November 2007 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Eclipse dynamic web project, seam, glassfish, hibernate

by pete.muir＠jboss.org

The glassfish example is now the jee5 example - no eclipse project with it, so build the example for glassfish, and then deconstruct the build ear/war. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4105380#4105380 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4105380

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: s:link propagation

by pete.muir＠jboss.org

File a feature request, not an unreasonable request :) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4105379#4105379 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4105379

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[EJB 3.0] - Re: Getter for LAZY property gets called on every commit

by itsme

Don't store the byte[]'s in the persistent entity itself instead of a list of ID's or a smaller preview object. So you cann get the real byte[] (document) you want with an extra call to an ejb that only stores and delivers documents. Hope this helps. \sandor\ View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4105378#4105378 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4105378

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: RuleBasedIdentity vs CustomLdapIdentity - is it a bug

by pete.muir＠jboss.org

Set the precedence higher than framework e.g. to DEPLOYMENT (the default) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4105376#4105376 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4105376

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: BookingListAction SFSB and Serializable interface

by pete.muir＠jboss.org

1) Because it does,I don't think it required (probably left over from when it did) 2) Not sure, ask on an EJB3 forum 3) Log is Externalizable. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4105375#4105375 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4105375

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Tools (users)] - Update site avaiable for 2.0.0.CR1

by mculpepper＠jboss.com

Just a quick update. The 2.0.0.CR1 update site has been uploaded including our new XULRunner integration from Mozilla. You can find it at the normal place: http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/development View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4105373#4105373 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4105373

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Seam, security and session

by pete.muir＠jboss.org

Use a page action on /home.xhtml to check login and issue a redirect using FacesManager if they are. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4105372#4105372 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4105372

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - RuleBasedIdentity vs CustomLdapIdentity - is it a bug

by PatrickMadden

Hi, Rule based identity is defined as follows: | @Name("org.jboss.seam.security.identity") | @Scope(SESSION) | @BypassInterceptors | @Install(precedence=FRAMEWORK, classDependencies="org.drools.WorkingMemory") | @Startup | public class RuleBasedIdentity extends Identity{... | I want to define a new class as follows: | @Name("org.jboss.seam.security.identity") | @Scope(SESSION) | @BypassInterceptors | | // if com.foo.security.ldap.ActiveDirectorySupport is in the path | // then we are using active directory. It should be a mini jar file put in | // the path via the installer. | | @Install(precedence=FRAMEWORK, | classDependencies="com.foo.security.ldap.ActiveDirectorySupport") | @Startup | public class ActiveDirectoryIdentity extends Identity{ | However, when I do so I get errors like this: | jvm 1 | SEVERE: Exception sending context initialized event to listener instance of class org.jboss.seam.servlet.SeamListener | jvm 1 | java.lang.IllegalStateException: Two components with the same name and precedence: org.jboss.seam.security.identity | jvm 1 | at org.jboss.seam.init.Initialization.addComponentDescriptor(Initialization.java:456) | jvm 1 | at org.jboss.seam.init.Initialization.installScannedComponentAndRoles(Initialization.java:739) | jvm 1 | at org.jboss.seam.init.Initialization.scanForComponents(Initialization.java:683) | jvm 1 | at org.jboss.seam.init.Initialization.init(Initialization.java:536) | jvm 1 | at org.jboss.seam.servlet.SeamListener.contextInitialized(SeamListener.java:34) | jvm 1 | at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.listenerStart(StandardContext.java:3830) | jvm 1 | at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.start(StandardContext.java:4337) | jvm 1 | at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.start(ContainerBase.java:1045) | jvm 1 | at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost.start(StandardHost.java:719) | jvm 1 | at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.start(ContainerBase.java:1045) | jvm 1 | at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngine.start(StandardEngine.java:443) | jvm 1 | at org.apache.catalina.startup.Embedded.start(Embedded.java:825) | jvm 1 | at com.foo.bar.tomcat.EmbeddedTomcat.startTomcat(EmbeddedTomcat.java:238) | Is this a bug or as designed? The reason I want to do this is because when I step in the debugger watching Microsoft Active Directory JAAS the roles are not that simple. I wanted to be able to catch and inspect them and possibly massage them. Either way, shouldn't the classDependencies be part of the unique key? Thanks in advance. PVM View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4105371#4105371 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4105371

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: deep long-lasting serialization error, please help

by pete.muir＠jboss.org

No idea, perhaps try posting in the JBoss Serialization forum, as it looks to me like you are using JBoss Serialization. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4105370#4105370 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4105370

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: large application

by svadu

Hard to say as companies that do use seam hesitate to publish any info. And there aren't that many public site that are built with seam (except http://in.relation.to/Bloggers may be). When I switched from plain jsf/facelets to seam/facelets my performance increased due to usage of conversations (I didn't want to use session and had to use request scope more often than I wanted). What you have to be concerned is memory leaks as those are harder to detect and it's actually dependent on your project just as much as on the production-readyness of seam version you're using. >From what I understand the Seam development team would gladly look at any memory leaking issues for as long as you provide them with the data :) Besides if you want to start project that I would consider getting commercial support... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4105369#4105369 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4105369

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user November 2007