January 2008 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss Messaging] - Re: Messaging 1.3 Clustering question

by nbakizada

The second oddity I noticed is this: Failover will occur cleanly if I kill -9 one of the 2 nodes' process. On the other hand, doing a graceful shutdown of the appserver on a given node will NOT trigger failover. Any messages that were held on that given queue will NOT appear on the other site. Why is that? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4120686#4120686 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4120686

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Messaging] - Re: Messaging 1.3 Clustering question

by nbakizada

Ok. That makes sense in terms of the local consumption. There are a couple more oddities in running clustered messaging (I'm on 1.4 now). I'm having trouble understanding if the 2 nodes in a cluster act as some sort of primary/secondary, or if they're both equal primaries. In the event of a basic failover (one of the 2 appservers goes down), things failover to the other just fine. But what happens if, say, both servers are running, but are somehow unable to connect to each over the network (so each thinks the other is unavailable). What happens to the messages stored in the shared database? Under normal circumstances, when node A held, let's say, 100 messages, and node A went down. The 100 messages would "appear" on Node B after failover was complete (being read from the shared database). What happens in the scenario where both servers stay up, but can't see each other on the network? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4120685#4120685 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4120685

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Persistence, JBoss/CMP, Hibernate, Database] - An array of enumerated types using annotations

by ijb

Can anyone shed some light on how can one define an array of enumerated types? I need to map the following class: | public class Proto { | public enum TransportMethod {HTTP, HTTPS, TELNET, SSH}; | | | private Set<TransportMethod> methods = new HashSet<TransportMethod>(0); | ...getters and setters.... | } | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4120683#4120683 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4120683

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: null pointer exception with fileUpload

by shane.bryzak＠jboss.com

SeamFilter already includes MultipartFilter, so no need to configure it explicitly. If you package up a minimal, deployable test case to JIRA (or e-mail to me directly) I'd be glad to take a look at the issue. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4120681#4120681 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4120681

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[EJB/JBoss] - 2 JBoss servers pointing to 1 database

by rmartinus

Hi all, Do you think it is a good idea to run 2 jboss servers pointing to the same database? One jboss would have one ear file, and the other one would have a newer version of ear file. The purpose is for certain users to be able to use new functionalities in one of the jboss servers, while leaving the rest of the users the older and the more stable ear file. If anyone has had a good or bad experience on this, please let me know. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4120679#4120679 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4120679

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Installation, Configuration & DEPLOYMENT] - Re: Incomplete Deployment listing (for the nth time)

by damien

I know this is an old topic, but I came across this same issue in a 4.2.2 install. The datasource needs to be modified in deploy/uuid-key-generator.sar/META-INF/jboss-service.xml -- Damien View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4120676#4120676 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4120676

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossWS] - Re: Adding application specific properties to the MessageCon

by kellenheller

I am trying to populate the properties in the client and read them in the server, either in the handler or in the service. I don't know what you mean by "transfer properties". The docs say you can get the RequestContext from the BindingProvider, add properties all on the client, and then that is accessible via the MessageContext on the server. But so far, no success :( View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4120673#4120673 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4120673

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Installation, Configuration & DEPLOYMENT] - Re: Creating Queue Connection Factory

by PeterJ

The connection factory is already there, no need to add one. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4120670#4120670 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4120670

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossCache] - CacheLoaderInterceptor behavior

by nnnnn

We're using a custom CacheLoader in a somewhat non-standard way. Our CacheLoader is read-only, and it's designed to get a node from a different server if not on the current server (the difference between it and the TcpDelegatingCacheLoader is that this cacheloader figures out where to go and get it). What the CacheLoaderInterceptor is doing that we don't want it to do is that when we put an object into a cache and that node doesn't exist in the local cache, it goes to CacheLoader to get that node before proceeding with the put. I understand the thought process behind this - if the CacheLoader is being used as a backing store, then you want to get the node back into memory before adding another key/value pair. However, we're not using it this way. I won't get into the details on why, but what we'd like is to have the CacheLoader "get" only be invoked on an explicit "get", and never on a "put". Functionally, this won't make a difference, but there will be a performance difference. Any suggestions on how this can be accomplished? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4120669#4120669 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4120669

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Security & JAAS/JBoss] - RMI & JBOSS

by markbabcock

I'm running the bungled version of jboss-portal-2.6.3. I have a class within my war file that makes an RMI call to an external app. I have tried using the command line args to run in java2 security. However, I'm still getting a security error. I'm running the bundled version of jboss with the portal. Any ideas? run -Djava.security.manager -Djava.security.policy=server.policy java.security.AccessControlException: access denied (java.net.SocketPermission 127.0.0.1:9001 connect,resolve) at java.security.AccessControlContext.checkPermission(AccessControlContext.java:323) at java.security.AccessController.checkPermission(AccessController.java:546) at java.lang.SecurityManager.checkPermission(SecurityManager.java:532) at java.lang.SecurityManager.checkConnect(SecurityManager.java:1034) at java.net.Socket.connect(Socket.java:513) at java.net.Socket.connect(Socket.java:469) at java.net.Socket.(Socket.java:366) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4120667#4120667 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4120667

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user January 2008