Hi,
there's a nice oc4j-feature we use in our EAR-design called parent-child-relations. We have a core-application and an administration-application and optionally 0-n other applications which all require classes of the core-application. Up to now we simply set Java2ClassLoadingCompliance and UseJBossWebLoader to "true". I just wonder if there's a better way to simulate the oc4j-feature in jboss. Is there?
Thanks and kind regards,
Stefan
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4074844#4074844
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4074844
"stephen.friedrich" wrote : I'd like to complain at JetBrains support that Idea does not recognize the short aliases (e.g. "identity") for fully qualified components names ("org.jboss.seam.security.identity").
| However I can't find where those aliases are configured.
This has recently been rewritten from aliasing (up to and including Seam2 Beta) to imports (Seam CVS, http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-1693) and is still a work in progress (will be finished for CR1).
anonymous wrote : Also I noticed that the docs (3.2.7 Component Names) use this:
| #{com.jboss.myapp.loginAction.login}
| Has the syntax changed with JBoss EL? Previously it had to be
| #{com$jboss$myapp$loginAction.login}
| If so: How are ambiguities resolved?
Jacob/Gavin fixed this a while ago (pre JBoss EL), IIRC the magic is in SeamELResolver.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4074830#4074830
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4074830
I'd like to complain at JetBrains support that Idea does not recognize the short aliases (e.g. "identity") for fully qualified components names ("org.jboss.seam.security.identity").
However I can't find where those aliases are configured.
Doc says it's in the seam jar's components.xml, but that only contains imports that I can't resolve to anything sensible. There's no systematic reference section for the components.xml format in the Seam docs. The components-2.0.xsd also has no comments.
Also I noticed that the docs (3.2.7 Component Names) use this:
#{com.jboss.myapp.loginAction.login}
Has the syntax changed with JBoss EL? Previously it had to be
#{com$jboss$myapp$loginAction.login}
If so: How are ambiguities resolved?
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4074826#4074826
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4074826