October 2007 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Stupid ajax4jsf filter when downloading files

by pete.muir＠jboss.org

It's a bug in RF. But you can't disable the filter because of a missing in Seam. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4091954#4091954 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4091954

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Message Driven Bean starting jbpm process

by jgeraert

See JBSEAM-2047 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4091953#4091953 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4091953

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Stupid ajax4jsf filter when downloading files

by franck93

anonymous wrote : unfortunately you are caught between a rock and a hard place :( anonymous wrote : I think that you can disable the parser for a particular view to workaround the problem. Who's right? Is there or isn't there a workaround to have both functionnalities running within the same application? I can't believe than despite that this issue's description, it has been considered as a feature request rather than a bug. Isn't the filter supposed to detect that the http response content type is plain "application/pdf" and not "text/html" and so it stears clear of filtering it because it's binary data? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4091952#4091952 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4091952

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[EJB 3.0] - Transaction not rolling back in CONTAINER mode

by umberto_soprano

Hello, I've a EHB3 Stateless bean who's using direct JDBC connections (no persistence manager) to store data in a database. If I try to use TransactionManagement=CONTAINER Jboss seems to not execute roll backs in case of exceptions (both Application or Runtime exception). I inserted an as hoc thrown Exception to simulate the fault. Managing TransactionManagement=BEAN works. Any suggestion (code example below)? CONTAINER mode (no rollback): | | @Stateless | @javax.ejb.ApplicationException(rollback = true) | @TransactionManagement(TransactionManagementType.CONTAINER) | public class x implements y,z{ | | @TransactionAttribute(TransactionAttributeType.REQUIRES_NEW) | public Message processMessage() throws Exception | { | | try { | <<insert to DB>> | << launch Exception>> | } catch (Exception e1) | { | <<log>> | throw e1; | }} | | BEAN mode (rollback executed): | | @Stateless | @javax.ejb.ApplicationException(rollback = true) | @TransactionManagement(TransactionManagementType.CONTAINER) | public class x implements y,z{ | | @Resource | private UserTransaction utx; | | @TransactionAttribute(TransactionAttributeType.REQUIRES_NEW) | public Message processMessage() throws Exception | { | | try { | utx.begin(); | <<insert to DB>> | << launch Exception>> | utx.commit(); | } catch (Exception e1) | { | utx.rollback(); | <<log>> | throw e1; | }} | | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4091951#4091951 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4091951

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: How to abandon a conversation?

by stephen.friedrich

Thanks, Pete! Turned out it _is_ working with tr:commandNavigationItem, I only tested with the wrong menu level :-( Anyway, I think the documentation should be improved: * "similar" => "any other JSF component that embeds a child f:param into its submission". * "Facelets only." => "Facelets only - JSP users can instead directly use "<f:param name="conversationPropagation" value="none">" I have not tested the last suggestion, but it should work, right? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4091950#4091950 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4091950

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossCache] - Re: Cache not accessible from different methods ?

by BruceSpringfield

Out of curiosity, which version of POJO Cache are you using? "jacobeukes" wrote : | Would it be possible to post the configuration file (in which you specify the MBean configuration) ? Here is a minimal config you could use to deploy POJO Cache as an MBean. It is for POJO Cache version 1.4.1 which is the default POJO Cache that comes with JBoss 4.2.1 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> | <server> | <mbean code="org.jboss.cache.aop.PojoCache" | name="jboss.cache:service=PojoCache"> | <depends>jboss:service=Naming</depends> | <depends>jboss:service=TransactionManager</depends> | <attribute name="TransactionManagerLookupClass">org.jboss.cache.JBossTransactionManagerLookup</attribute> | <attribute name="NodeLockingScheme">OPTIMISTIC</attribute> | <attribute name="CacheMode">LOCAL</attribute> | <attribute name="LockAcquisitionTimeout">1000</attribute> | <attribute name="BuddyReplicationConfig"> | <config> | <buddyReplicationEnabled>false</buddyReplicationEnabled> | </config> | </attribute> | </mbean> | </server> "jacobeukes" wrote : | I have tried to configure and deploy it as an MBean and also tried running it as a standalone application (as part of a test), but I am just not having any luck. | The MBean deployment can be quite dependent on getting the right config attributes. If the attibutes or settings aren't quite right, you can get a lot of errors or unexpected behaviour. "manik.surtani(a)jboss.com" wrote : | Bruce's case probably worked since when you retrieve the cache from an MBean server rather than create a new one each tme, both cases use the same cache. | Manik is absolutely correct. With an MBean deployment, every access to the cache is accessing the same MBean. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4091949#4091949 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4091949

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Portal] - Re: Jboss Portal 2.6 problems with API login and an URL requ

by Antoine_h

strange what you are doing not sure to have clearly understood how you "call" the portlet, but quite sure it is a wrong idea... you may isolate the feature outside the portlet : put it in some independant class, or better, in a JMX service. the portlet call this feature when it need it the login event also. this feature should not need all the portlet stuff... so could be isolated in a JMX service. hope it helps, View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4091947#4091947 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4091947

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: seam in a portal

by suckerd

Hi cwash, there are still some issues concering seam+ portal http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=SeamPortlet. On the other hand some stuff might work with seam 1.2.1 http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=89767&postdays=0... ...but for seam2.0 (with ajax4jsf and richfaces) all portlet examples are gone :( http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=119038&postdays=... and here is the jira issue - please vote for it http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-1585 ...hope this helps - I would much appreciate the portlet+ajax+richfaces+seam solution!! CU Mike View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4091944#4091944 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4091944

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Integration of Jboss Portal with Seam and Facelets

by suckerd

Hi Danny, there are still some issues concering seam+ portal http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=SeamPortlet. On the other hand some stuff might work with seam 1.2.1 http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=89767&postdays=0... ...but for seam2.0 (with ajax4jsf and richfaces) all portlet examples are gone :( http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=119038&postdays=... and here is the jira issue - please vote for it http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-1585 ...hope this helps... CU Mike View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4091943#4091943 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4091943

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - swimlane

by fuligj

In the sample webapp, that comes with jpdl-3.2.2, the task "Evaluate web order" assigned to "manager", but all of the users can see it an execute too. Is that correct? I would like it, if only secreted would see his task. The swimlanes not in this direction good? Best regards! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4091942#4091942 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4091942

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user October 2007