[Installation, Configuration & DEPLOYMENT] - Re: Web App not running, getting a file download popup windo
by gbadavidson
I have attempted to run Jboss from the command prompt (RUN.bat). When I tried to run the the "run.bat" I received an error message saying the -server was not found in the JVM. I upgraded the JVM and ran the "run.bat" again, this time it started the batch file but the command window frose after a few seconds, the last line it displayed is:
[Log4jservice$URLWatchTimerTask] Configuring from URL: resourse:jboss-log4j.xml
I looked into the log in the sever dir but I see no entries for the time that I attempted to run the "run.bat"
I then started the server from within Jboss Developer Studio and it started correctly. However I am still getting the file download popup when attempting to run the web app. Please note that I went back and created a new project with the "kickstartwithout libs" which had worked earlier. I loaded that app onto the server and attempted to run it without any modifications. It is getting the file upload popup as well. I have uninstalled JBDevStudio and reloaded it and I am getting the same results. My next test will be to use a new workspace, create the quickstart from scratch again and then start the server.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4219205#4219205
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4219205
17 years, 1 month
[JBoss Tools (users)] - Re: seam-gen IDE vs Console
by bdlink
I think there are several issues here, but I am reinstalling everything at the moment and trying a Linux 64 stack so I am not sure of the situation since 3.0.GA (have been using the nightlies). When I was driving to work today, I was thinking that JBT/seam-gen integration was a big remaining issue, so was surprised to find a related topic already posted :-) Before I get started, congratulations to the JBT team on their 3.0 GA release! That is quite a milestone.
1. Last I looked, seam-gen had a few more features than JBT version (such as allowing generating the model separately from the UI CRUD) so it would be nice to take a seam-gen project, import it into JBT and run it from there. Seam-gen tells you to import the project (they do create an eclipse project) into eclipse as a general project. Doing that and adding the seam runtime in the properties file did not (last checked) allow using the JBoss tool to deploy the project to the server or use JBT tools to add new entities, etc. Without autodeploy you are slowed down a lot!
2. We have had issues with eclipse autobuild messing things up when using seam to deploy (since seam will also build things).
3. As I understand Dan Allen's blogs there are inherent differences between the way Eclipse builds a project (not using ant) and seam-gen (using ant). It would be nice to resolve this so it is not an issue.
4. seam-gen ear does not generate the multiple projects which have been the eclipse style for ear projects (and which JBT converted to a while ago). This is a seam issue that would be nice to "fix" (or a nice feature to add on the seam side).
As I read max.anderson's post, he does not seem to say that starting with a command-line seam-gen project, importing it into JBT and continuing with JBT works. He seems to be saying that starting with JBT and continuing with JBT works (I should hope so). Starting with seam-gen command line and staying with that also works.
I think the biggest confusion at the moment, is how plain seam and JBT can work together (if they can). If not, clarify that a seam-gen project can be imported into Eclipse but only if JBT is not installed. At the moment it looks like you have to stay with what you start from, JBT or seam-gen command line. After the huge effort to move to eclipse 3.4.2 (which is greatly appreciated), maybe more effort on JBT/seam-gen integration. I admit I do not understand the issues around ant versus WTP driven build/deploy and how hard that is to bridge. I am speaking as a user here.
Note that Dan Allen, in "Seam in Action" "Choosing an IDE" says "I find NetBeans easier to get into if you are a new user" I would hope this opinion can change, since NetBeans does not have the functionality that JBT has!
View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4219196#4219196
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4219196
17 years, 1 month