[JBoss Messaging] - Re: 1.2Beta: performance test deploy-destination steps gives
by batter
OK, changed it as below; step 0 (drain) always fails and I had to add a <execution provider="JBossMQ"/>
to the 0Kb throughput test to actual be able to compare the two. I noticed that only this test turned is on by default in perf.xml.
Also noticed that my receive rate is higher than my send rate, impressive :-)
Anyways the output I was able to generate, let me know if that is what you would expect and again, thanks for the help (differences between MQ and messaging seems rather small (~5%) in the particular test):
| [java] 13:51:09,937 INFO [PerformanceTest]
| [java] 13:51:09,937 INFO [PerformanceTest] PerformanceTest[Throughput O KB Message Non-Persistent Non-Transactional, 1 sender, 1 receiver](JBossMessagin
| g, JBossMQ)
| [java] 13:51:09,937 INFO [PerformanceTest]
| [java] 13:51:10,093 INFO [PerformanceTest] executor rmi://localhost:7777/remote on-line
| [java] 13:51:10,109 INFO [PerformanceTest] executor rmi://localhost:7777/local-messaging on-line
| [java] 13:51:10,109 INFO [PerformanceTest] executor rmi://localhost:7777/local-messaging2 on-line
| [java] 13:51:10,109 INFO [PerformanceTest]
| [java] 13:51:10,109 INFO [PerformanceTest] Execution 1 (provider JBossMessaging)
| [java] 13:51:10,187 WARN [PerformanceTest] job DRAIN JOB failed: null
| [java] 13:51:10,187 INFO [PerformanceTest] 0. FAILURE
| [java] 13:51:10,187 INFO [PerformanceTest] 1. PARALLEL
| [java] 13:51:15,250 INFO [PerformanceTest] SEND JOB sent 1000 messages in 5001 ms with a target rate 200 messages/sec, real rate 199.96 messages/sec
|
| [java] 13:51:15,250 INFO [PerformanceTest] RECEIVE JOB received 1000 messages in 4969 ms with a target rate 0 messages/sec, real rate 201.25 message
| s/sec
| [java] 13:51:15,250 INFO [PerformanceTest] 2. PARALLEL
| [java] 13:51:17,797 INFO [PerformanceTest] SEND JOB sent 1000 messages in 2500 ms with a target rate 400 messages/sec, real rate 400.0 messages/sec
| [java] 13:51:17,797 INFO [PerformanceTest] RECEIVE JOB received 1000 messages in 2485 ms with a target rate 0 messages/sec, real rate 402.41 message
| s/sec
| [java] 13:51:17,797 INFO [PerformanceTest]
| [java] 13:51:17,797 INFO [PerformanceTest] executor rmi://localhost:7777/remote on-line
| [java] 13:51:17,812 INFO [PerformanceTest] executor rmi://localhost:7777/local-jbossmq on-line
| [java] 13:51:17,812 INFO [PerformanceTest] executor rmi://localhost:7777/local-jbossmq2 on-line
| [java] 13:51:17,812 INFO [PerformanceTest]
| [java] 13:51:17,812 INFO [PerformanceTest] Execution 2 (provider JBossMQ)
| [java] 13:51:17,859 WARN [PerformanceTest] job DRAIN JOB failed: javax.naming.Reference
| [java] 13:51:17,859 INFO [PerformanceTest] 0. FAILURE
| [java] 13:51:17,859 INFO [PerformanceTest] 1. PARALLEL
| [java] 13:51:23,047 INFO [PerformanceTest] SEND JOB sent 1000 messages in 5016 ms with a target rate 200 messages/sec, real rate 199.36 messages/sec
|
| [java] 13:51:23,047 INFO [PerformanceTest] RECEIVE JOB received 1000 messages in 5016 ms with a target rate 0 messages/sec, real rate 199.36 message
| s/sec
| [java] 13:51:23,047 INFO [PerformanceTest] 2. PARALLEL
| [java] 13:51:25,719 INFO [PerformanceTest] SEND JOB sent 1000 messages in 2609 ms with a target rate 400 messages/sec, real rate 383.29 messages/sec
|
| [java] 13:51:25,719 INFO [PerformanceTest] RECEIVE JOB received 1000 messages in 2640 ms with a target rate 0 messages/sec, real rate 378.79 message
|
Here is my updated destination.xml file:
| <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
| <!--
| The JBoss Messaging performance test destinations.
|
| $Id: messaging-destinations-service.xml 895 2006-04-20 04:07:01Z ovidiu $
| -->
|
| <server>
|
| <loader-repository>jboss.messaging:loader=ScopedLoaderRepository
| <loader-repository-config>java2ParentDelegation=false</loader-repository-config>
| </loader-repository>
|
| <mbean code="org.jboss.jms.server.destination.QueueService"
| name="jboss.messaging.performance:service=Queue,name=simpleQueue"
| xmbean-dd="xmdesc/Queue-xmbean.xml">
| <depends optional-attribute-name="ServerPeer">jboss.messaging:service=ServerPeer</depends>
| <depends>jboss.messaging:service=PostOffice</depends>
| </mbean>
|
|
| <mbean code="org.jboss.jms.server.destination.QueueService"
| name="jboss.messaging.performance:service=Queue,name=largeQueue"
| xmbean-dd="xmdesc/Queue-xmbean.xml">
| <depends optional-attribute-name="ServerPeer">jboss.messaging:service=ServerPeer</depends>
| <depends>jboss.messaging:service=PostOffice</depends>
| <attribute name="FullSize">500000</attribute>
| </mbean>
|
| <mbean code="org.jboss.jms.server.destination.QueueService"
| name="jboss.messaging.performance:service=Queue,name=pagingQueue"
| xmbean-dd="xmdesc/Queue-xmbean.xml">
| <depends optional-attribute-name="ServerPeer">jboss.messaging:service=ServerPeer</depends>
| <depends>jboss.messaging:service=PostOffice</depends>
| <attribute name="FullSize">75000</attribute>
| </mbean>
|
|
| </server>
|
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3998395#3998395
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3998395
19 years, 3 months
[JBossWS] - Support for the
by saegeun
Hello,
I have a fairly critical question for our development team. We are working on a product that uses Microsoft's WS-* library: WSE 3.0 (I'm a long-time Java Dev, but recently have had to work on a .net project. What can you do...). Microsoft's library supports both the "http transport" for sending SOAP messages, and the "tcp transport." For those of you not aware of what the "tcp transport" is, if you set your WS-* library to use the TCP transport, you can create web services outside of a webserver. What happens is the web service will send and receive messages using the TCP protocol, instead of HTTP.
We are now checking the compatibility of using JbossWS with MS WSE 3.0. We will be using a JbossWS client to connect to MS WSE 3.0 server app using WS-Messaging and WS-Addressing. The compatibility of the two seems pretty close, but it doesn't seem like JbossWS supports the tcp transport. I checked around the documentation, the forum and the source itself and couldn't find anything (may have missed it). Does anyone know if it supports the TCP Transport?
Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks in advanced,
Peter
peter.joh.mrmx(a)gmail.com
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3998391#3998391
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3998391
19 years, 3 months