March 2007 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss Seam] - Re: JAAS login with JBoss Seam

by fady.matar

This approach worked for me before, but I was wondering if the identity component can be wired. Using the regular authentication / authorization module makes the seam identity component useless. I believe that one approach to benefit from the identity module is to write the LDAP authentication within the authenticate method and provide an XML configuration to make it more or less portable. I would like to get Gavin's feedback on that View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4032399#4032399 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4032399

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossCache] - Re: Clustered/Multiprocess shared filecacheloader reliabilit

by manik.surtani＠jboss.com

I presume the file would be on a shared disk which would be mounted on each of the servers in the cluster? Most network file systems don't have proper locking support. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4032398#4032398 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4032398

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: cannot destroy component exception

by waynebagguley

"gavin.king(a)jboss.com" wrote : You need to set your SFSB timeout longer than your HTTP session timeout. This is in the FAQ, and we have already added it to the reference documentation. | | I'm not sure how a simply config setting that is described in the FAQ, and has been discussed in several forum threads could lead you to lose confidence in a project, but that's just me, I suppose. It just seems totally lame that you have to make such a configuration change to avoid the exception and it reduces application flexibility if the session timeout needs to be changed in future as each and every session bean would need to be changed. A better solution needs to be found. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4032396#4032396 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4032396

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: COMPOUNDs, ATOMs & MOLECULEs - don't try this at home!

by petemuir

This would be my approach: 1) Use seam-gen to generate an app (not using reveng of tables) 2) Translate your schema into JPA/EJB3 entity beans with appropriate annotations 3) Create the relevant framework components (i.e. a entityquery for atoms and compounds, entityhome for molecule 4) Create a simple CRUD screen using a mixture of h:inputText, h:commandButton s:selectItems and s:convertEntity View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4032395#4032395 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4032395

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Exception in PhaseListener RENDER_RESPONSE(6) afterPhase

by c_eric_ray

I'm really having a hell of a time figuring this out. Any advice on how to attack this exception would be appreciated. Using JBoss 4.0.5 and Seam 1.0.1.GA I do not get this exception with JBoss 4.0.4 and Seam 1.0.1.GA. Of note, the problem only occurs when using <s:link>, using <h:commandLink> does not cause this problem. 10:27:47,574 ERROR [PhaseListenerManager] Exception in PhaseListener RENDER_RESPONSE(6) afterPhase | java.lang.IllegalStateException: No active application scope | at org.jboss.seam.core.Init.instance(Init.java:48) | at org.jboss.seam.jsf.SeamPhaseListener.afterPhase(SeamPhaseListener.java:87) | at org.apache.myfaces.lifecycle.PhaseListenerManager.informPhaseListenersAfter(PhaseListenerManager.java:89) | at org.apache.myfaces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.render(LifecycleImpl.java:391) | at javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet.service(FacesServlet.java:138) | at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:252) | at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:173) | at org.jboss.web.tomcat.filters.ReplyHeaderFilter.doFilter(ReplyHeaderFilter.java:96) | at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:202) | at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:173) | at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:213) | at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:178) | at org.jboss.web.tomcat.security.SecurityAssociationValve.invoke(SecurityAssociationValve.java:175) | at org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:524) | at org.jboss.web.tomcat.security.JaccContextValve.invoke(JaccContextValve.java:74) | at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:126) | at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:105) | at org.jboss.web.tomcat.tc5.jca.CachedConnectionValve.invoke(CachedConnectionValve.java:156) | at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:107) | at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:148) | at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:869) | at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11BaseProtocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.processConnection(Http11BaseProtocol.java:664) | at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.PoolTcpEndpoint.processSocket(PoolTcpEndpoint.java:527) | at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.MasterSlaveWorkerThread.run(MasterSlaveWorkerThread.java:112) | at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4032394#4032394 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4032394

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Seam + jBPM + JNDI

by gavin.king＠jboss.com

I don't follow you. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4032390#4032390 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4032390

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Possible Error in Chapter 10. The Seam Application Framework

by mario D

Chapter 10.1 states the following: installs a component which can perform basic CRUD operations for a Contact entity Shouldn't it be : installs a component which can perform basic CRUD operations for a Person entity View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4032383#4032383 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4032383

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Microcontainer] - Acessing Microcontainer Beans in Servlet

by obelix1998

I have defined a few beans in jboss-beans.xml and I want to use them from a servlet. How can I get an instance of a class defined in jboss-beans.xml in my java code ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4032381#4032381 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4032381

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Hibernate Tools in EJB3.0

by max.andersen＠jboss.com

in b9a your persistence.xml needs to be configured for j2se , e.g. not datasource. with the nightly builds you can use a properties file to override the necessary settings. this is what the hibernate tools seam-gen support does automatically for you. look there for info on how to do it. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4032379#4032379 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4032379

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - lazy property loading ?

by zdaler

Is there a way to lazily load entity properties in seam ? I'd like to load a large collection of objects without loading a (potentially large) content inside every one of them ... I've tried : @Lob | @Basic(fetch = FetchType.LAZY) | public String getContent() { | return content; | } But that does not seem to have any effect ... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4032378#4032378 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4032378

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user March 2007