[JBoss Seam] - Re: Seam performance
by rdewell
We're using it on light test-level volume now to run about 40k / month in sales. This includes the management back-end to setup products / manage customers, etc.
Performance is fine, but then we aren't using some of the potentially heavyweight Seam features like conversations. Our primary scope types are EVENT and SESSION. We were early adopters, and conversations just never worked quite right for us, so we didn't look back. They would be nice to use in some cases, but our workflows are simple enough that having the state in hidden fields is sufficient. Still, Seam is the most wonderful way to develop JSF apps in general.
Right now we are deploying two Seam WARs into one EAR. One WAR is the order site, and the other WAR is the management tool. The only annoying thing about this setup is that Seam always WARNs on startup, "There should only be one Seam phase listener per application", and I always worry about future side effects of that warning. Having 2 Seam WARs in the same EAR doesn't really seem that exotic.
Ryan
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4002370#4002370
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4002370
19 years, 3 months
[JBoss Seam] - Problem using MyFaces with Seam
by anana_79
Hi everyone,
I am experiencing errors in deployment when I set my app to use jsfs.
I had to add el-api.jar, el-ri.jar, and jsf-facelets in my server path server\default\deploy\jbossweb-tomcat55.sar\jsf-libs because I was getting an error that there is no Faces Handler.
So, now I am getting this error:
[STDERR] Jan 16, 2007 9:45:09 AM com.sun.facelets.compiler.TagLibraryConfig loadImplicit
INFO: Added Library from: jar:file:/C:/jboss-4.0.4.GA_EJB/server/default/tmp/deploy/tmp13931jboss-seam-registration.ear-contents/jboss-seam-registration-exp.war/WEB-INF/lib/jboss-seam-ui.jar!/META-INF/seam.taglib.xml
09:45:09,631 ERROR [STDERR] Jan 16, 2007 9:45:09 AM com.sun.facelets.compiler.TagLibraryConfig loadImplicit
INFO: Added Library from: jar:file:/C:/jboss-4.0.4.GA_EJB/server/default/tmp/deploy/tmp13882jsf-facelets.jar!/META-INF/jsf-ui.taglib.xml
09:45:09,646 ERROR [STDERR] Jan 16, 2007 9:45:09 AM com.sun.facelets.compiler.TagLibraryConfig loadImplicit
INFO: Added Library from: jar:file:/C:/jboss-4.0.4.GA_EJB/server/default/tmp/deploy/tmp13882jsf-facelets.jar!/META-INF/jsf-html.taglib.xml
09:45:09,646 ERROR [STDERR] Jan 16, 2007 9:45:09 AM com.sun.facelets.compiler.TagLibraryConfig loadImplicit
INFO: Added Library from: jar:file:/C:/jboss-4.0.4.GA_EJB/server/default/tmp/deploy/tmp13882jsf-facelets.jar!/META-INF/jstl-core.taglib.xml
09:45:09,662 ERROR [STDERR] Jan 16, 2007 9:45:09 AM com.sun.facelets.compiler.TagLibraryConfig loadImplicit
INFO: Added Library from: jar:file:/C:/jboss-4.0.4.GA_EJB/server/default/tmp/deploy/tmp13882jsf-facelets.jar!/META-INF/jstl-fn.taglib.xml
09:45:09,662 ERROR [STDERR] Jan 16, 2007 9:45:09 AM com.sun.facelets.compiler.TagLibraryConfig loadImplicit
INFO: Added Library from: jar:file:/C:/jboss-4.0.4.GA_EJB/server/default/tmp/deploy/tmp13882jsf-facelets.jar!/META-INF/jsf-core.taglib.xml
What does it mean?
Am I loading wrong libreries? I am using JBoss Seam 1.0.1 GA.
Please help.
Thanks
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4002368#4002368
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4002368
19 years, 3 months
[JBoss jBPM] - Newbie question about processDefinition.xml
by Nach
Hi!
I've downloaded and installed correctly the Starter's Kit. I ran the sample and it was ok.
Now I want to do certain changes at processDefinition.xml to see what changes on the sample, but I can't find this file into te jbpm-server.
I want to know where is it, because I think then I could put there my own processDefinitions.
I've done various samples with the Designer in Eclipse, and all of them are ok when I work in Eclipse as JUnit Tests, but I want to write my own jsp's to use the process Definitions I made, and for this, I must understand the sample and all the deployment process.
I tried to see the wiki posted in this forum, but the link seems to be broken.
If anyone can help, please answer.
Thanks
PS: Excuse me, my English is not too good.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4002365#4002365
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4002365
19 years, 3 months
[JBossCache] - Buddy replication behavior
by puggelli
Hi all,
I'm testing the buddy replication with JBossCache version 1.4.0-SP1.
I found a strange behavior, so I'm wondering if it is correct.
Let suppose to have there caches A, B, C configured with:
| <attribute name="BuddyReplicationConfig">
| <config>
| <buddyReplicationEnabled>true</buddyReplicationEnabled>
| <buddyLocatorClass>org.jboss.cache.buddyreplication.NextMemberBuddyLocator</buddyLocatorClass>
| <buddyCommunicationTimeout>50000</buddyCommunicationTimeout>
|
| <buddyLocatorProperties>
| numBuddies = 1
| ignoreColocatedBuddies = true
| </buddyLocatorProperties>
|
| <dataGravitationRemoveOnFind>false</dataGravitationRemoveOnFind>
| <dataGravitationSearchBackupTrees>true</dataGravitationSearchBackupTrees>
| <autoDataGravitation>false</autoDataGravitation>
| </config>
| </attribute>
|
If the caches are started in the A, B, C order then the replication chain
is A replicates on B, B replicates on C and C replicates on A:
A -> B -> C -> A
Let suppose to store 1 on A, 2 on B and 3 on C with the call:
| cache.put(new Fqn(new Integer(x)), key, value);
|
where x is 1,2 and 3 and key/value some data.
Then the caches contain (all the three caches are running on the
192.168.0.4 host).
A (192.168.0.4:33510)
| /
| _BUDDY_BACKUP_
| 192.168.0.4_33517
| 3
| 1
|
B (192.168.0.4:33512)
| /
| _BUDDY_BACKUP_
| 192.168.0.4_33510
| 1
| 2
|
C (192.168.0.4:33517)
| /
| _BUDDY_BACKUP_
| 192.168.0.4_33512
| 2
| 3
|
If the process where the cache A is killed then the data contained in
the other two is the following:
B (192.168.0.4:33512)
| /
| _BUDDY_BACKUP_
| 192.168.0.4_33510
| 1
| 192.168.0.4_33517
| 3
| 2
|
C (192.168.0.4:33517)
| /
| _BUDDY_BACKUP_
| 192.168.0.4_33512
| 2
| 3
|
I think that this is not correct, it should be:
B (192.168.0.4:33512)
| /
| _BUDDY_BACKUP_
| 192.168.0.4_33517
| 3
| 2
| 1
|
C (192.168.0.4:33517)
| /
| _BUDDY_BACKUP_
| 192.168.0.4_33512
| 2
| 1
| 3
|
Thanks in advance for your time.
best regards
gianluca
--
Gianluca Puggelli
skype:pugg1138
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4002364#4002364
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4002364
19 years, 3 months