April 2007 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Pros/Cons of war vs. ear deployments (Jboss 4.2)

by christian.bauer＠jboss.com

I think all of this won't happen before JBoss5. I checked out CVS of the Embedded JBoss5 last week and it's working nicely with hot-redeploy of virtual archives. Means I don't even have a WAR anymore, just a bunch of classes with annotations and a few config files, all in one directory. And then I programmatically feed that into a virtual EAR/JAR, which I deploy on JBoss5. IMO this is the approach we should take. WAR and EAR are _deployment_ solutions, I'm not deploying anything when I'm developing software. I just want to see my stuff running in one way or another and I have no idea why everyone (including the IDE vendors) thinks that WARs and EARs are a good idea for that. They are not, in fact, they are so badly designed that everyone writes 5 pages of build.xml just to get the dozens of files into the right locations. Why can't I develop how I like and only use the EAR/WAR stuff when I want to actually _deploy_ my application and run it? So this whole issue should be solved in the second half of this year... I can see other projects (Tapestry for example) also pushing in new directions and only good can come from it. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4037828#4037828 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4037828

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Installation, Configuration & Deployment] - Re: Making the application as default

by jigu888

Niranjan, This seems to be the problem with jboss-5.0.0.Beta1 because when i tried using jboss-4.0.5.GA it is working fine. Below is jboss-web.xml file: --------- <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE jboss-web PUBLIC "-//JBoss//DTD Web Application 2.4//EN" "http://www.jboss.org/j2ee/dtd/jboss-web_4_0.dtd"> <jboss-web> <context-root>/</context-root> </jboss-web> --------- When I hit the URL "http://localhost:8080" I could see my application index page. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4037827#4037827 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4037827

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Portal] - Re: JBoss Portal 2.4.2 CR1 Release

by Antoine_h

Thanks for this ! The choice between 2.4.2 CR1 and 2.6Beta 1 is difficult. The roadmap, on the wiki, does not say any date. Could we have some date for 2.6 Beta 2 and 2.6 Release ? and for 2.4.2 Release ? To know how to organise the upgrades in my dev and prod portal. Thanks again, View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4037826#4037826 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4037826

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Clustering/JBoss] - Re: Tomcat Cluster Error

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

Don't use "deploy/tc5-cluster-service.xml" in 4.0.4 or later. Beginning with 4.0.4 it was replaced with tc5-cluster.sar. The deployment descriptor for the sar is tc5-cluster.sar/META-INF/jboss-service.xml. Make any edits you need to that file. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4037825#4037825 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4037825

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Pros/Cons of war vs. ear deployments (Jboss 4.2)

by stu2

Ahh, so that hasn't changed. I wondered if the embeddable microcontainer stuff might make that a viable option. Has anyone explored using the dynamic classloader for ear deployments? The docs say it's war-only. I understand any EJBs wouldn't be reloadable, but it would be fantastic to get this for everything else. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4037824#4037824 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4037824

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Pros/Cons of war vs. ear deployments (Jboss 4.2)

by christian.bauer＠jboss.com

Well, the EJB3 deployer will not scan your WAR for EJBs. So you can't have EJBs in there. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4037823#4037823 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4037823

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Persistence, JBoss/CMP, Hibernate, Database] - Re: Help on Named Query

by scout1lacno

Hi elsieq, May you please post your code? FYI: On my previous code, it seems that you can only use '%' on strings. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4037822#4037822 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4037822

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Performance Tuning] - Re: Clustered JBoss with Cisco Content Switch

by genman

Session timeout? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4037819#4037819 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4037819

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Performance Tuning] - Re: please suggest a startegy

by genman

My late reply: Typically if a multi-threaded app only runs on a single processor, it is possible your application has a high degree of resource contention. Or simply you aren't executing work in multiple threads. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4037818#4037818 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4037818

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Pros/Cons of war vs. ear deployments (Jboss 4.2)

by stu2

I'd like to switch to a war deployment to take advantage of Seam's dynamic classloader enhancements. Using Jboss, are there any capabilities that will be lost? I'd like access to the full EJB 3 stack, will be using messaging, etc. Or is it really just a matter of packaging? Thanks, Stu View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4037817#4037817 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4037817

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user April 2007