November 2006 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss Seam] - Re: How to impliment a Paged + Sorted DataTable (session) wi

by norman.richards＠jboss.com

Maybe you could try a page action to refresh the data? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3986327#3986327 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3986327

19 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[EJB 3.0] - Re: query.getResultList(); <= contains the same instance X t

by fbadt

Turns out what was thought to be the PK column was not. A PK on a sequence table was created and the former "pk" was used to group results on a common value. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3986326#3986326 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3986326

19 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JNDI/Naming/Network] - Re: JNDI Newbie - Please help !!!

by mrroger

Thanks Peter. Thanks Jerry It was a misconfiguration in my Eclipse (using another JVM installed !!!). Very good. Thank a lot !! Giovanni View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3986325#3986325 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3986325

19 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[EJB 3.0] - Re: query.getResultList(); <= contains the same instance X t

by jblackmore

Do you have any collections on that entity? Are you using EJBQL with joins? I think I stumbled over a related scenario, except I'm calling 'getSingleResult' and getting an exception that there are 6 or 8 or 124 elements. No code or queries or even data changed since 4.0.4 in my case, and this just started happening after moving to 4.0.5. I think the problem is that there may be only one instance of TABLE1 but 10 of some mapped OneToMany collection of your entity. I used a SortedSet instead of the default List (generated by Hibernate tools) to eliminate dups in 4.0.4, but that approach doesn't seem to do the trick any more. The other thing you can do is wrap the result list with a LinkedHashSet, to eliminate dups and preserve the order. It occurs to me that this is all part of the "paradigm mismatch", but I feel like I shouldn't have to do that, Hibernate should. But it works. Please see this post for my "fix" that got me from 4.0.2 to 4.0.4, but now I have to go back into every EJBQL query invoked throughout the system and wrap it with a LinkedHashSet. Sigh, job security. :-) /index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=82946&start=10 Anyone know a better solution? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3986322#3986322 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3986322

19 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Portal] - Failed to create instance of Portlet.

by mohamed.rafi

Hi, I am trying to install a new portlet into the JBoss Portal. However, when I try to deploy it, I get the following error: | 14:05:48,123 WARN [PortletAppDeployment] Failed to create instance TestRafiPortletInstance of portlet /testrafiportlet.TestRafiPortlet because portlet /testrafiportlet.TestRafiPortlet is not available | 14:05:48,372 INFO [Http11BaseProtocol] Starting Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-0.0.0.0-8080 | Following are the descriptor files and their contents which I have used. portlet-instances.xml | <deployments> | <deployment> | | <instance> | <instance-id>TestRafiPortletInstance</instance-id> | <portlet-ref>TestRafiPortlet</portlet-ref> | </instance> | </deployment> | </deployments> | | portlet.xml | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> | <portlet-app xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/portlet/portlet-app_1_0.xsd" | xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" | xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/portlet/portlet-app_1_0.xsd http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/portlet/portlet-app_1_0.xsd" | version="1.0"> | <portlet> | <portlet-name>TestRafiPortlet</portlet-name> | <portlet-class>com.apple.TestRafiPortlet</portlet-class> | <supports> | <mime-type>text/html</mime-type> | <portlet-mode>VIEW</portlet-mode> | </supports> | <portlet-info> | <title>Test Rafi Portlet</title> | </portlet-info> | </portlet> | </portlet-app> | | testrafi-object.xml | <deployments> | <deployment> | <if-exists>overwrite</if-exists> | <parent-ref>default.default</parent-ref> | <window> | <window-name>TestRafiPortletWindow</window-name> | <instance-ref>TestRafiPortletInstance</instance-ref> | <region>center</region> | <height>1</height> | </window> | </deployment> | </deployments> | The exception which is getting thrown is: | 14:05:47,307 INFO [TomcatDeployer] deploy, ctxPath=/testrafiportlet, warUrl=.../deploy/testrafiportlet.war/ | 14:05:48,024 ERROR [AbstractKernelController] Error installing to Start: name=portal:container=Portlet,id=/testrafiportlet.TestRafiPortlet state=Create | org.jboss.portal.portlet.container.PortletInitializationException: The portlet TestRafiPortlet threw a runtime exception during init | at org.jboss.portal.portlet.container.PortletContainer.start(PortletContainer.java:287) | ... | ... | 14:05:48,123 WARN [PortletAppDeployment] Failed to create instance TestRafiPortletInstance of portlet /testrafiportlet.TestRafiPortlet because portlet /testrafiportlet.TestRafiPortlet is not available | 14:05:48,372 INFO [Http11BaseProtocol] Starting Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-0.0.0.0-8080 | | Any ideas on what am I missing here, and how to get it fixed? Regards Rafi SM View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3986321#3986321 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3986321

19 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Installation, Configuration & Deployment] - Ear deployer and CallByValue

by asack

If I have an EAR with multiple EJB3 modules in it, and call by value is set, does that mean every call is marshalled or does that only apply to communcation between two different isolated EARs? My understanding is its the latter. That modules within the same isolated EAR are local calls. Thanks! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3986320#3986320 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3986320

19 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[EJB 3.0] - Re: JBoss Unified ClassLoader Hell? even with EJB3 ?

by RikardF

Did you try to set "CallByValue" and "Isolated" to true in ear-deployer.xml? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3986319#3986319 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3986319

19 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: PhaseListener as Seam Component

by gavin.king＠jboss.com

nope, this is not possible View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3986318#3986318 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3986318

19 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: How do I deal with exceptions when using the SAF?

by gavin.king＠jboss.com

You can do stuff like: public String persist() | { | if ( ..... ) { | return super.persist(); | } | else { | FacesMessages.instance().add("can't persist"); | return null; | } | } Is that OK? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3986317#3986317 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3986317

19 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: How to impliment a Paged + Sorted DataTable (session) wi

by antispart

petemuir, thanks for the suggestion. You're right that #2 is the way to go, but I've tried that and got this exception: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: @DataModel scope must be ScopeType.UNSPECIFIED or ScopeType.PAGE: If I could @DataModel(scope=ScopeType.EVENT) and If that means that this list would be refreshed (the factory method called) on every new event then that'd be perfect. I actually tried outjecting a List (instead of DataModel) to get around this issue but I found that while the list would be refreshed everytime I hit "search" (as it always did) it would still not be refreshed on subsequent page loads. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3986315#3986315 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3986315

19 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user November 2006