Every other workflow system I've worked with has had a Queue domain object, which is a persistent named repository for tasks. They are used in both push and pull assignment models, and provide a point of control and extensibility to address specific task-management needs.
Actor pools are not the same, because they are per-task-instance. For example, if a group of people pull tasks from a common task pool fed by multiple inputs, there's no way, beyond modifying the individual task-instances and driving process definitions, to, say, replace Huey and Dewey with Mickey and Minnie when Huey and Dewey fly south for the winter.
Am I missing something?
-Ed Staub
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4052811#4052811
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4052811
I did suspect this :(
What we need to do is to make user composable pages (like netvibes, but other users should be able to visit your "portal" too).
The problem then becomes that there can be X amounts of any form/subview and that they need to be seprated somehow.
We have been trying to adapt jboss portal to do this for us but that didnt work out since our cells on the page would want to interact with eachother and we would like a seam session context shared amongst the portlets+ some other things.
Does anyone have a hint how to do this or if there is a suitable library for that works with seam/facelets.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4052805#4052805
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4052805
If I understand correctly, in order to generate table ids on Oracle, the hibernate-generated DDL specifies one single sequence :
create sequence hibernate_sequence;
That means that successive values for, say, deployed processes JBPM_PROCESSDEFINITION can be as far away from each other as 1 from 15000 (given that the same sequence generator is used for the lines in the JBPM_LOG table too)
Do you feel that this is not a problem, is there a way to work around it or is it simply my imperfect configuring & compiling the current CVS ?
Thank you.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4052803#4052803
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4052803
