I created a website with the .seam extension but found that although my site was indexed by Google and Yahoo, it was not cached. I changed the extension for seam pages to .html and then Google and Yahoo no longer indexed the site at all. Because the jsf components render xhtml elements I think maybe the engines are " unhappy" with the use of the .html extension (although MSN works fine). At the moment I'm going back to the .seam extension. Please share your experiences and insights in this regard. Thank you.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4054419#4054419
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4054419
So here :
| <table>
| <tr>
| <td>
| <h:commandButton value="#{bundle.speichern}" action="#{mitarbeiterAction.speichern}" />
|
| </td>
| <td>
| <h:commandButton value="Upload Dialog" action="#{laufzettelBean.erfassungShowUpload}"/>
| </td>
| <td>
| <h:commandButton value="#{bundle.abbrechen}" action="#{mitarbeiterAction.abbrechen}" />
| </td>
| <td>
| <h:commandButton value="#{bundle.start}" action="#{mitarbeiterAction.start}" />
| </td>
| </tr>
|
if I click on the Button "speichern" ,it comes back no anwser and no error.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4054413#4054413
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4054413
"roccolocko" wrote : Although you do can make some validation of this variables with bean shell, I would recomend that you make the validations before you put them on jbpm, for example with Validator in case you are using JSF.
That's my ideia! But I need to have something at process design level that tells what can of validation I will apply to a variable.
I'm wondering on the process definition where would be the best place for that on the process definition.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4054411#4054411
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4054411
