November 2006 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss AOP] - Re: Aspect scope and construction pointcuts

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

I think it is a bug http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAOP-303 Correct on the execution pointcut, but construction should work. Looking at the code it is pretty straightforward - I should have a fix in cvs in a few minuts View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3982627#3982627 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3982627

19 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: [b][u]how to deploy ear file in JBOSS application server

by kukeltje

wrong forum View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3982625#3982625 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3982625

19 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: Is there any method to store information in process defi

by kukeltje

(ab)using the description field is imo much, much worse than each instance keeping a variable. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3982623#3982623 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3982623

19 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: How to save process instance into database?

by kukeltje

anonymous wrote : And I know if i call "jbpmContext.close()" explicitly, it was saved. | Has there any other ways to do that? | No View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3982622#3982622 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3982622

19 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss AOP] - Re: Aspect scope and construction pointcuts

by stalep

hi, ive tested your example and i get the same error. i can see that it matches the pointcut and the generated code looks correct. so if im not mistaken ill call this a bug. i tried to change the pointcut to: @Aspect(scope=Scope.PER_INSTANCE) | public class MyAspect { | @Bind (pointcut="execution(public MyAspected->new())") | public Object construction(Invocation invocation) throws Throwable { ... } | } - but that wont work either. it wont produce an error, but since the pointcut is created for each new object, and the object hasnt been created yet i guess it just ignores it. but this should work when using construction since thats on the callerside. lets see what kabir thinks, but in my ignorance im calling it a bug :) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3982621#3982621 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3982621

19 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossWS] - Re: Return value for Java bean always empty

by lowecg2004

Oh (expletive deleted). It was so obvious - I'd been looking at it for so long that I completely missed the basics! Thanks for you help, Chris. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3982620#3982620 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3982620

19 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossCache] - Re: probable bug discovered --- failure acquiring lock

by indrit

We are using the jboss cache as a CAS's ticket repository. Actually a granting ticket (CAS entity) is created when a user logins on our site, and this ticket must be propagated to the other application server on the cluster. On user logoff the ticket is destroyed. The problem happened on a test environment so there was little traffic and low load average. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3982619#3982619 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3982619

19 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Installation, Configuration & Deployment] - Running a minimal configuration with just a tx manager and s

by sateh

Is it possible to run a minimal configuration with just the transaction manager and sar deployer? I need something really small to deploy a tiny app in that just requires a transaction manager and is packages as a .sar. Is something like that possible? S. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3982618#3982618 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3982618

19 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Security & JAAS/JBoss] - custom timedCacheFactory problem

by lost_traveller

We have a problem whereby a user is logged out after 30 minutes and JBoss attempts to re-login, since we use a custom Principal which contains a session id the session id is lost. The reason a user logs out after 30 minutes is because in jboss-service.xml DefaultCacheTimeout is set to 1800 seconds. What we would like is not to specify a time but to allow a users timeout to be refreshed each time a secure method is called, which is possible because org.jboss.util.TimedCachePolicy contains a refersh() method, which is currently hard-coded to return false. So what we have done is extend TimedCachePolicy and override refresh() to refresh the timeout: | public class TimedRefreshCachePolicy extends TimedCachePolicy implements Serializable | { | | /** | * @see org.jboss.util.TimedCachePolicy#insert(java.lang.Object, java.lang.Object) | */ | @Override | public void insert(Object key, Object value) | { | super.insert(key, new RefreshTimedEntry(getDefaultLifetime(), value)); | } | | /** | * The default implementation of TimedEntry used to wrap non-TimedEntry objects inserted into the | * cache. | */ | static class RefreshTimedEntry implements TimedEntry, Serializable | { | | private long expirationTime = -1; | | private Object value = null; | | private long lifetime = -1; | | RefreshTimedEntry(final long lifetime, final Object value) | { | this.expirationTime = 1000 * lifetime; | this.value = value; | this.lifetime = lifetime; | } | | public void init(long now) | { | expirationTime += now; | } | | public boolean isCurrent(long now) | { | return expirationTime > now; | } | | public boolean refresh() | { | // this is called to refresh the time since the last call to this item in the | // cache, return true to indicate that a refresh took place and that the item | // is still valid | expirationTime = System.currentTimeMillis() + (1000 * lifetime); | return true; | } | | public void destroy() | { | } | | public Object getValue() | { | return value; | } | } | | } According to chapter 8 we can configure our own cache policy: anonymous wrote : This is done by appending the name of the security domain to this name when looking up the CachePolicy for a domain We have create an MBean to bind TimedRefreshCachePolicy to our security domain: | public class PetStoreService extends ServiceMBeanSupport implements PetStoreServiceMBean | { | ...... | new InitialContext().bind("java:/timedCacheFactory/petstore", Class.forName("com.foo.TimedRefreshCachePolicy").newInstance()); | | Object obj0 = new InitialContext().lookup("java:/timedCacheFactory"); | Object obj1 = new InitialContext().lookup("java:/timedCacheFactory/petstore"); | Object obj3 = new InitialContext().lookup("java:/timedCacheFactory/sdmfhsjhdfcnb"); | .... | } | The problem is TimedRefreshCachePolicy won't bind to java:/timedCacheFactory/petstore in fact we can insert any text after java:/timedCacheFactory and it will return a TimedCachePolicy, from the code above: obj0 returns some proxy obj1 returns a TimedCachePolicy obj2 returns a TimedCachePolicy So how do I bind my TimedRefreshCachePolicy to java:/timedCacheFactory/petstore? or have we got this wrong and implemented it in the wrong way? We would preferably like a CachePolicy on a per domain basis, without having to change any JBoss configuration. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3982617#3982617 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3982617

19 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossCache] - Re: probable bug discovered --- failure acquiring lock

by indrit

thanks for answering! It happened sistematically until I restarted the application server where the error occurred. It seemed to me that for some reason a previews lock wasn't released, may be some exception was the cause. What do you think? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3982615#3982615 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3982615

19 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user November 2006