We've found the source to this problem! It only appears because we let remoting traffic use http, port 80.
jboss-service.xml:
<attribute name="InvokerLocator">
| servlet://${jboss.bind.address}:80/servlet-invoker/ServerInvokerServlet</attribute>
| <attribute name="Configuration">
|
When changing back to socket transport everything works fine.
The problem is that we can't open up other ports easily in the firewalls between clients and servers.
Is this a feature or a bug?
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3971567#3971567
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3971567
I would also like someone to post a guide on how to develop an EJB3 project using the JBoss-Eclipse-IDE 1.6.
I have managed to create a project (set up the JBoss server, etc..) but I do not know how to set up the beans (deploy the simple Stateless and Entity beans) in order to test them using a small java app.
Any help would be appreciated.
I have a very simple application:
- one entity bean
- one stateless bean (which can create / retrieve the entity bean)
- one simple class to use the stateless bean and test its methods
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3971566#3971566
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3971566
I did get this working, but I had to back out the Seam jars from CVS, as I couldn't figure out how to avoid hitting the Seam "ExceptionInterceptor". I'm sure there's a simple way to define my interceptor to occur just before that one, but at the moment I'm content with Seam 1.0.1.
One question - how did the Seam ExceptionInterceptor class bypass my "catch" clause? In the "save()" method that I included above, the catch clause was never reached if I used the 9/10/2006 CVS jars. Instead, the Seam exception interceptor kicked in, even if I changed my catch to "Throwable". That is, I was single stepping through the code, and once I threw the null pointer with "user.toString()", it went straight to your interceptor!
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3971565#3971565
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3971565
Hiya ,
Yes, traditional tiers are a bit mixed.
You can have a "navigation tier" in a finder that is "data tier", like in booking example.
I am thinking much and i think that the architectural new solution is "Bijection based"
I am writing my finders and i inject in them presentation objects.
So my finders are "clean" and they still are "data tier"
And i have Presentation objects and pure business objects, like always.
So you can reuse your data tier components, place them in a separate project that generates only a .jar ( i am doing so ). You could create a complete .ear that will be a "data tier object server", but this solution should be well evaluated.
(Sorry for my English)
good work, Nicola
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3971563#3971563
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3971563
Hello
The answer is : not yet. It means that portal forums available now cannot be deployed as a standalone app. However, soon there will be a release of JBoss Forums 1.0.0Alpha which can be run as a standalone because their view is based on JSF. But few features available while deploying on portal will not be available on standalone for some time. Full compatibility with JBoss Portal is top priority and standalone is an additional thing. So, we will take care about those missing features later.
Best regards
------------------------
Ryszard Kozmik
JBoss Forums
JBoss Labs Team
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3971560#3971560
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3971560