July 2007 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Do the examples shipped with 1.2.1.GA run on 4.2.1?

by fquimbay

Greetings, jtyrrell ... You can follow this howto: http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=Running2.6WithJBossAS4.2.xAndMyF... I always do this steps when I want to run a project with JBoss 4.2.x, JBoss Seam 1.2.1 and MyFaces 1.1.5. And works fine. -- fabio quimbay View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4067150#4067150 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4067150

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Benefits of extended persistence context with SFSB

by p2auljr

It seems to me that the benefits of a extended persistence context with a stateful session bean are lost when having to deal with the issue of a sfsb being passivated by the container. If a sfsb has a reference to a managed entity, the sfsb is passivated, and then the sfsb is activated, you may still run into Lazy Initialization exceptions because the entity is no longer managed, unless you explicitly merge the entity back into the persistence context. What is the best way to handle this issue? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4067149#4067149 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4067149

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Bijection clarification

by monkeyden

This is still a gray area for me. I have not seen a clear and complete description of the implied scopes. Does it default to: The scope of the bijected component, if any? The bean which is injecting it? Conversation unless specified otherwise? Find in any scope? Thus far, I have always specified a scope for @Out, to be clear, but outside of that personal style, it's trial and error. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4067148#4067148 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4067148

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Microcontainer] - Re: How do you override the source for configuration propert

by rbuckvrsn

anonymous wrote : XML always has that problem. Sounds like we have to modify the microcontainer, and rebuild JBoss to suit our needs. Fallback to microkernel system-properties is required to enable people to migrate off the old Oracle based properties manager and migrate to the new system. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4067147#4067147 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4067147

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Bijection clarification

by smithbstl

Ok, this is weird. I had Address declared like this | //sfsb A | | @In(required=false) | @Out(required=false) | private Address address | | and Address kept nulling or falling out of scope more likley when I changed it to this | //sfsb A | | @In(required=false) | @Out(scope=ScopeType.CONVERSATION, required=false) | private Address address | | it all works. I thought that components shared the same state as the sfsb which was Conversation by default. I am using Seam 1.3 Alpha View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4067146#4067146 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4067146

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: 3.2.1 jbpm.jpdl.postgresql.sql

by andyredhead

Thanks for the example, I used something similar myself ;) I don't run plsql in auto-commit mode, so I wrapped the script with BEGIN/COMMIT - but as soon as you get an error inside a transaction you have to roll back, hence removing the drop statements. It's nice to know that there are other people using PostgreSQL (I'm on 8.2). Cheers, Andy View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4067145#4067145 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4067145

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Evaluation of action attibute in s:link

by gavin.king＠jboss.com

locale is the name of a built-in component. Name your page-scoped variable something else. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4067144#4067144 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4067144

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Bijection clarification

by smithbstl

Ok, what I am struggling with is I have a component, Address, that is just a POJO, not an entity. It is submitted via a form. It's inject into sfsb A which then outjects it. By the time sfsb B comes along, the Address component is null. Both A and B exist in a long running conversation. Address never even shows up on the seam debug page. Thanks for your help. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4067143#4067143 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4067143

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Seam JARs in system classpath?

by toddh

Just wondering if anyone else is concerned with packaging so many Seam JARs into each web-app? In our Struts applications the JARs are also packaged with the application and we've had trouble convincing people to upgrade their libraries to stay current. On the other hand we've upgraded the application server multiple times and never had much trouble getting people to test/update apps for newer libraries packaged with the app server. It seems easier if I can deploy a single version of Seam to match the app server and keep them in step. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4067140#4067140 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4067140

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - All RIGHT, ALL RIGHT PEOPLE, ATTENTION, Who ever fixed <s:co

by dhinojosa

I love you. ;) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4067139#4067139 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4067139

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user July 2007