February 2008 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

by mendaye

Hello, I was trying to install jbossws-native-2.0.3.GA. Insatll instruction mention that... Copy ant.properties.examples to ant.properties Modify the target container location in ant.properties. Execute one of the following ant deploy-jboss40 However, I was not able to locate ant.properties.examples file? Where can I find it? Thanks, Surafel View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4126795#4126795 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4126795

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - loosing seam initialization (in particular injection) when u

by cyberanto

Env: Seam2.0.1.CR1/JBoss4.2.0/JBoss Development Studio/Windows XP I am having a problem with Injection failing to work for components which are programmatically added to the context, e.g. in the Action Class: Contexts.getSessionContext().set("catalogModel", newCatalog); the ModelClass: @Scope(SESSION) @Name("catalogModel") public class CatalogModel { @Logger private Log log; @In(create=true) private SkuDAO skuDao; etc. } log and skuDao are null; Of course, the class has been created using new CatalogModel() ... I have tried to obtain the Objects by Context.get() and Components.instance(), to no avail. Had to new them into existence. catalogModel and skuDao show up as Seam Components in the server log during startup and e.g. the correct catalogModel is available to the web application. (the object does get set into the Context). Any hints, suggestions? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4126794#4126794 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4126794

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Installation, Configuration & DEPLOYMENT] - Re: Deploying MyApp as default application on JBoss server

by mgk

THANK YOU Peter once again for all your help. This resolved my issues. I didn't know about that EULA until now. It is very strange. Probably, I'll switch to Linux. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4126793#4126793 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4126793

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: Is jBPM-BPEL GA backward compatible to beta 3?

by alex.guizar＠jboss.com

Can you test it on a new database to confirm this is a schema update issue? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4126792#4126792 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4126792

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: How to run jBPM-BPEL and JBoss 5.0.0Beta3

by alex.guizar＠jboss.com

We didn't test it on 5.0.0.Beta3. Indeed, it is not yet part of our target platforms as there is no high demand for it. However, by all means, add a feature request to our issue tracking system and we will schedule it in our road map. The more votes it gets, the sooner it will be delivered. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4126790#4126790 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4126790

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: Is jBPM-BPEL GA backward compatible to beta 3?

by meghanai_99

I think so too. This is upgraded database from older Beta3 to now GA. I have changed the hibernate config property to update schema but it seems to be not taking care of it. My setting is - | <property name="hibernate.hbm2ddl.auto">update</property> | If database upgrade doesn't work, it may prohibit us from taking up BPEL GA :( Thanks, Meghana. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4126788#4126788 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4126788

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - <s:conversationPropagation type=

by joeyxxx

This code worked prior to Seam 2.0.1GA. I've tested various combinations of seam and richfaces versions and 2.0.1 seems to be the culprit. With <s:conversationPropagation type="join" />: | <a4j:commandButton styleClass="btn" id="contactButton#{accountHolder}" oncomplete="UIControl('contactForm', 'contact', 'identification');" reRender="contactBlock#{accountHolder},uiSec" actionListener="#{accountOpen.submitContactInfo}" value="Continue" > | <a4j:actionparam name="holder" value="getSuffix()" noEscape="true"/> | <s:conversationPropagation type="join" /> | </a4j:commandButton> | | Renders the following: Notice that the onclick handler is rendered before the input is rendered and causes a document.getElementById("contactButton1") has no properties javascript error. | <div id="contactContinueSection1" style="padding: 10px 10px 10px 10px; display: block"> | | <script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript"> | //<![CDATA[ | document.getElementById('contactButton1').onclick = new Function("event", "{if (document.getElementById){var form = document.getElementById('contactForm1');var input = document.createElement('input');if (document.all){ input.type = 'hidden';input.name = 'conversationPropagation';input.value = 'join';}else if (document.getElementById) {input.setAttribute('type', 'hidden');input.setAttribute('name', 'conversationPropagation');input.setAttribute('value', 'join');}form.appendChild(input);return true;}}"); | //]]> | </script> | | <input id="contactButton1" name="contactButton1" onclick="A4J.AJAX.Submit('_viewRoot','contactForm1',event,{'parameters':{'holder':getSuffix(),'conversationPropagation':'join','contactButton1':'contactButton1'} ,'actionUrl':'/BaisiPrototype/AE/primary.jspv?javax.portlet.faces.DirectLink=true','oncomplete':function(request,event,data){UIControl('contactForm', 'contact', 'identification');}} );return false;" value="Continue" class="btn" type="button" /> | </div> | Without <s:conversationPropagation type="join" />, the onclick handler is rendered as an attribute of the button as ff: | <div id="contactContinueSection1" style="padding: 10px 10px 10px 10px; display: block"><input id="contactButton1" name="contactButton1" onclick="A4J.AJAX.Submit('_viewRoot','contactForm1',event,{'parameters':{'holder':getSuffix(),'contactButton1':'contactButton1'} ,'actionUrl':'/BaisiPrototype/AE/primary.jspv?javax.portlet.faces.DirectLink=true','oncomplete':function(request,event,data){UIControl('contactForm', 'contact', 'identification');}} );return false;" value="Continue" class="btn" type="button" /> | | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4126787#4126787 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4126787

