[Messaging, JMS & JBossMQ] - Re: import org.jboss.mq.server.jmx.Queue
by milind.uc
I would like to thanks the way you reply me its pleasurable.... Well still I am working on the same track as I said previouslly that I am getting the problem with the geMessagecounter() metod that will get soloved as I used inside the session stateless bean......
Well but still I alwayes get the values zero for getScheduledMessage and still didnt know how to count that how many messages receiver acepted..
Rigth now I am working on the notfications ..As soon as the messages comes into the queue I want to do the automatic udpation for statastics of how many shceduled .pending and recived which will then dipalyed to user in the gui..
Well now I am going to used Message Drievrn Bean as I am also not o much familliar with it and want o chech the behaviour of the onMessage Method I think that method itsellf migth give me soloution and tyes there is method og queueMbean.addNotificationListener(). This method I am not able to used because of theire parameters.
Well if uyou have any suggestions for the notifcation then please sufggeset me :)
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4033888#4033888
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4033888
19Â years
[JBoss jBPM] - Re: GPD 3.0.9 Freezes Upon Opening Sample Process
by alllle
"koen.aers(a)jboss.com" wrote : Guys,
|
| Did you use a *fresh* eclipse installation with the 3.0.13 plugin installed?
| Don't try to 'upgrade' as there is probably trash in your installation/workspace that produces the problem.
|
| Regards,
| Koen
Mine is not an upgrade of GPD. I manually removed all GPD related packages from the plugin dir before expanding the new version. However, I do uses many other plugins. I will try an *clean* install after rushing my deadline and will post the result here.
Meanwhile, however, I do think this requirement is not very valid. It assumes that we should not use other plugins but GPD. While in reality, as enterprise developers, we will be using many plugins together to get the job done.
Frankly, if GPD and another plugin conflicts and results in the problem, it may or may not caused by GPD. The reason I, and other people, post it here is because the behavior is associated with saving a GPD design file, and my thread dump shows that the main thread is using 100% CPU while executing GPD classes during the freeze.
I hope my thread dump can shed light on the cause of the problem, and will try to help as much as possible. It's a great product and I wish it becomes better and better.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4033884#4033884
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4033884
19Â years
[JBoss Seam] - Re: problem with Conversation scope
by surajmundadaï¼ yahoo.com
Hi,
thanks for replying.
we are using conversation scope to display the previous pages (without loss of state) when user clicks the browser Back button.
I am not sure if I can specify scope of a variable seperately in Seam 1.0.0 GA (Please correct me if I am wrong) In that case, scope of that variable should be same as the scope of the seam component in which it is defined.
now, the problem I am facing with conversation scope is some of seam variables, after they are outjected are availabe throughout the application while some are not. As a workaround, we have to explicitly set those variables in the session context and fetch them back at the required place.
Till now, it's working fine. But we don't want many workarounds of this type.
Also, my problem of factory methods getting called when other methods of session bean are executed has not solved yet.
Has it to do anything with Conversation scope ?
Is it possible that DataModel ( or other variables for which factory method are defined) looses it's value after one request execution (in conversation scope ) and because it has no value when request comes to that bean again, factory method gets executed ?
waiting for reply,
suraj
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4033882#4033882
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4033882
19Â years