The problem is: I still don't understand the question.
You have some rules (in what format? What implementation? Drools? Or...?). And you want to call them in the jbpm process?
And this calling should be done via web service?
And why are you refereing to stored procedures? Maybe you have rules in a completly different format?
Would be good, if you give the domain example of what you are trying to achieve.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4252691#4252691
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4252691
Can we Customize jbpm Rules and Workflow through Web UI? If so how?
I hope that we can integrate Rules and Workflow. But any document or link provided for that with respect to jbpm?
How do we do versioning of rules?
does JBPM provide runtime compiling capability? if so any link ?
Guys i would appreciate if i get any reply for the above questions. Plz provide the link if u have any for the above questions
View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4252686#4252686
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4252686
I was using Native for server (EJB) and client (Java SE / jax-ws dipatch mainly) with encryptation but without signing.
Recently, I rewrote just the client with CXF using the same approach (dispatch), but an issue break me!
Without signing, WSS4J (used by CXF for encrypting) didn't set 'wsu:Id' for 'body' tag and Native reject the message (in class RequireTargetableOperation).
Commenting the test where Native require 'wsu:Id' in RequireTargetableOperation makes CXF encrypted message acceptable and correct.
Using signing makes WSS4J set 'wsu:Id' for 'body' tag, so no issues this way.
I don't know if this issue is a CXF (WSS4J) issue or a Native issue, but here seems to be the right place to report.
(CXF 2.2.3 and Native 3.0.5/JBoss 4.2.3 or Native 3.1.2/JBoss 5.1)
Thanks,
View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4252675#4252675
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4252675