December 2007 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss Seam] - Re: problem with Integration test in Seam 2.0.0 GA

by pete.muir＠jboss.org

SeamTest tells Embedded JBoss to deploy resources which have seam.properties or WEB-INF/components.xml or META-INF/components.xml in only - hence without the file, the directory isn't scanned. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4114779#4114779 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4114779

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: @Factory method kills my @In fields

by pete.muir＠jboss.org

You don't want the @DataModel and the @Factory outjecting to the same context variable either. Post the exception and stack trace you are getting. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4114778#4114778 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4114778

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Update transactions occurring prematurely in Seam app

by asookazian

Hey it works now! Not sure if JBoss wasn't picking up the deployment or what (I had to remove an @Out annotation as well that wasn't being used). The premature update is gone with flushMode=MANUAL and SMPC. thanks! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4114776#4114776 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4114776

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: formatting items in <s:selectItems>

by valeriopp

That's what I needed. Thanks, Valerio View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4114775#4114775 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4114775

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Tools (users)] - Re: Importing existing Seam projects to JBoss Tools

by max.andersen＠jboss.com

What kind of existing project are you referring to ? A seam-gen style project ? Then there is not much to it besides enabling Seam on it under Project properties. Unfortuanetly since seam-gen projects is not really geared towards eclipse dev so somethings won't work as easy as with seam wizard generated projects. You can see the release announcement for how to setup archiving and just remember that Seam artifact wizards will only work with Seam wizard projects, but code completion etc. will work by just enabling seam. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4114773#4114773 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4114773

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Messaging] - Re: Is there a way to stop message from being resent?

by timfox

http://labs.jboss.com/file-access/default/members/jbossmessaging/freezone... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4114771#4114771 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4114771

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Portal] - Changing the isolation level for Portal's TreeCache

by ekusnitz＠enernoc.com

Environment: JBoss AS 4.0.5GA Configuration: All Portal version: 2.4.1 Using jboss-portal-ha.sar in a cluster We are noticing that there are quite a bit of locking problems with the JBoss Portal TreeCache. Here is one example: read lock for /org/hibernate/cache/StandardQueryCache/sql: select userinstan0_.PK as PK16_, userinstan0_.INSTANCE_PK as INSTANCE2_16_, userinstan0_.SER_STATE as SER3_16_, userinstan0_.USER_ID as USER4_16_, userinstan0_.PORTLET_REF as PORTLET5_16_ from JBP_INSTANCE_PER_USER userinstan0_ where userinstan0_.INSTANCE_PK=? and userinstan0_.USER_ID=?; parameters: ; named parameters: {userId=jplaprise(a)ascentmedia.com, instanceKey=25} could not be acquired by GlobalTransaction:<ensumapp01-01:32792>:903 after 10000 ms. Locks: Read lock owners: [] | | Write lock owner: GlobalTransaction:<ensumapp01-01:32792>:902 | | , lock info: write owner=GlobalTransaction:<ensumapp01-01:32792>:902 (activeReaders=0, activeWriter=Thread[TP-Processor1,5,jboss], waitingReaders=0, waitingWriters=0, waitingUpgrader=0) We are hardly using Portal features at all and in fact plan to remove it in the next version of our application. We are not using Portal state replication or ClusteredSingleSignOn. My question is, we have noticed that by default Portal uses REPEATABLE_READ for the isolation level for its TreeCache. What are the implications of downgrading it to READ_COMMITTED or even lower? Would this possibly eliminate the problem? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4114769#4114769 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4114769

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: @Factory method kills my @In fields

by tomstrummer

I should also mention this is on Seam 2.0.0CR1 and JBoss AS 4.2.1 GA. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4114767#4114767 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4114767

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: problem with Integration test in Seam 2.0.0 GA

by seamdev

Oops.. I was under the impression that having seam.properties on classpath was sufficient. The file was on classpath and was placed in WEB-INF/classes when war was built and it works fine. Copying seam.properties over to build/classes has resolved all integration test problems... Thanks for help! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4114766#4114766 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4114766

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: @Factory method kills my @In fields

by tomstrummer

"pete.muir(a)jboss.org" wrote : Seam injects by variable name, not by type so try @In TestEntity testEntity; Hmm nope, sorry that did not help. Same error. Here is the updated code snice I realized I had a typo in my template as well: TestImpl.java | import java.util.ArrayList; | import java.util.List; | | import javax.ejb.Stateless; | | import org.jboss.seam.ScopeType; | import org.jboss.seam.annotations.Factory; | import org.jboss.seam.annotations.In; | import org.jboss.seam.annotations.Logger; | import org.jboss.seam.annotations.Name; | import org.jboss.seam.annotations.datamodel.DataModel; | import org.jboss.seam.log.Log; | | @Stateless | @Name("test") | public class TestImpl implements Test { | @Logger Log log; | | public void biteMe() { | log.info( testEntity.getName() ); | something.add(testEntity); | } | | @In(scope=ScopeType.EVENT) private TestEntity testEntity; | | @DataModel(scope=ScopeType.PAGE) List<TestEntity> something; | | @Factory("something") | public List<TestEntity> initSomething() { | List<TestEntity> list = new ArrayList<TestEntity>(); | return list; | } | } | test.xhtml: | <!DOCTYPE composition PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" | "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> | <ui:composition xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" | xmlns:s="http://jboss.com/products/seam/taglib" | xmlns:ui="http://java.sun.com/jsf/facelets" | xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core" | xmlns:h="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html" | xmlns:rich="http://richfaces.org/rich" | template="layout/template.xhtml"> | | <ui:define name="body"> | | <h:messages globalOnly="true" styleClass="message"/> | | <rich:panel> | <f:facet name="header">Test!</f:facet> | | <h:form> | <h:inputText value='#{testEntity.name}' /> | <h:commandButton type="submit" value='Create' action='#{test.biteMe}' /> | | <h:dataTable value='#{something}' var='profile'> | <h:column> | <f:facet name='header'><h:outputText value='Name' /></f:facet> | <h:outputText value='#{profile.profileName}' /> | </h:column> | </h:dataTable> | </h:form> | | </rich:panel> | | </ui:define> | </ui:composition> | For real... Comment out that "@Factory" annotation and suddenly it works (of course the list is not initialized then...) Any other ideas? Thanks again. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4114765#4114765 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4114765

18 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user December 2007