Dear Team,
Request: If this post is related to any other catagory of Jboss forum, please move it. Regret any inconvenience caused.
Is there any option [Jboss Tools] to generate followings through eclipse:
1. Generate only selective Seam Entity/Beans/Components from database. Instead of 'seam-gen'
2. Generate specific views [list/home/edit..etc] from seam Entity/components.
3. Create modules for seam projects (instead of projects in Eclipse workspace). With support for dev and prod environments as seam-gen console option.
Thank you in advance.
Details: Eclipse.3.4, Seam 2.1.2, Jboss Tool 3.x,RF.3.1.3
Reference: http://seamframework.org/Community/JBossToolsEclipse
View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4256640#4256640
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4256640
Hello,
yes, I'm doing that now for a limited number of keys (eagerly putting them in the cache instead of removing the whole node), although I'm doing it inside the TX (I want the new values to be calculated basing on the data modified in the TX), however I can't do that for all keys, as that would take too much time. The whole point of using a cache loader is to be able to compute those values lazily.
Adam
View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4256638#4256638
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4256638
anonymous wrote : Heh, I didn't expect that my use case will be so uncommon. It seems a relatively simple idea to store some computed values and invalidate them when the underlying data changes. But well ... :)
Well apparently this is the first time one asks for this functionality :)
One thing you can try: what about replace the cache.remove call, with a cache.put(newValue), and fetch the new value outside the transaction.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4256635#4256635
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4256635