I get a null pointer exception while initializing cache . I am using jboss5.0.0G.A and jbosscache3.0.2.G.A
I find that RemoveOnEvictActionPolicy is the root cause. Is something wrong with the below configuration
<region name="/Opportunity" actionPolicyClass="org.jboss.cache.eviction.RemoveOnEvictActionPolicy" algorithmClass="org.jboss.cache.eviction.FIFOAlgorithm"
| eventQueueSize="100000">
| <property name="maxNodes" value="20" />
| <property name="timeToLive" value="3600000"/>
| </region>
View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4217718#4217718
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4217718
I correct what I've said. This web service war is developed for tomcat and it is successfully deployed and runned on tomact.
Since tomcat need an additional SOAP protocol stack which included in the web service war I mentioned above, I guess the problem is that the SOAP protocol stack provided in this web service war is conflicted with that on JBoss. One way to solve the problem is to replace the SOAP protocol stack by that provided in this web service war. Am I right?
Can anyone tell me where is the JBoss SOAP protocol stack jar in JBoss?
Thanks.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4217715#4217715
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4217715
"pete.muir(a)jboss.org" wrote :
| That we perform JSR-299 injection and interceptor binding into an EJB using a default interceptor. This should be called before any user interceptors.
So i guess, the Seam interceptor should be called irrespective of whether the user has defined any interceptors for the application. In that case, shouldn't the seam interceptor be defined/configured some place else (at server level) instead of the ejb-jar.xml which is per application?
View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4217711#4217711
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4217711