIfNecessary(RemoveInterceptor.java:39) | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3989911#3989911 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3989911

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Messaging, JMS & JBossMQ] - Re: connectionFactoryJndiName config property

by weston.price＠jboss.com

The most important configuration piece in the puzzle is the destination name in your activation config. This *has* to point to the physical queue name on ActiveMQ, not the JNDI name. This has been known to trip people up. Also, while ActiveMQ does support dynamic Queue/Topic creation via JNDI, this probably won't work in this scnenario being that the MDB is bound to a particular destination at deployment time. I could be wrong on this one, ActiveMQ very well may create a destination when one is unknown (like JBossMQ), but I would have to verify this. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3989910#3989910 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3989910

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Messaging, JMS & JBossMQ] - Re: connectionFactoryJndiName config property

by weston.price＠jboss.com

Shouldn't be an issue. You just need to set the appropriate annotations. The EJB3 MDB container will just pass them along to the ActiveMQ Activation spec. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3989909#3989909 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3989909

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Messaging, JMS & JBossMQ] - Re: connectionFactoryJndiName config property

by tobinibot

One thing I noticed was that the examples all seem to be using EJB2. We're using EJB3, so I'll have to convert the examples, but I'm hoping that's a fairly trivial process. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3989908#3989908 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3989908

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user November 2006