[JBoss Seam] - Trinidad Integration Issue
by raoul.schmidiger
Hi all
I'ÂÂm struggling with the integration of Apache Trinidad 1.2.5 into our existing web-application that uses SEAM 2.0.0GA + Richfaces 3.1.4GA so far. I adapted all configuration settings from the seamdiscs example.
The application works and I can use the Trinidad controls. However when I request a page that includes Richfaces components for the first time JBoss shows to following message in the console:
17:05:20,160 ERROR [STDERR] 30.01.2008 17:05:20 org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.renderkit.core.CoreRenderKit createResponseWriter SCHWERWIEGEND: No RenderingContext has been created.
This message is not shown upon further requests. But no matter if I request the page for the first time or later the functionality of the commandButtons is broken. If I click on one of them the page just gets rerendered without executing the method specified with the action attribute of the button. Using the Trinidad libraries coming with the seamdiscs example (1.2.1) the error is not shown in the console. However switching back to the old library does not fix the issue with the commandButtons. Everything works smoothly as before when I remove the default-render-kit-id entry in the faces-config.xml file. But obviously this poses that the Trinidad controls can no longer be rendered. â Thus this is not an applicable solution.
Has anybody got these components to work together? Any help is highly appreciated.
Thank you very much!
Raoul
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4124893#4124893
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4124893
18 years, 2 months
[JBoss Seam] - Re: Poll: what JSF framework are you using with Seam?
by trouby
Hey,
In my opinion, Richfaces works best with Seam as it is tested very well, we have built a huge application based on Richfaces and it works perfectly,
I think the integration between RF and Ajax4Jsf is best and you can find beneficial from both world together and combine nice stuff with RF/a4j, more than that, it's all under the same house which is important if you plan to purchase support some when,
Regarding your question, I also tested Myfaces / Icefaces with Seam and it worked very nice as Seam is not binded in any way to RF or any other specific JSF components library, in a matter of fact, I sometimes I use Seam without any relationship to the JSF world :-)
Well, check the examples, Icefaces works and it's active, same goes for Trinindad,Myfaces (I tested it very long time ago but it might still work),
There are very very nice components library named 'Woodstock', but I have encountered many problems while trying to use them with Seam,
I think Gavin somewhere before a year replied me that they are working on it together to make Woodstock work with Seam but I didn't see anything new about it(but I might be wrong),
Well, at the end, after all the nice specs and standards, Seam works best under Jboss, RF works best with Seam/Jboss, Woodstock works best with Glassfish, Oracle goes with Trinidad and thats the way it works,
(I'm not saying they cannot be combined, I just say it's harder)
Well, at least that is from my own experience :-)
Asaf.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4124891#4124891
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4124891
18 years, 2 months
[JBoss Seam] - Seam + Ajax4JSF - The conversation ended, timed out or was
by trouby
Hey,
I'm not sure yet why, but sometimes ajax calls are being processed very slowly for me,
So if the user press another button while an ajax call is being processed, I get:
The conversation ended, timed out or was processing another request,
It is of course logical, but since sometimes I have very big forms I prefer not to break the whole form submission somehow,
I tried the ajax4jsf queues but it didn't have any affect,
Is there anyway to handle ajax calls better than just break the whole page submission?
Thanks,
Asaf.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4124885#4124885
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4124885
18 years, 2 months