[Security & JAAS/JBoss] - Re: mapping principals with digital certificates
by anil.saldhanaï¼ jboss.com
| <!-- The JAAS based authentication and authorization realm implementati
| on
| that is compatible with the jboss 3.2.x realm implementation.
| - certificatePrincipal : the class name of the
| org.jboss.security.auth.certs.CertificatePrincipal impl
| used for mapping X509[] cert chains to a Princpal.
| - allRolesMode : how to handle an auth-constraint with a role-name=*,
| one of strict, authOnly, strictAuthOnly
| + strict = Use the strict servlet spec interpretation which requires
| that the user have one of the web-app/security-role/role-name
| + authOnly = Allow any authenticated user
| + strictAuthOnly = Allow any authenticated user only if there are no
| web-app/security-roles
| -->
| <Realm className="org.jboss.web.tomcat.security.JBossSecurityMgrRealm"
| certificatePrincipal="org.jboss.security.auth.certs.SubjectDNMapping
| "
| allRolesMode="authOnly"
| />
|
server.xml - Realm
I think you need an implementation of CertificatePrincipal
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4093590#4093590
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4093590
18Â years, 8Â months
[JBoss Seam] Seam-Gen: Current best practices for dealing with JBSEAM-994?
by Tony Payne
What is considered the best practice for dealing with JBSEAM-994,
where seam-gen is unable to deal with tables which reference another
table multiple times? I'm evaluating using Seam, and this is
presenting a significant roadblock to my evaluation. I am reluctant
to fix the Home classes directly, as I will be regenerating pretty
frequently during the early phases of the project.
Tony
18Â years, 8Â months