January 2008 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Manager.switchConversation via Ajax4JSF actionListener d

by objectbay

Hello again, I have put a call to ConversationEntry.unlock() into my AJAX handler, and now conversation switching seems to work reliably: public void actionMenuSelectionChanged() { | ConversationEntry ce = Manager.instance().getCurrentConversationEntry(); | if (ce != null && ce.isLockedByCurrentThread()) { | ce.unlock(); | } | if (ActionMenuItems.NEU_LEBEN.toString().equals(actionMenuSelection)) { | Manager.instance().leaveConversation(); | Manager.instance().beginConversation("navigator"); | Manager.instance().redirect(Views.LEBEN_BERECHNUNG.toString()); | } | } Does that look like a plausible solution? It seems to me that Manager.leaveConversation(), which in turn calls initializeTemporaryConversation() doesn't unlock the current conversation, possibly leaving it in a locked state. Can anyone confirm this hypothesis? regards, Karl View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4121789#4121789 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4121789

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: process variables - how to acces

by mwohlf

Hey, are you complaining about my post? ;-) with 'somehow' I ment to use any of the following methods: | ExecutionContext.setVariable(name, value) | TaskInstance.setVariableLocally(name, value) // inherited from VariableContainer | ContextInstance.createVariable(key, object, ooken); | as far as i understand setVariableLocally() creates a variable only visible in the task instance, but i am still new to jBPM and try to figure out things... Regards View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4121786#4121786 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4121786

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Installation, Configuration & DEPLOYMENT] - TLD's aren't loades from jars in classpath

by helix

Hi, I use JBoss AS 4.2.2.GA and deployed 2 WAR's (expanded) in the JBoss\server\default\deploy directory. I use some JAR archives (like struts.jar) that are common to both web apps, so I copied them into JBoss\server\default\lib, the TLD files are in the META-INF directories of these JAR's and are referenced in the JSP's by their absolute URI e.g. http://struts.apache.org/tags-bean. Now, I get always the error: ServletException in '/layout.jsp': The absolute uri: http://struts.apache.org/tags-bean cannot be resolved in either web.xml or the jar files deployed with this application Now I wonder why their not found, because the JBoss\server\default\lib directory is stated as a shared lib directory for all applications by the docs. Maybe someone can give me an explanation. Regards helix View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4121782#4121782 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4121782

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: expression language empty parameter

by EverlastX1

Thank you, Did try it but without any changes If s:link is used function gets called with the null parameter with h:commandLink function is not called at all. | | <!DOCTYPE composition PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" | "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> | <ui:composition xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" | xmlns:s="http://jboss.com/products/seam/taglib" | xmlns:ui="http://java.sun.com/jsf/facelets" | xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core" | xmlns:h="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html" | xmlns:rich="http://richfaces.org/rich" | xmlns:a="http://richfaces.org/a4j" | template="layout/template.xhtml"> | | <ui:define name="body"> | | <h:form> | <h:inputText id="value" required="false" value="#{searcher.searchString}" style=" width : 300px; "/> | <h:commandButton id="search" value="search" action="#{searcher.search}" style="width : 50px; "/> | </h:form> | |  | <h:form> | <h:dataTable var="resultElem" value="#{searchResult}"> | <h:column> | |  | <h:outputText value="Creator:" rendered="#{not empty resultElem.doc.creator}" /> | <ui:repeat var="a" value="#{resultElem.doc.creator}" > | <s:link value="[#{a}]," action="#{searcher.searchByCreator(a)}" /> | <h:commandLink value="[#{a}]," action="#{searcher.searchByCreator(a)}" /> | </ui:repeat> | | </h:column> | </h:dataTable> | </h:form> | | | </ui:define> | </ui:composition> | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4121781#4121781 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4121781

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Tools (users)] - Re: Error when opening richfaces file in Eclipse with Fedora

by max.andersen＠jboss.com

I then don't know it works fine on my fedora 6 and fedora 8 and same outofbox worked on red hat 4 and red hat 5. I have not seen your error before. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4121780#4121780 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4121780

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Tools (users)] - Re: model -> action dependencies in seam module

by max.andersen＠jboss.com

"classloader requirements that aren't there when you are still in Eclipse" why should they be different when using an ide ? No IDE I know have magical superpowers ,) if you think hot deployment should be an option then open a request in jira. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4121779#4121779 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4121779

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Tools (users)] - Re: GDI leak in FreeMarker IDE

by max.andersen＠jboss.com

we haven't changed anything in the freemarker IDE for a long time so i doubt it has gone away. Anyone that figures out what is causing it is encouraged to open up an issue in jira about it. Thanks View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4121778#4121778 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4121778

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: variable validation

by twiceknightly

kukeltje, thanks for the reply. So you are saying that you perform validation before it enters jbpm and not, for example, within an action handler? My idea was a very generic framework where you declare the variables you have in each task and how they should be validated in an XML file. With regards to the model you are saying treat the variables in the process as temporary state and when you reach the appropriate node i.e. some end state, then transform the individual variables into your pojo and then passing the pojo to your own service to be persisted? Your definition of "naff" is correct :). Apologies for using such colloquial english. I take your point regarding making jbpm the process not the model. Your example of a tasklist is a good one and indeed that is what I'm doing for the tasklist. However if you seperate your layers e.g. a webapp calling and EJB that utilises jbpm then a call to signal may traverse a number of nodes in the graph. This update in the state of the process needs to be communicated to the UI so that it may show the appropriate view for say the current task. I haven't looked at Seam at all. Would Seam simplify integration between a webapp and and ejb using jbpm? What would be passed between the two layers. Currently we have shared DTOs between the webapp and the EJB. Again thanks for the time, your response has been most helpful. regards Richard. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4121774#4121774 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4121774

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: @Conversational vs. @Remove

by pete.muir＠jboss.org

Yes. Try using conversation-required in pages.xml instead. It's probably more what you are after (requires that the page is accessed inside a lrc). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4121772#4121772 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4121772

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: SFSB vs. JavaBean

by pete.muir＠jboss.org

@Stateful or @Stateless make it an EJB3 Seam component. It can be a plain Seam component without them. Yes, you are mixing up the defaulting rules for scope that come with @Stateful/@Stateless and the scope fo the Seam component. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4121771#4121771 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4121771

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user January 2008