November 2007 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Different AJAX behaviour in Firefox and IE

by DamonChong

Ah, I see.....guess I must look for a better approach then. Thank you! :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4104810#4104810 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4104810

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossWS] - Re: Enabling cookies in a JBossWS web service client

by cbalaves

Thanks, Richard! It worked! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4104803#4104803 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4104803

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: s:decorate - default template

by Kragoth

Thanks pete. I'm not sure what you mean by a factory in components.xml but I'll try and see if I can find some doco about that. I really appreciate all the help you guys give. I have submitted the feature request. I'm not sure of the details I should give it but it's there. http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBSEAM-2249 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4104802#4104802 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4104802

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Portal] - Injecting user/role using http headers

by ganeshmb

Is it possible to inject the user and role information from an external authentication engine through HTTP headers? I want to somehow configure the portal to blindly use the user/role that are being passed as HTTP headers in the first request. >From what I have been reading so far, I believe it's possible to write a custom login module and override validatePassword method to not verify the password in portal's data source. But I am not sure how I can make the portal blindly use the user/role strings in the HTTP header of the incoming request? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4104801#4104801 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4104801

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - seam-gen entities: cascading bug or accepted behavior?

by sstrenn

Folks, When seam-gen generates an entity with a one-to-many association to another entity, it appears to always set the cascade attribute to CascadeType.ALL. My sense is that this is incorrect behavior when the foreign key's constraint in the database is set to ON DELETE RESTRICT. Is this an "undocumented feature", or an misunderstanding of the expected behavior on my part. If so, could you please give me a quick explanation of why CascadeType.ALL is correct when a foreign key's constraint is ON DELETE RESTRICT. Thanks, Stephen View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4104799#4104799 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4104799

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Clustering/JBoss] - Farm hot-deploy waits for MDBs to finish?

by seoeng

I have MDBs which sometimes run lengthy processes. I want to be able to drop a new EAR into the /farm directory, and all of the apps should restart/redeploy. But what is happening is that the apps which are running these long-running MDBs are waiting for the MDBs to finish before restarting/redeploying. What is the recommended solution? I don't care about the MDBs not finishing -- they will just restart once the app is redeployed, correct? The MDBs are bean-managed. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4104798#4104798 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4104798

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Persistence, JBoss/CMP, Hibernate, Database] - Re: STILL HAVING ISSUES...Neither EJB 2.1 or 3.0 are deploye

by darretta

Should mention that the errors are: -- No entity manager injection -- EJBs not bound exception View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4104797#4104797 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4104797

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Persistence, JBoss/CMP, Hibernate, Database] - STILL HAVING ISSUES...Neither EJB 2.1 or 3.0 are deployed

by darretta

I have sent a number of conflicting messages due to various circumstances, but my bottom line now is that neither my 2.1 nor 3.0 beans deploy. My environment is JBoss 4.0.3SPI (with RC5 update), Redhat Linux 3.5 ES, Java 1.5.0_12, J2EE 5 persistence apis.... Here is what I've done thus far: (1) Cleaned all jars/ears/wars of outside jar imports - I now rely 100% on JBoss supplied libraries (2) Packaged my product as so: myapp.ear | | | -- META-INF/application.xml | | | -- myapp-ejb.jar | | | -- META-INF/persistence.xml | | | -- META-INF/ejb-jar.xml | | | -- META-INF/jbosscmp-jdbc.xml | | | -- META-INF/jboss.xml | | | -- myapp-war.war | | | -- WEB-INF/web.xml | (Note that EJB 2.1 and 3.0 beans are in the same ejb.jar file). Below is my persistence.xml: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> | <persistence version="1.0" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/persistence_1_0.xsd"> | <persistence-unit name="vramPu" transaction-type="JTA"> | <provider>org.hibernate.ejb.HibernatePersistence</provider> | <jta-data-source>java:/nicweb/DataSource</jta-data-source> | <properties> | <property name="hibernate.hbm2ddl.auto" value="update"/> | </properties> | </persistence-unit> | </persistence> Here is the declaration for my web.xml: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> | <web-app version="2.5" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee" xmlns:xsi="http | ://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/x | ml/ns/javaee http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/web-app_2_5.xsd"> | <display-name>vram-dos</display-name> Here is my application.xml: | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> | <application version="5" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/application_5.xsd"> | | <display-name>vram-dos-server</display-name> | |  | <module> | <ejb>nicweb-jboss-ds.xml</ejb> | </module> | | <module> | <ejb>mail-service.xml</ejb> | </module> | | <module> | <ejb>vram-dos-server-ejb.jar</ejb> | </module> | | <module> | <web> | <web-uri>vram-dos-server-war.war</web-uri> | <context-root>/vram-dos-server-webapp</context-root> | </web> | </module> | | </application> Any help is appreciated. Thanks, Mike View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4104796#4104796 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4104796

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[EJB 3.0] - Re: @id id data type: primitive or object which one is bette

by mazz＠jboss.com

i use primitives, seems to make the most sense (since its a primary key, its can't be nullable, so using larger Object representation doesn't seem necessary). Some people don't like setting the primitive int to "0" to indicate the ID isn't set - if you are one of those people, use Integer so you can set it to null to indicate the primary key isn't set yet. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4104795#4104795 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4104795

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[EJB 3.0] - Re: @id id data type: primitive or object which one is bette

by gus888

No help? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4104794#4104794 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4104794

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user November 2007