October 2007 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss AOP] - Re: Intercepting web deployment

by flavia.rainone＠jboss.com

Try turning verbose mode on to see if JBoss AOP is trying to weave the target class. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4097221#4097221 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4097221

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss AOP] - Re: verify error when using optimized precompiling

by flavia.rainone＠jboss.com

Hi! Thanks for reporting. All failures are of our interest, specially a VerifyError :) What do you mean with precompiler optimizations? AFAIK JBoss AOP precompiler runs in optimized mode by default, unless you configure a system property "jboss.aop.optimized" with a "false" value. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4097220#4097220 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4097220

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss AOP] - Re: AOP WAR and EAR deployment - JBOSS 4.2.0GA

by flavia.rainone＠jboss.com

Anders is right. Once myaop.jar is referenced somewhere, it is deployed globally on your JBoss AS (so, its effect is not strict to the deployment unit that contains the manifest file). Hence, referencing it twice, even if you're doing this from inside different deployment units, is the same as deploying the same component twice. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4097219#4097219 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4097219

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Installation, Configuration & DEPLOYMENT] - Debugging problems with JRockit JVM

by pkles

Hi!, I´ve been struggling for some time to get the JBoss AS 4.0.5GA to work in debug mode using the JRockit VM. The main problem I am facing is that the breakpoints (setted on EJBs) are sometimes not hitted , and when they are, once the method in which they were setted finishes, the CPU utilization climbs to 100% and the AS hangs. Development environment: + JBoss 4.0.5GA along with EJB3.0, JSF and JPA (Default Hibernate implementation). + JRockit 1.5.0 R27.4.0 + Netbeans 5.5.1. Any clues will be much appreciated. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4097218#4097218 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4097218

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - getting the id of the object inserted...

by minamti

This is more of a Hibernate question. Since many Seam users are Hibernate gurus, I am asking on the Seam Forum. After I persist an object, how do I obtain the id of the object if the id was auto increment in the database. My database is MySQL. Thanks, M View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4097217#4097217 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4097217

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Problem with SEAM + CMT Transaction + JBossCache

by manik.surtani＠jboss.com

HI; are you running in a cluster or a standalone environment? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4097215#4097215 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4097215

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Should you allow @Name on entity beans?

by samdoyle

Hello Dan and thanks for the clarification. I'm still myself fairly new to Seam myself but we are considering using it in two new projects based on successful results in prototyping. Do you know anything about the status of the server side push JavaScript Remoting capability provided by Seam? The last I read was that it was still experimental. The regular remoting works great however we are looking at requirements that suggest using a push would be a better approach. For the time being until Seam has official support for this we are using DWR. Thanks, S.D. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4097213#4097213 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4097213

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - incremental hot deployment clarification

by dan.j.allen

There is some confusion (at least, I perceive there to be) over the purpose of the two source directories in the structure of projects created by seam-gen and how they relate to XML component configuration (via components.xml). The two source directories are: model action The names are slightly misleading. Here is an overview. The model directory is treated as static. This means that once the application gets going, component definitions from the resulting classpath entry (WEB-INF/classes) remain in tact throughout the application's lifetime. (Read as: they are not hot redeployed). The action directory is treated as dynamic. This means that if a change is detected in the classpath entry (a new version of a class appears in WEB-INF/dev), all the component definitions that originated from that directory are removed and it is rescanned for components. (Read as: they are hot redeployed). The hot redeployable directory is an isolated, URL classloader. No classes or other classloaders can see these classes. That means that you cannot put a class in this directory and then define it as a component using XML in components.xml because the classloader that processes those definitions cannot see the classes in the hot redeployable directory. I now arrive at my point, a call for change. I feel that "model" and "action" names are ill-suited for their purpose. Here is my proposal: model -> static action -> dynamic other options include: model -> standard action -> dynamic or hot model -> main action -> redeployable This change would affect projects created by seam-gen. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4097212#4097212 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4097212

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Should you allow @Name on entity beans?

by dan.j.allen

The @Name on entity classes is already handled as a special case. Method interception is disabled. Here is what the @Name gives you for entity classes: 1. give access to entity class via a context variable name for convenience of capturing form data related to the entity without needing to do a factory or other type of initialization 2. allow a default scope to be assigned so that, again, you don't have to do special factory stuff to get a fresh entity instance in conversation scope (which is the default) 3. ability to create a prototype of an entity class using component configuration (configure the properties in components.xml) I don't think there is any harm in doing it. Whether or not you choose to make your entity classes Seam components by giving them a @Name annotation is up to you. If you don't use the @Name annotation, you can always do the same thing via XML in components.xml. There really is no harm in doing so. Remember, entity class components are restricted components in that they have: no bijection no transactions no event handling etc. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4097211#4097211 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4097211

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Should you allow @Name on entity beans?

by samdoyle

By doing this it makes it easier to do things like embed logic into entity beans which is not their intended use. A colleague of mine who is brand new to EJB3 and Seam did that just the other day and I was like wow, that is pretty odd. Unless there are some good use cases for doing this perhaps you guys should disallow this or perhaps throw are verbose warning or something? Just a thought. S.D. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4097210#4097210 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4097210

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user October 2007