January 2010 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[jBPM] New message: "Re: Multi-client/tenant capability"

by Heiko Tappe

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Multi-client/tenant capability": http://community.jboss.org/message/522909#522909 Author : Heiko Tappe Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/tdtappe Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- As I am new to jBPM this might be a silly question... but what about USER/GROUP stuff for instance? There will definitely be a user JOHN in company a and also in company b. And they are not related to each other in any way. And there might be other queries to the process engine that should only return results concerning the current company. --Heiko -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/522909#522909

14 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM] New message: "jBPM 4.3-jbpm.bpmn.cfg.xml does not exist"

by apurv agnihotri

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "jBPM 4.3-jbpm.bpmn.cfg.xml does not exist": http://community.jboss.org/message/522904#522904 Author : apurv agnihotri Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/apurv888 Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Hi All, While trying to run the examples provided in the latest jbpm4.3.zip(Using Netbeans IDE) there occurs an *error in importing "jbpm.bpmn.cfg.xml"* resource(*inside jbpm.cfg.xml*).I figured out that jbpm.bpmn.cfg.xml does not even exist in the provided zip. Is this is a real issue or I am mising out something? Thanks, Apurv -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/522904#522904

14 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM] New message: "Re: How to invoke applications in a task activity"

by Jiemin Zhang

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "How to invoke applications in a task activity": http://community.jboss.org/message/522903#522903 Author : Jiemin Zhang Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/Jiemin Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks a lot for your answer. I don't have my own GUI. If I would like to use JSF instead of task form, how can I add it to the task activiy? And which jBPM-API should I use? Thanks you -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/522903#522903

14 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM] New message: "Re: Creating tasks in a loop with JBPM 4.3"

by T T

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Creating tasks in a loop with JBPM 4.3": http://community.jboss.org/message/522901#522901 Author : T T Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/jbpm42user Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Any thoughts? -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/522901#522901

14 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Web Services] New message: "Re: JAX-WS and Digest Authentication"

by Ian Ian

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "JAX-WS and Digest Authentication": http://community.jboss.org/message/522899#522899 Author : Ian Ian Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/hirowla Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Any ideas? Or is this the wrong forum? If so, what do you suggest is the right forum? -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/522899#522899

14 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM] New message: "Re: Best way to extend Tasks in 4.3?"

by Ronald van Kuijk

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Best way to extend Tasks in 4.3?": http://community.jboss.org/message/522897#522897 Author : Ronald van Kuijk Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/kukeltje Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Nope, not for 4.4, this is al little longer term issue... The issue of task not closing is running fine locally here as you can read in the bug report. The only thing is that I 'abuse' passing a temporary process variable (one with a very specific kind of jBPM internal name and never accessible by the customer (it is deleted before that would be possible) Yet it still is a hack, so waiting for an answer by one of the core devs -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/522897#522897

14 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM] New message: "Re: Async continuation in decision activity"

by Ronald van Kuijk

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Async continuation in decision activity": http://community.jboss.org/message/522896#522896 Author : Ronald van Kuijk Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/kukeltje Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Ok, your test runs and is green here. There is no decisionhandler called as I would expect since you have no jobscheduler configured in your config. In that case you should run it 'manually' in the testcase. See the jBPM source (modules/test-db/.... ) for examples. And if I enable the jobscheduler in the config, it still is green... So advice: update to jbpm 4.3 -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/522896#522896

14 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Performance Tuning] New message: "Re: Call by value vs. call by reference"

by Arbi Sookazian

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Call by value vs. call by reference": http://community.jboss.org/message/522891#522891 Author : Arbi Sookazian Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/asookazian Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- There is a EJBDeployer MBean I see in the JMX console. The value for CallByValue is false. So I'm assuming all EJB calls for all apps are call-by-reference semantics? How do you configure call-by-reference on an app level (i.e. some apps call-by-value and some call-by-reference)? What is the approx. performance benefit of doing this (we're skipping the marshalling/unmarshalling now)? -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/522891#522891

14 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Performance Tuning] New message: "Call by value vs. call by reference"

by Arbi Sookazian

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Call by value vs. call by reference": http://community.jboss.org/message/522886#522886 Author : Arbi Sookazian Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/asookazian Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- h3. 1) Where is this configured (i.e. which Jboss xml file)? h3. 2) what is the default? *3) what is the recommendation for a clustered Seam/JSF/RichFaces application wrt this?* /*******************************************************************************************************************************************/ h3. Performance note - Call By Value The use of call by value and marshalling is very inefficient. It typically means method invocations take 10 times the cpu. Why? Compare Call By Value with Call By Reference h4. Call By Reference 1. caller does ejb.someMethod() 2. invocation is passed through ejb container 3. container does bean.someMethod() 4. result is returned to the caller h4. Call By Value 1. caller does ejb.someMethod() 2. invocation is marshalled - the parameters are turned into ObjectStream (a byte[]) 3. container with a different classloader unmarshalls - byte[] -> java Objects - including classloading 4. invocation is passed through ejb container 5. container does bean.someMethod() 6. result is marshalled - the return value is turned into ObjectStream 7. result is unmarshalled using the caller's classloader - byte[] -> java Object 8. result is return to the caller The marshalling and unmarshalling uses a lot of cpu. from: http://community.jboss.org/docs/DOC-9288 -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/522886#522886

14 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Microcontainer Development] New message: "Re: DependencyInfo remove items"

by Kabir Khan

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "DependencyInfo remove items": http://community.jboss.org/message/522882#522882 Author : Kabir Khan Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/kabir.khan@jboss.com Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Actually, maybe the issue with not being able to clear the DemandDependencyItems could be solved by making the dependsOnMe use a WeakHashMap? -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/522882#522882

14 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user January 2010