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Multiple random rendering of facelet components

by gjeudy

No outstanding exception happens on the server side. The seam phase listener processes the request and renders the same page as the response without getting to my stateful ejb method execution. See page below: #{packageEditAction.selectReleasePackage} should resolve to my stateful bean method execution (none of the code has changed between the upgrade from seam 1.2.1 to seam 2.0. Any help would be greatly appreciated, Thanks, -Guillaume <ui:composition xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" | xmlns:ui="http://java.sun.com/jsf/facelets" | xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core" | xmlns:h="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html" | xmlns:s="http://jboss.com/products/seam/taglib" template="template.xhtml"> | | <ui:define name="body"> | | <script type="text/javascript" src="rdm.js"></script> | <h:messages /> | | <h:form id="packageForm"> | <fieldset> | <table border="1"> | <tr> | <td width="100%" colspan="3" align="center"> | <h4>Release Packages</h4> | </td> | </tr> | <tr> | <td width="50%"><b>Select a Release Package: </b> | </td> | </tr> | <tr> | <td width="50%"><h:selectOneListbox | id="existrel" value="#{relPkg}" required="false" size="20"> | <s:selectItems value="#{releasePackagesResult}" var="relPkg" | label="#{relPkg.releasePackageId}--#{relPkg.releasePackageNm}" /> | <s:convertEntity /> | </h:selectOneListbox></td> | </tr> | </table> | <h:commandButton value="Manage Release Package Items" | action="#{packageEditAction.selectReleasePackage}" /> | </fieldset> | </h:form> | </ui:define> | </ui:composition> View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4126786#4126786 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4126786

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[EJB 3.0] - Re: Stateless session bean pooling in JBoss

by isthisusernameavailable

I'm seeing a similar behavior where existing SLSB instances were not re-used as expected. My application has a MDB that contains an injected SLSB for use during the onMessage() method. When onMessage() is called, it appears that a new SLSB instance is constructed. The MDB itself seems to be re-used correctly, and I'm not seeing this object leakage when I have a SLSB injected into another SLSB -- it only occurs within the MDB. This thread seems to indicate that this may be a bug with ThreadLocalPool: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-1175?page=all Does using MaxStrictPool instead of ThreadLocalPool solve the problem? If so, can someone point me to some documentation about how to configure JBoss to use StrictMaxPool? What are the problems with using StrictMaxPool? Thanks, John View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4126785#4126785 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4126785

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Installation, Configuration & DEPLOYMENT] - Re: Deploying MyApp as default application on JBoss server

by PeterJ

Just noticed that you are running Windows Vista. You should re-read the EULA you agreed to when you installed Vista - it prohibits you from having more than 10 incoming connections. This means a maximum of 10 users can be (legally) connected to your web site at any one time. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4126784#4126784 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4126784

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user February 2008