September 2009 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[jBPM Users] - Re: Issue with remote client and JBPM 4.1

by kukeltje

Tomcat and ejb's? Hmm.... don't think that will work. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4253257#4253257 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4253257

15 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Users] - Re: [jBPM 4.1] not finding the GPD

by kukeltje

Well, yes and no. The Jira is the 'todo' list for the devs (heck for everybody in the community ;-)), the forum is not. And although it is not a big change. people are busy doing different things (JBossWorld e.g. or having a normal job) so it can be easily forgotten. So it's not bureaucracy imo. Regarding the fixing 'on the fly', that is also not as easy as you think. Might be that other changes are already in the docs, so those will be published then as well, and manually fixing the online doc is not easy as well because of release procedures (access do the files etc). What could be done is making a sticky topic in the forum for the timebeing. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4253256#4253256 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4253256

15 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Users] - Re: jbpm 4.0 creating and running processes without persiste

by kukeltje

Uhhhmm... it is even in the documentation: http://docs.jboss.com/jbpm/v4.0/userguide/html_single/#withvariables View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4253254#4253254 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4253254

15 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Users] - Re: jbpm 4.0 creating and running processes without persiste

by kukeltje

Look at the testcases of jBPM4 and the api. There is a method where you pass on variables while starting/creating the processinstance. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4253253#4253253 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4253253

15 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Users] - Re: Ability to build custom process steps

by kukeltje

Yes, this is possible, but jBPM does not have a webservice node in it's palet. You can easily generate the stubs with every ws framework you want to use and use that as a custom action. This might (will) change in the future though since jBPM is also working on a BPMN2 compliant engine and that requires calling ws by configuring the endpoint, incoming and outgoing message like in bpel. In fact, you could make a custom node in jBPM4 that does effectively this. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4253251#4253251 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4253251

15 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Tools Users] - Setting up JBoss Tools in Ganymede

by shashank.rudra

Hello to all I am using the link on this site http://www.jboss.org/tools/download to set Gaymede Eclipse3.4.2 with Jboss tools 3.0 When I am using the update URL given on this page i.e. http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable/ I am getting this error that "no update is available on this site" in the eclipse Software Updates screen. Has any one used this and any idea where the problem is? Also when you say you want to use Drool5 then do we need to get the jars for that separate or these installations come with the required dependencies? There are other posts of mine that is related to Galileo set up. But in that I faces too many problem even running a Default Drools project game me -"NO DONUT FOR YOU". So I am trying this out with Ganymede. Any help on this is greatly appreciated folks. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4253250#4253250 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4253250

15 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Users] - Re: jBPM admin privilege clarification

by kukeltje

Yes you are, but it might be that at the moment everybody can see them. Not sure if that is protected (yet) since the console is still under development and getting better and better each release. If it is not there now, it sure will be in the (not so distant) future. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4253249#4253249 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4253249

15 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Users] - Re: Same token seems to be attached to two task instances?

by kukeltje

Makes me wonder to. Is your transaction level 'correctly' configured (don't ask me what correctly is, I'm not a DB guy) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4253248#4253248 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4253248

15 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Users] - Re: Handling failure of automated activities

by kukeltje

1: Exception handling like in jBPM 3 is still on the todo list (look in Jira). For technical retries to external systems etc, I do not think jBPM should reinvent (reimplement) the wheel (like they are doing in drools with reinventing workflow) but leverage what is already there, JBoss ESB or JMS or your custom code/custom node. For business level retries, what you describe is an option. Might require a custom node though. 2: Yes (at least tin 4.1, afaik, in 4.0 there was a small issue, that error jobs could block the rest) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4253247#4253247 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4253247

15 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Beginner's Corner] - What configuration should we used - web, standard, default?

by vbez

We develop web application and we are going to deploy it on JBoss. Now we use JSF, Facelets, Webflow, JMX, Spring. We are going to use JMS(ActiveMQ). Maybe in the future we will use EJB3. But for near future we will not use it. What configuration would be better to use - web, standard, default? And why? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4253246#4253246 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4253246

15 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user September 2009