Look at BPEL beta2 - point 3.4 ::
3.4. Getting the Eclipse BPEL designer
The Eclipse community has begun a BPEL project [http://www.eclipse.org/bpel/]. The goal of this project is "to
add comprehensive support to Eclipse for the definition, authoring, editing, deploying, testing and debugging of
WS-BPEL 2.0 processes".
The JBoss jBPM team has been in touch with the comitters of this project. Expect tighter integration between the
Eclipse Designer and jBPM BPEL shortly after key pieces of functionality such as Runtime Framework and Debug
become available.
You do not have to wait, tough. You can get started with the Eclipse BPEL designer and jBPM BPEL today!
Please visit our Wiki [http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JbpmBpelDesigner] knowledge base for a Quick
Start guide.
Maybe this will help you.
Greetings Claus
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3974119#3974119
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3974119
I discovered that when I restart the server and I have the MBean in the deploy folder, the MBean gets deployd right away without waiting for any depends to be deployed. What am I doing wrong? Here is the jboss-service.xml:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
| <server>
| <mbean code="concept.jmx.Checker" name="concept:jmx=concept.jmx.Checker">
| </mbean>
| <depends>
| jboss.j2ee:jar=concept.jar,name=EntityServiceBean,service=EJB3
| </depends>
| <depends>persistence.units:unitName=proof</depends>
| </server>
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3974118#3974118
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3974118
Hello,
The difference between remote interfaces and remote business interfaces is absolutely clear to me. I also understood that a remote interface must extend EJBObject while this is permitted for remote business interfaces (must not extend). The point was that with the annotation javax.ejb.Remote remote business interfaces are declared and not remote interfaces. I came to this conclusion by reading the chapter of the standard mentioned by you (4.6.6 and 4.6.7) as well as the API-specification regarding the annotation at http://java.sun.com/products/ejb/docs.html which is referenced from your site and belongs to the standard AFAIK. Therefore the implementation mentioned in my first posting would be not standard-compliant because it declares a remote business interface which implements EJBObject. Will this be changed in the near future?
Best regards,
Jens
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3974117#3974117
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3974117
hi
i am developing an ejb3 application with servlets and jsps in war and ejbs in a jar and all together packed in an ear.
my servlet access some thirdparty api and i am adding their jar files inside the war(WEB-INF/LIB).
session bean also access some third party jars and they are accessible from server/default/lib folder(so no need to include with application).
is there any way to access jars from server/default/lib folder for servlets also?
so that i can reduce the ear file size.
thanks in advance
jimmy
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3974112#3974112
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3974112
I investigated my problem with debugger. It is reusing on the same login-module (standard) in 2 web contexts (portal-server.war and myportal.war). It appeared that they are using the same instance of PortalAuthorizationManagerFactory and this object has some state injected by 1st context initialization (whatever you access first). So after that 2nd context doesn't go though all phases of role list initialization and therefore fails to authenticate with error 401.
Any ideas? Shall I submit it as a bug or it is me doing that wrong?
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3974111#3974111
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3974111