June 2007 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Deployment Scanner framework

by colintoal

Cool - I'm glad its on the plan for the future - as the Scanner facility is nice. One thought I had is to use a meta-annotation to represent "scan discoverable". One could annotate the annotation that indicates why the class is being discovered with it. I'm imagining something like: | public @interface @ScanDiscoverable | { | String value() default ""; // resource token ? like seam.properties ? necessary ? | } | | ... | // Seam example | @ScanDiscoverable | public @interface Name | ... | This provides the ability to extend the Scanner's discoverable classes with new annotations (like my @JCRContentItem annotation). Then the Scanner could be extended with Pre and Post Scan hooks (also discovered during scanning): public @interface ExecutePostScan | { | Annotation discoverable(); | } Methods (or Classes ? I'm not quite sure yet) bearing this annotation would have to implement a contract like | @ExecutePostScan(discoverable=JCRContentItem) | public void executePostInitializeScan ( ServletContext ctx, Set<Class<Object>> ) This would give the new @ScanDiscoverable annotation implementor a clean post Scan hook. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4059360#4059360 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4059360

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Seam 2.0B1: turn off page parameter value validation

by gavin.king＠jboss.com

gotcha, you want to bypass the model-based validations. Good point. Add an issue to JIRA, please. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4059359#4059359 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4059359

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Seam 2.0B1: turn off page parameter value validation

by hstang

| <param name="description" value="#{myEntity.description}"/> | I don't want [myEntity.description] to be validated. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4059358#4059358 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4059358

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Deployment Scanner framework

by gavin.king＠jboss.com

No, not yet, but there is a JIRA issue asking for this and we are definitely going to open it up when we get time. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4059357#4059357 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4059357

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Identity getPassword...

by gavin.king＠jboss.com

The password gets nulled as soon as its used. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4059356#4059356 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4059356

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Seam 2.0B1: turn off page parameter value validation

by gavin.king＠jboss.com

Exactly what kind of validation don't you want running? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4059355#4059355 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4059355

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Data separation in multi tenant applications with seam

by gavin.king＠jboss.com

There is a concept of a "default restriction" for a filter in Hibernate XML. Not sure about the annotationized version. Ask Emmanuel. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4059354#4059354 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4059354

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Error using RuleBasedIdentity in Seam 2.0 beta 1

by tuxzilla

I am pretty sure I only have seam 2.0 jar in the classpath. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4059353#4059353 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4059353

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Deployment Scanner framework

by colintoal

Guys, Thanks for Seam.. enjoying it very much. For shiggles - I'm working on some code to wrap Jackrabbit in a manner similar to 'EJB3 Persistence'. My immediate goal is to annotate a POJO with some custom annotations and - at deploy time - have my code read the annotations from the compiled classes and generate JCR CND type specifier and register the type. The Seam Deployment Scanner Framework is perfect for this. Its even built in a way that can be easily extended. So here is my question - is there a public API I can use to extend this ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4059352#4059352 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4059352

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Persistence, JBoss/CMP, Hibernate, Database] - Re: GC problem ?

by vettori

I updated Jboss to 4.2.0GA that has hibernate 3.2.3 (3.2.1 entitymanager). Running the app three times now gives : [INFO ][memory ] 3.737-3.893: GC 456014K->4945K (5242880K), 155.649 ms [INFO ][memory ] 542.299: parallel nursery GC 1483183K->695999K (5242880K), 379.253 ms [INFO ][memory ] 2113.122: parallel nursery GC 1862122K->1075130K (5242880K), 536.939 ms [INFO ][memory ] 2732.543-2732.669: GC 1568837K->85502K (5242880K), 126.728 ms [INFO ][memory ] 5160.667: parallel nursery GC 1543572K->760980K (5242880K), 867.616 ms [INFO ][memory ] 5191.217: parallel nursery GC 1916236K->1131836K (5242880K), 811.969 ms [INFO ][memory ] 5222.067: parallel nursery GC 1916236K->1182604K (5242880K), 807.395 ms [INFO ][memory ] 5256.562: parallel nursery GC 2294636K->1509980K (5242880K), 813.308 ms [INFO ][memory ] 5358.185: parallel nursery GC 2589543K->1807080K (5242880K), 826.695 ms [INFO ][memory ] 5377.246: parallel nursery GC 2589480K->1857368K (5242880K), 832.857 ms [INFO ][memory ] 5396.206: parallel nursery GC 2902380K->2119980K (5242880K), 818.478 ms [INFO ][memory ] 5417.744: parallel nursery GC 3136880K->2352224K (5242880K), 826.093 ms [INFO ][memory ] 5506.212: parallel nursery GC 3347309K->2564781K (5242880K), 827.195 ms [INFO ][memory ] 5525.118: parallel nursery GC 3537258K->2777114K (5242880K), 829.615 ms [INFO ][memory ] 5543.997: parallel nursery GC 3729963K->3010539K (5242880K), 836.042 ms [INFO ][memory ] 5564.356: parallel nursery GC 3938352K->3239969K (5242880K), 833.441 ms so it's a lot better. I don't know if this is because of hibernate 3.2.3 or jboss and i really like to know. Can anybody help me to understand ? thank you View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4059351#4059351 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4059351

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user June 2007