[JBoss Tools (users)] - How to configure javadoc with JbossIDE2.0/eclipse
by mmcelarn
Hi,
I downloaded and unpacked jboss4-javadoc-4.0.4-4jpp.noarch.rpm.
I have installed eclipse - wtp-all-in-one-sdk-R-2.0-200706260303-win32.zip
When I unpacked the javadocs, I get a bunch of subdirectories. I tried to configure my project with javadoc ( right click the project in Package Explorer | properties | Javadoc location) with file:/C:/path_to_javadoc_root_dir_jboss4-4.0.4/ and I click validate, I get a message:
Location might be invalid. Files package-list and index.html that are typically available at the root of a documentation created by the Javadoc tool have not been found.
Trouble is, there are about twenty subdirs like aspects/ cluster/ etc each of which have a package-list and index.html.
How do I configure all of these javadoc dirs with my project so I have context sensitive help etc within eclipse?
Thanks for the help, Michael
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4067948#4067948
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4067948
18Â years, 9Â months
[JBoss Seam] - Re: Evaluation of action attibute in s:link
by dmitriy.lapko
Do you mean:
instead of trying to do:
<s:link action="#{someBean.someMethod(someValue)}" .../>
to use:
<s:link action="#{someBean.someMethod}">
| <f:param name="nameForMapping" value="#{someValue}"/>
| </s:link>
|
?
And in someMethod implementation just read this value and call what you need?
(Just to finish this conversation)
By the way, I managed to implement idea with double-interpolation, so now I can write:
<s:link dynaAction="#{'itemBrowseList'}.#{'browseAll'}">#{messages['submenu.browse.all']}</s:link>
or
<s:link dynaAction="itemBrowseList.browseAll">#{messages['submenu.browse.all']}</s:link>
or
<s:link dynaAction="#{'itemBrowseList.browseAll'}">#{messages['submenu.browse.all']}</s:link>
and it works like
<s:link action="#{itemBrowseList.browseAll}">#{messages['submenu.browse.all']}</s:link>
It was a nasty hack into Facelets, just to check this idea, I don't think I will use it in production :)
But for history:
I made changes in 2 classes in jsf-facelets.jar:
added to class com.sun.facelets.tag.TagAttribute method
public MethodExpression getMethodPreEvaluationExpression(FaceletContext ctx, Class type,
| Class[] paramTypes) {
| try {
| ExpressionFactory f = ctx.getExpressionFactory();
|
| ValueExpression valueExpression = this.getValueExpression(ctx, type);
|
| return new TagMethodExpression(this, f.createMethodExpression(ctx,
| "#{"+(String)valueExpression.getValue(ctx)+"}", type, paramTypes));
| } catch (Exception e) {
| throw new TagAttributeException(this, e);
| }
| }
and 2 internal classes into com.sun.facelets.tag.jsf.ActionSourceRule:
final static class DynaActionMapper extends Metadata {
|
| private final TagAttribute attr;
|
| public DynaActionMapper(TagAttribute attr) {
| this.attr = attr;
| }
|
| public void applyMetadata(FaceletContext ctx, Object instance) {
| ((ActionSource) instance).setAction(new LegacyMethodBinding(
| this.attr.getMethodPreEvaluationExpression(ctx, String.class,
| ActionSourceRule.ACTION_SIG)));
| }
| }
|
| final static class DynaActionMapper2 extends Metadata {
|
| private final TagAttribute attr;
|
| public DynaActionMapper2(TagAttribute attr) {
| this.attr = attr;
| }
|
| public void applyMetadata(FaceletContext ctx, Object instance) {
| ((ActionSource2) instance).setActionExpression(this.attr
| .getMethodPreEvaluationExpression(ctx, String.class,
| ActionSourceRule.ACTION_SIG));
| }
|
| }
|
also changed its method public Metadata applyRule(String name, TagAttribute attribute, MetadataTarget meta) for support of dynaAction attribute:
| if ("dynaAction".equals(name)) {
| if (elSupport && meta.isTargetInstanceOf(ActionSource2.class)) {
| return new DynaActionMapper2(attribute);
| } else {
| return new DynaActionMapper(attribute);
| }
| }
It's crazy, yeh?
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4067946#4067946
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4067946
18Â years, 9Â months