May 2007 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Creating Mock for identity component

by gavin.king＠jboss.com

What you are doing should work. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4048256#4048256 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4048256

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: Un expected behavior observed with Token details

by mputz

Please disregard my previous comment - it has nothing to do with configuration. I oversaw that you were throwing an exception, but didn't mark the current transaction as to be rolled back. So instead of your workaround of re-setting the node on the context again, just add jbpmContext.setRollbackOnly() in the catch block. public void processWorkflowEvent(long pid, String eventName) throws ... | { | JbpmConfiguration jbpmConfiguration = JbpmConfiguration.getInstance(); | JbpmContext jbpmContext = jbpmConfiguration.createJbpmContext(); | try | { | ... your own code | | // process signal | token.signal(eventName); | | } | catch(Exception e) | { | // mark this transaction as dirty | jbpmContext.setRollbackOnly(); | // do whatever you need to handle own exceptions | } | finally | { | jbpmContext.close(); | } | } No need for a JIRA entry IMO. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4048255#4048255 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4048255

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Need some clarification about seam-gen-ed EntityHome cla

by gavin.king＠jboss.com

No true, it looks to me like Widget has many Feeds. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4048254#4048254 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4048254

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: s:validateAll in custom tag/template

by carloszaniolo

Hi, I think it is same issue I had. Seam validation does not work with facelets source tags: http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4012572#4012572 But for the next version of Seam, it will have a new El implementation: JBoss El. Hopefully it will resolve our problems! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4048253#4048253 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4048253

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: s:validateAll throwing

by gavin.king＠jboss.com

s:validate(All) can only work for JSF controls which have an attribute named "value". (It is meant to be used with EditableValueHolders.) I'm not sure what ui2:addRemove is, but you seem to be missing a value attribute... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4048252#4048252 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4048252

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Portal] - Re: error changing theme when logged in as admin in 2.6cr2

by thomas.heute＠jboss.com

Could you please detail, what problem you are facing, and how i can reproduce it ? Thanks View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4048251#4048251 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4048251

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Unable to stop conversation propagation for <s:link acti

by gavin.king＠jboss.com

When you use action="...." with no view attribute, s:link resubmits to the original view id, just like h:commanLink or h:commandButton. Since you have <begin-conversation/> defined for that view id, a new conversation begins. If you want to submit to a different view id, you must use view="...". View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4048249#4048249 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4048249

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: Un expected behavior observed with Token details

by mputz

I could reproduce this with your suggestions of throwing an exception in an ActionHandler. But only if I signal this from a custom application, not from within the default jBPM 3.2 web app. So I suspect this is a configuration issue. I'll try to dig deeper and let you know when I find something... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4048245#4048245 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4048245

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossCache] - Re: Readme for required libs missing from archive?

by manik.surtani＠jboss.com

I've created a JIRA for this - JBCACHE-1072. Will be in 2.0.0.CR2. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4048244#4048244 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4048244

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossCache] - jboss-archive-browsing vs jboss-common-core

by atijms

I'm trying to use JbossCache 2.0.0 cr1 in a project that also uses Hibernate (with EntityManager 3.3.1 ga). There seems to be a conflict between the dependencies of these. Hibernate-EntityManager comes with a jar file called jboss-archive-browsing.jar. In its manifest it sais it's actually jboss-common-core 2.0.2 alpha. JBossCache 2.0.0 cr1 on the other hand comes with a jar file called jboss-common-core. There is no version information whatshowever in its manifest. When comparing these two, they seem mostly the same, although there are a couple of differences. E.g. org.jboss.util.file.ArchiveBrowserFactory exists in the jboss-common-core that comes with JbossCache but not in the one that comes with Hibernate-EntityManager. What version of jboss-common-core does JbossCache 2.0.0 cr1 comes with? Is there any effort going on to somehow align the different Jboss projects? Is it possible at all to use Hibernata-entitymanager 3.3.1 ga (the current one) with JbossCache, considering these conflicting dependencies? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4048243#4048243 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4048243

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user May 2007