January 2007 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss and NetBeans] - Using Oracle in NetBeans 5.5

by rabbiaqaswar

Hello I am also trying to use Oracle with NetBeans 5.5. As you said I have copied the oracle-ds.xml file to the server\default\deploy directory. Created the Database Connection with the database and also Execute Command to see if i can get the data from any table. It is all working fine. Now I am trying to make a Entity Class from Database. But after I select the DataSource, there is a Table in the screen which should be populated with the database tables but it is not showing any tables from my database. What should I do to see the tables so that I can select the one for which I want to create an entity? Thanks View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4005252#4005252 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4005252

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: New fileUpload component

by ask4saif

Dear shane, Nice work, how can i download and embed your work in my current seam package. can you send me the link please. thank you in advance View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4005251#4005251 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4005251

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - concurrent conversations changing same data

by codelion

Would like to know what the defined / expected behavior is. Have many real examples, but here is a simplistic one for illustration. I want to know what the default behavior is. What is considered "normal". Sure, workarounds are nice to know, but what is the "intended" way? User U1 enters online grocery store, starts Seam conversation to order items. Picks last loaf of bread (inventory count from 1 down to 0). No extra conversations, please I want to have a problem here. U1 stays in conversation to look and to order other items. Is that bread order now in Seam's memory copy? Is it uncommitted in database? I guess I shouldn't care. I only should care it isn't committed yet, right? Let's assume my database is a MySQL or Oracle that someone has installed with default settings. What would that be more commonly, which isolation level? Does it matter or not? Other user, U2, enters store now. I assume he still sees that last loaf of bread. Right? U1 hasn't ended conversation, hence hasn't committed yet, right? U2 picks that last loaf of bread too. He checks out, coded to end conversation, causes commit. U2 is happy. U1 finally is done and checks out with all items he has ordered. Will there be a conflict of versions at the inventory for bread? I guess I'd need to figure how to Hibernate annotate for version. What exception will be thrown then? Are people expected to recognize the probem from the exception and fix it partially, or is the whole transaction a loss then? I assume the whole transaction is gone bye bye, people don't try to fix parts. Now what if I don't code a version for the record, and there won't be a version conflict. Will simply both U2 and U1 set the inventory for bread to zero? Sure, in a real application I could make separate conversations of each item picked, so the decreased inventory commits, and then if the whole order doesn't get bought then return it. The point of this question is what is supposed to happen in Seam in a simply programmed example. Knowing what can happen can make the risk less scary, more acceptable. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4005249#4005249 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4005249

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: change database

by jbmp user

I read also this document: http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JbpmOnMSSQLServer but it is not actuallity, because it is for jbpm 2 and I am using jbpm 3 I think is very difficult to change database!!!! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4005248#4005248 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4005248

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: h:commandButton requires s:conversationId to work proper

by petemuir

No, it just means that the (wiring) code hasn't been written for JSP. You can acheive the same with <f:param name="conversationId" value="#{conversation.id}" /> I think. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4005247#4005247 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4005247

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: h:commandButton requires s:conversationId to work proper

by mariuszs

anonymous wrote : <s:conversationId> | | Add the conversation id to an output link (or similar JSF control). Facelets only. Why this tag is facelets only? Facelests version of tag h:commandButton need conversationId added? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4005245#4005245 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4005245

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: org.jboss.seam.framework Query too case sensitive

by petemuir

Yes, that's a patch :) You can just attach that as a file to a JIRA issue. Thanks. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4005240#4005240 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4005240

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Validation with pageflows

by petemuir

If validation is failing you shouldn't reach the action method. Post some code! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4005238#4005238 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4005238

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Persistence, JBoss/CMP, Hibernate, Database] - Re: Many-to-one writes non-existing IDs to the DB occasional

by swenbarth

Ok, I have some additional info. In one case, the correct ID that SHOULD have been there is id1 = 119773. The wrong id is id2 = 87005. If I convert those to binary format, I get: | id1 = 11101001111011101 | id2 = 10101001111011101 | As you can see, the second bit (from the left) flipped. I'm beginning to see where the problem may be... something with number conversion between formats? My IDs in the Java classes are of type java.lang.Long, the corresponding fields in the DB (PK and FK columns, autogenerated) are of type BIGINT(20). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4005236#4005236 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4005236

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: IMPORTANT: Changes to entity-query from 1.1.GA to 1.1.1.

by petemuir

"fhh" wrote : PS: I hope this entity-query stuff will work together with the the selectItems component. This would be IMHO the biggest step forward to improve the average working day of the business application developer in years. Not only a step but a leap... It does :) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4005235#4005235 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4005235

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user January 2007