December 2007 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss Seam] - selected tab is lost on sorting of embeded datatable

by marius.oancea

I have a page with many <rich:tab> components. Each component has it's own dataTable (sortable and paginable). If I select second tab and try to press on sort link, the system reselects the first tab (because page is reloaded). One way to prevent this is to do something like this: 1. add selectedTab attribute <rich:tabPanel selectedTab="#{tab}" switchType="ajax" > 2. add in pages.xml (for this view) 3. modify all (sort + next / prev) links to send tab parameter. 4. If you have forms add a hidden field for "tab" to not get lost Note: page is backed with entityHome and entityQuery like in seam-gen generated files. Is there any better (simpler) solution to do that? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4111091#4111091 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4111091

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: seam and hibernate search give Session is closed! Except

by thiagu.m

any help please i am still waithing By Thiagu View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4111088#4111088 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4111088

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: NamedQuery not known in Component

by sahoo

There is a tool called verifier in GlassFish bin directory. Can you use it to verify your ear file? You can run it as shown below: $GlassFishHOME/bin/verifier path/to/your/ear It produces a .txt file which can help you in debugging persistence unit visbility. Thanks, Sahoo View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4111087#4111087 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4111087

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Remoting] - Re: Transporter communication across firewalls, any suggesti

by ron.sigal＠jboss.com

Couple of points. anonymous wrote : | However since then I discovered that the Servers will not know the address of the Client's firewall. | As of Remoting version 2.2.2.GA, there is an undocumented facility for getting the address of the client as it appears to the server. If you do something like this: | Object o = client.invoke("$GET_CLIENT_LOCAL_ADDRESS$"); | InvocationResponse response = (InvocationResponse) o; | InetAddress newAddress = (InetAddress) response.getResult(); | on the client side, newAddress will hold the address returned by calling Socket.getInetAddress() on the server side socket that received the invocation. That address could then be communicated to the server side. Maybe that could help? anonymous wrote : | I started off using the SSLSocket Transporter | Note that Transporters are a convenient wrapping of the Remoting callback facility, but they're not as flexible. If there's something you can't do with Transporters, you might want to look at callbacks. One possibility might be the use of callbacks over the bisocket transport. The bisocket transport doesn't create a ServerSocket on the client side and doesn't need a client address to send callbacks. Instead, all connections are created from the client to the server. See Section 5.4.16. "Bisocket invoker" of the Remoting Guide (http://labs.jboss.com/jbossremoting/docs/guide/index.html). anonymous wrote : | Does Remoting allow for bidirectional sockets at the transporter level? I saw some implementation of bidirectional sockets and ssl sockets at the lower invoker level. If not, is this currently planned? | The next generation of Remoting is currently being developed, and it should have a purer form of bidirectional connection. There's a lot of discussion about Remoting 3 on the "Design of JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers" forum: http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewforum&f=176). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4111086#4111086 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4111086

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossWS] - Re: UsernameToken authentication using JBossWS

by leandroal

"leandroal" wrote : Do you say something like this: | | Map<String, Object> requestContext = ((BindingProvider)serviceSoap).getRequestContext(); | requestContext.put(BindingProvider.USERNAME_PROPERTY, "xxx"); | requestContext.put(BindingProvider.PASSWORD_PROPERTY, "yyy"); | | If yes, I did and it doesn't work. | | When I run wsconsumer against the wsdl, it generated the UsernameToken java class and I can instantiate it: | | UsernameToken usernameToken = new UsernameToken(); | usernameToken.setUsername("xxx"); | usernameToken.setPassword("yyyy"); | | But how to add this object into the SOAP Header? | | Thanks, | Leandro. | | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4111084#4111084 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4111084

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossWS] - Re: UsernameToken authentication using JBossWS

by leandroal

Do you say something like this: Map<String, Object> requestContext = ((BindingProvider)serviceSoap).getRequestContext(); requestContext.put(BindingProvider.USERNAME_PROPERTY, "OULU"); requestContext.put(BindingProvider.PASSWORD_PROPERTY, "810420_A"); If yes, I did and it doesn't work. When I run wsconsumer against the wsdl, it generated the UsernameToken java class and I can instantiate it: UsernameToken usernameToken = new UsernameToken(); usernameToken.setUsername("xxx"); usernameToken.setPassword("yyyy"); But how to add this object into the SOAP Header? Thanks, Leandro. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4111083#4111083 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4111083

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Portal] - Re: removing the default portal

by lvcster

Hi PeterJ and Everyone, I followed all what u said above, removing the wars/sara i dont need. I ddi just that, and now the protal is clean, except for the 3 tabs(Home, News, and Weather), and the login link on the top right hand side corner. Tell me how do i get rid of this? And i want to change the JBossPortal Logo, background and the rest how do i go about doing that? Please help. Thanks. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4111080#4111080 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4111080

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Pageflow & 3rd Party Site

by chane

"pete.muir(a)jboss.org" wrote : I'm surprised, I think the pageflow scope state should have been maintained. But its hard to know why its not without seeing the application. I also thought the pageflow scope should have been in the conversation. I couldn't figure out what was causing it to not be there. I am using Seam 1.2.0 patch 1 - so maybe something there... Since I found a workaround quickly I haven't looked deeper into the Seam code to figure out why the pageflow scope is not there. Maybe I'll get a chance when I upgrade to Seam 2.x - I have a comment in the code to look at it again. Thanks for the suggestion on passing the conversation id around. Chris.... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4111078#4111078 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4111078

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Remoting] - Re: SSL Socket in .Sar file

by ron.sigal＠jboss.com

I'm not sure what you're trying to do. Note that a SAR file describes a service configured to run in the Application Server. Normally, on the server side you would be interested in creating an SSLServerSocket rather than an SSLSocket. I can tell you, however, that Remoting supports SSL connections using the Remoting https, sslrmi, sslsocket and sslbisocket transports. Remoting clients using these transports create SSLSockets. For more information about Remoting, see the Remoting Guide at http://labs.jboss.com/jbossremoting/docs/guide/index.html. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4111077#4111077 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4111077

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Remoting] - Re: transporterclient not thread-safe for failover

by ron.sigal＠jboss.com

Ok, I see JBREM-857 "transporterclient not thread-safe for failover". Thanks, Craig. Depending on timing, the fix may or may not make into the next release. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4111076#4111076 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4111076

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user December 2007