I have already tried bumping up the timeouts to very high numbers and that doesnt help. There are no concurrent transactions that are accessing this same fqn. However, as described above, it is a nested (with a requires_new propagation) transaction.The external transaction is suspended when this happens in the internal transaction. This object/fqn is never accessed by the external transaction though. In fact the cache isnt even touched in the external transaction.
There is never a problem when the same operation is done in a single transaction (non-nested)
View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4250728#4250728
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4250728
"jaikiran" wrote : From what i remember, the module-order controls the order of modules in the application.xml and not the order of modules in jboss-app.xml.
I'm wrong. Just found the dtd which says this:
anonymous wrote :
| The strict value indicates that the deployments of the modules will be done in the order that would be specified in the application.xml and jboss-app.xml file .
Could you post your console logs (not server.log), the entire exception stacktrace and the contents of that jboss-service.xml?
View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4250724#4250724
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4250724
I have the same question. I'm trying to migrate some customers using Glassfish/BPEL to JBoss/jBPM. Having BPEL support in JBoss is important for the migration. In the long run we want to move everyone to BPMN so I want to start with jBPM v4 which is the first version to support BPMN. However, when I try deploying the BPEL ear to JBoss 5.1 (required by jbpm 4) I get this error: org.jboss.xb.binding.JBossXBRuntimeException: Element {http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee}application is not bound as a global element.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4250718#4250718
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4250718