July 2009 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: is it possible to use jBPM with TopLink instead of Hiber

by melgamal

Nicolas, i faced the same problem about using jBPM in a project useing toplink as a presistance mapping , but i do it and it is working, realy i faced some problems about lib conflects but it solved. also take care about the application server u will delpoy on, if using OAS you will face a lot of problems. I'm still trying deploy under OAS 10g but didnt finished yet, whover deployed successfully under Tomcat6. Mohamed View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4243042#4243042 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4243042

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Remoting] - Re: Can not get connection to server - port out of range -1

by ron.sigal＠jboss.com

Hi Tom, It's not understanding the syntax "toms-d2003x64/10.1.3.10". Try "socket://toms-d2003x64:1600" or "socket://10.1.3.100:1600". -Ron View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4243040#4243040 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4243040

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Remoting] - Re: Netty JBossRemoting

by ron.sigal＠jboss.com

By the way, Remoting does use a home grown distributed testing framework called "jrunit", an extension of junit, and jrunit uses jgroups. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4243039#4243039 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4243039

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Remoting] - Re: Netty JBossRemoting

by ron.sigal＠jboss.com

"mattlf" wrote : | Is the multicast in the discovery mechanism going to work over different subnets | org.jboss.remoting.detection.multicast.MulticastDetector uses a java.net.MulticastSocket, and doesn't call MulticastSocket.setTTL() or MulticastSocket.setTimeToLive(), so it uses the default TTL value, which, I believe, is 1. So the multicast detector, in its current form, is restricted to its local network. "mattlf" wrote : | what is the reason for Remoting2 to use its own multicast mechanism? I read that JBoss cluster is based on JGroup. Do you think JGroup could provide value to JBoss Remoting with its multicast capability? | I wasn't present at the creation of the discovery subsystem, but I'm going to say 1. jgroups, which is very powerful, flexible software, could indeed offer a lot of functionality, but 2. it probably wasn't considered desirable to introduce a dependency on jgroups. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4243038#4243038 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4243038

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Remoting] - Re: binary protocol?

by ron.sigal＠jboss.com

You are quite correct, Trustin. I would add only that the http and servlet transports use http connections, so the serialized objects are encoded. But there's no XML. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4243037#4243037 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4243037

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Remoting] - Re: Performance slowdown on JBoss 4.2.3.GA

by ron.sigal＠jboss.com

Hi Vinay, Have you made any progress with this issue? Of course, if you're using the same version of Remoting in both cases, I feel fairly safe in assuming it's not a Remoting problem. Of course, you never know. When you say "rmi call", which particular subsystem are you talking about. EJB3, for example, or JBossMessaging? -Ron View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4243036#4243036 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4243036

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Remoting] - Re: Compatibility/Performance of Remoting 2.5.1

by ron.sigal＠jboss.com

Hi Vinay, The 2.5 releases represent minor evolutionary changes from the 2.4 releases, and I'm not aware of any incompatibilities, other than the fact that the coyote invoker (the server side of the Remoting http transport) in the 2.5 releases doesn't work with apache Tomcat, only JBossWeb. Also, I wouldn't expect much of a performance difference. If you discover any contradictions to my suppositions, please let me know. Thanks, Ron View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4243035#4243035 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4243035

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossWS] - Re: Streamlined tutorial on JBossWS w/ policies (WS-RM)?

by Oberiko

Still banging my head on this one. Could anyone let me know if the server code I have posted is valid? Is the @Policy annotation compatible with WS-RM? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4243034#4243034 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4243034

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Remoting] - Re: Download area empty

by ron.sigal＠jboss.com

Hi Tom, Clearly, the empty download page was a temporary glitch. In any case, for the record, you can go to the svn repository to get source code for any of the released jars. Each release is saved in http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbossremoting/remoting2/tags/ For example, to get the source for 2.5.1, go to http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbossremoting/remoting2/tags/2.5.1/src/main/ -Ron View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4243033#4243033 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4243033

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Remoting] - Re: Access to client SSL certificate in server invokation ha

by ron.sigal＠jboss.com

There's no built in way to do that. If you are using a pure Remoting client / server system, then you could send the certificate along with the invocation in the "metadata map" passed to the org.jboss.remoting.Client method | public Object invoke(Object param, Map metadata) throws Throwable; | If you're using a system like EJB3 where Remoting is running under the surface, it would be harder to do, though you could probably do something with a custom interceptor on the client side. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4243032#4243032 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4243032

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user July 2009