June 2007 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss Seam] - How to force validation of Seam components bound to the UI t

by grettke_spdr

Hi folks, Due to our architecture we are binding Seam components to the UI that happen not to be JPA entities. Still, we would like to define the component validations using the Hibernate Validator annotations. Out of the box, when we use the validateAll tag, the validations don't get performed. My take on this is that since the component bound to the UI is not a JPA entity, the validation doesn't get run. As a work around, I added @Valid to the injection of this component into an action and @IfInvalid(outcome=Outcome.REDISPLAY) on the action method. This seems to force the validation, but now, the validation doesn't seem to get displayed nicely on the web page itself (for example if I add required=true to that component the decorator works correctly). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4058349#4058349 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4058349

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Seam 2.0 BETA

by gavin.king＠jboss.com

Note that this release was tested on the following platforms: * JBoss 4.2 * Tomcat 6.0 * GlassFish V2 and V1 * WLS 9.2 * OC4J 11g Technology Preview It can be made to run on JBoss 4.0.5 by upgrading the AS to support JSF 1.2 (instructions in the documentation). We have had problems deploying on WebSphere, which we are investigating. However, I just found a minor errata (ie. bug) in the jee5 example. You'll need to change web.xml, removing the EjbTransactionListener ejb-link, and replacing it with this: <ejb-local-ref> | <ejb-ref-name>jboss-seam-jee5/EjbTransaction/local</ejb-ref-name> | <ejb-ref-type>Session</ejb-ref-type> | <local>org.jboss.seam.transaction.LocalEjbTransaction</local> | <ejb-link>EjbTransaction</ejb-link> | </ejb-local-ref> View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4058348#4058348 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4058348

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: async pain

by estaub

See (lengthy) update on http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-983 -Ed Staub View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4058347#4058347 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4058347

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Parametrized Method Expression: only with facelets?

by gavin.king＠jboss.com

Use Seam2. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4058346#4058346 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4058346

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Parametrized Method Expression: only with facelets?

by bgrossi

Why Seam's parametrized method expression only work with Facelets? I want to use SeamExpressionFactory and ParamMethodExpression whithout Facelets and I can't.. I think it can work well whithout Facelets, no? There are any plans to remove facelets' dependency on this API? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4058345#4058345 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4058345

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

SQL Transaction active very long

by FEj

Hi guys, I've problem with long sql transaction active and I want kill this one. In many case I've query long plus 20 minutes, and this cause a db slowness. Can I kill transaction active for plus 15 minutes? Thanks FEj PS: sorry for my english ;-)

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Portal] - Question about sessions in the portal

by glarenzie

Session is created in login and joined post login but recreated after header and tabs.jsp <true/false> The reason I believe this to be true is I get the same session ID all the way through the process however the session create date changes for the session object when accessed from a portlet, and the attributes associated with the original session object are all gone. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4058344#4058344 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4058344

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossWS] - disabling wsdl publication

by chlong

I am currently running a fresh install of JBoss 4.2.0. I am using JBossWS with EJB3 for web services. I have reviewed the WebContext annotation, but it does not appear to provide a way to suppress the publication of the wsdl on server startup (only allows me to secure it). I understand the wsdl can be secured, but would like it not to be published at all in our production environment. Is this possible? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4058343#4058343 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4058343

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: params in pageflows?

by Delphi's Ghost

Oviously that should have been : | String returnHome() { | return homePage; | } | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4058342#4058342 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4058342

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: params in pageflows?

by Delphi's Ghost

I think view-ids are used as identifiers as much as a url, hence there is no EL interpolation done on them. If you notice, anywhere a view is referenced for redirection, the parameters for the view are separate as opposed to part of the view-id. I did think about my problem and whether EL offered a solution as a way to pass params. Begin able to write: | <redirect view="/pages/viewItem.xhtml?itemId=#{item.id}"/> | would be cool, but impossible I think. However, I think it should be possible to do what you want by returning the view-id from an action method : | @In | private String homePage; | | void returnHome() { | return homePage; | } | | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4058340#4058340 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4058340

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user June 2007