[JBoss Seam] - [OT] Seam and Tomahawk - lost property?
by imario
Hi!
I wonder about the style used in this forum when it comes to posts where user complain about the interoperability between Seam and Tomahawk.
In the past we (I) tried some stuff in Tomahawk-sandbox which might have had some influence with Seam, but this has been fixed (as far as I know).
Tomahawk itself do nothing strange with e.g. the Lifecycle, at least as far as I am aware.
A sandbox is always a dangerous thing.
Maybe there are better looking/working JSF component libraries out there , but still, there is no reason to be this negative against Tomahawk and _force_ people to NOT use it.
So, instead of ranting around here, it would be great if you (the JBoss Seam Team) could give us a hint if something went wrong so that we can fix it, or, at least, document the incompatibilities so that users do not have to spent eons of time to figure out themself.
Maybe we should sign a contract with Jboss about the effort to make our techniques better compatible.
Just as everyone do with M$ these days.
Thanks!
Ciao,
Mario
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3993794#3993794
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3993794
19 years, 4 months
[JBossCache] - Buddy Replication and data consistency
by mica
Hi,
Some issues which are not clear for me after reading docs:
if I execute put(fqn, key, value, option) command with autogravity option concurrently on two distinct cache instances (let say put(key, val1) on cache1 and put(key, val2) on cache2)
1) with SYNC_REPL - invokes will be ordered and as a result i'll get consistent state of the cache (so either val1 on cache1 or val2 on cache2)
or i can get a CacheException (or sth more specific?) while from one or both puts?
2) with ASYNC_REPL - i can not get any exception and eventually at some point cache will achieve consistent state or sth else can happen (exception, inconsistent state)?
3) is there any difference in behaviour while using _INVALIDATE than _REPL in cas of buddy replication?
--
thanks in advance,
mj
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3993793#3993793
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3993793
19 years, 4 months
[EJB/JBoss] - Re: Scheduler vs. EJB Timer Service
by torf
Hi,
we call a SLSB from a org.jboss.varia.scheduler.Scheduler implementation, and our deployment goes like this:
deploy/applications/MyApp/ contains:
- MyApp-all.ear
- MyApp-api.jar
deploy-hasingleton/applications/MyApp/MyApp-timer-service.xml:
| <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
| <server>
| <classpath codebase="deploy/applications/MyApp" archives="MyApp-api.jar"/>
| <mbean code="org.jboss.varia.scheduler.Scheduler" name=":service=Scheduler,schedule=MyApp">
| <depends>jboss.j2ee:service=EARDeployment,url='MyApp-all.ear'</depends>
| <attribute name="StartAtStartup">true</attribute>
| <attribute name="SchedulableClass">our.company.framework.timer.TimedObjectSchedulableRemote</attribute>
| <attribute name="SchedulableArguments">ejb/MySchedulerTimer</attribute>
| <attribute name="SchedulableArgumentTypes">java.lang.String</attribute>
| <attribute name="InitialStartDate">0</attribute>
| <attribute name="SchedulePeriod">60000</attribute>
| <attribute name="InitialRepetitions">-1</attribute>
| </mbean>
| </server>
|
our.company.framework.timer.TimedObjectSchedulableRemote has a String-arg constructor which is invoked with argument "ejb/MySchedulerTimer". Its perform method looks up the remote home "ejb/MySchedulerTimer" in JNDI, reflectively invokes create(), and then (non-reflectively) the SLSB business method.
our.company.framework.timer.TimedObjectSchedulableRemote is contained in server/$SERVER_CONF/lib/our-framework.jar.
Regards,
Christoph
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3993792#3993792
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3993792
19 years, 4 months