November 2006 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

by ellenzhao

Thanks for the links! I had a look at the site and am really impressed by the performance! Since there is neither too much CPU load nor "out of memory" problem under such stress, your application must handle objects really well. Congratulations! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3989545#3989545 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3989545

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss AOP] - annotation-introduction + aspect oriented annotations

by fabiocsilva

I would like to use the feature "annotation-introduction" to introduce annotation in constructors and to capture them in "bind". For example: | | <annotation-introduction expr="constructor(gui.complaints.*->new())"> | @util.SystemRecord | </annotation-introduction> | | <bind pointcut="call((a)util.SystemRecord->new(..))"> | <interceptor class="aspects.SystemRecordInterceptor"/> | </bind> | | But 1 - The form @util.SystemRecord->new (..) to mark the constructors it is not executing, only the form *->@util.SystemRecord (..) 2 - The form *->@util.SystemRecord (..) it seems not to be affected by annotation-introduction How to make these features to work together? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3989542#3989542 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3989542

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[EJB 3.0] - Re: reentrant annotation?

by ALRubinger

If I remember correctly... Entity Beans could be marked as "reentrant". Session Beans did not require a "reentrant" marking because if Stateless, the container would return another separate instance, and Stateful was prohibited (as it is now)... EJB 2.1 Spec, Final Draft, 7.12.10: anonymous wrote : The container must ensure that only one thread can be executing an instance at any time. If a client | request arrives for an instance while the instance is executing another request, the container may throw | the java.rmi.RemoteException to the second request if the client is a remote client, or the | javax.ejb.EJBException if the client is a local client.[9] | | Note that a session object is intended to support only a single client. Therefore, it would be an | application error if two clients attempted to invoke the same session object. | | One implication of this rule is that an application cannot make loopback calls to a session bean instance. S, ALR View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3989541#3989541 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3989541

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Security & JAAS/JBoss] - Re: Federation in JBOSSsso

by sohil.shah＠jboss.com

Here is the JIRA bug report for tracking this: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSSO-20 Thanks Sohil View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3989540#3989540 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3989540

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[EJB 3.0] - Re: external configuration for service beans

by jahlborn

i'm now running 4.0.5, and i was still required to use the ejb-name, management, ejb-class, and remote elements, even though the bean is fully annotated. however, that doesn't really help, as there is nothing really of use in that descriptor for the service bean anyway (unless i'm missing something). there are no env entries, and there are no properties settings. i'm still trying to figure out if i can make use of the resource-ref and resource-env-ref elements, but they seem convoluted at best. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3989539#3989539 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3989539

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Seam app on slashdot

by cwash

"ellenzhao" wrote : i got a 404....could you please fix the link? http://it.slashdot.org/it/06/11/28/2037237.shtml is the link to the story and http://www.10minutemail.com/ is the link to the app. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3989538#3989538 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3989538

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Seam app on slashdot

by modoc

This url should work: http://www.10minutemail.com It's holding up better than I expected. It's a little slow at the moment, but hasn't fallen over. I was taken by surprise by the slashdot article, but so far it's working out well. I'm not sure where the slowness is coming from, my bandwidth and cpu are both pretty under-utilized, then again I haven't tuned JBoss or Apache for this type of load, as I wasn't expecting any publicity at all. I finally found and fixed the timer issue i was having, so things are running well for now. It's actually pretty impressive how well an out of the box install of jboss, and a first time seam developer's first app, can handle a slashdotting, following a tech.yahoo.com-dotting, following a digg.com-dotting. My hat is off to Seam and JBoss. Modoc/Devon View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3989536#3989536 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3989536

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Security & JAAS/JBoss] - Re: Federation in JBOSSsso

by sohil.shah＠jboss.com

anonymous wrote : | #1.) Does it support SAML 1.0/1.1 and 2.0? | Currently it is SAML 1.1 supported. But we are working towards making it SAML 2.0 compliant ASAP anonymous wrote : | #2.) Does it also support the browser-based POST method (for Federation). | Yes, this should be supported. However, I just looked at the code to make sure and there seems to be a small bug with this. I will try to fix this in the next Beta Update so this is feature is supported Thanks Sohil View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3989535#3989535 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3989535

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Security & JAAS/JBoss] - Federation in JBOSSsso

by sullyseatte

Hello all! I just have a couple quick questions regarding the JBOSSsso product/framework. #1.) Does it support SAML 1.0/1.1 and 2.0? #2.) Does it also support the browser-based POST method (for Federation). Thanks much! :-) --J View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3989533#3989533 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3989533

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss AOP] - Re: Tracing/Logging - Actual RMI calls vs calls between EJBs

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

You can't if you use "execution" or "field" pointcuts, if you want access to the caller you need a "call" pointcut, but those have certain limitations. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3989532#3989532 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3989532

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user November 2006