February 2010 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss Messaging] New message: "Redelivery Delay and Redelivery Times"

by null null

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Redelivery Delay and Redelivery Times": http://community.jboss.org/message/528543#528543 Author : null null Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/Paul_ADP Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- >From all of the documentation for JBM 1.4 (integrated into JBoss 5.1.0) it appears that for both: - MaxDeliveryAttempts - the number of times a message will be delivered to an MDB before being pushed to the DLQ - DeliveryDelay - the delay between subsequent redeliveries of the message to an MDB these values can ONLY be configured on a per destination basis (ie per Queue or Topic) and not per message. Is this true? I could swear the when I used JBoss MQ that you could set it in the message. Can someone please confirm? Thanks, --Paul -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/528543#528543

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM] New message: "Re: How to handle rollback due to runtime errors"

by Maciej Swiderski

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "How to handle rollback due to runtime errors": http://community.jboss.org/message/528542#528542 Author : Maciej Swiderski Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/swiderski.maciej Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Error events in BPMN 2.0 seems more like activity specific but I found something about boundary error events so that could be what I am looking for but as you mentioned there is not time frame for that to be implemented at the moment. Interceptors sounds quite nice, I must admit. Could you please provide some more details about it? Are they configurable or does it require to modify jBPM code? Thanks Maciej -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/528542#528542

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Beginner's Corner] New message: "Re: Get an error when trying overwrite war from eclipse"

by Wolfgang Knauf

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Get an error when trying overwrite war from eclipse": http://community.jboss.org/message/528540#528540 Author : Wolfgang Knauf Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/WolfgangKnauf Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Hi, I think you should better export the file to some temp location and the move it to the deploy folder ("move" is an atomic operation, which means that JBoss cannot interfere with it). Why a Flex/Java project and not a Eclipse/WTP "Dynamic Web Project"? If you use the latter, WTP will provide perform deployment for you. Hope this helps Wolfgang -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/528540#528540

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JNDI and Naming] New message: "Re: jndi.properties vs bindings-jboss-beans.xml"

by jsingh jsingh

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "jndi.properties vs bindings-jboss-beans.xml": http://community.jboss.org/message/528539#528539 Author : jsingh jsingh Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/jagdeep Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks Brian. So it looks to me that changes in bindings-jboss-beans.xml is the way to go. What I was trying to achieve by editing jndi.properties was to avoid having to define a JBoss specific context/url in my code base, and keep the code base common (to work for any other App Server), and have JBoss pick the required context, url from the jndi.properties. -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/528539#528539

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[EJB 3.0] New message: "Re: howto setup jpa using oracle 10g unicode nvarchar2"

by Wolfgang Knauf

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "howto setup jpa using oracle 10g unicode nvarchar2": http://community.jboss.org/message/528532#528532 Author : Wolfgang Knauf Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/WolfgangKnauf Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Hi, did you check the log output? Which "create table" statements are called? See here: http://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/core/3.3/reference/en/html/session-config... You probably have to switch the category "org.hibernate.tool.hbm2ddl" to "DEBUG" (which means that you have to switch the default appender from INFO to DEBUG). Hope this helps Wolfgang -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/528532#528532

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM] New message: "Re: jBPM 4.3 in Tomcat 6 as a webapplication"

by Johannes Huber

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "jBPM 4.3 in Tomcat 6 as a webapplication": http://community.jboss.org/message/528531#528531 Author : Johannes Huber Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/Huber Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Hello, I have a similiar problem on jboss (4.2.3 or 5.1.0.GA). I erased package javax.el.* from juel.jar and it worked for me, but I did not really test it out. Cheers Johannes -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/528531#528531

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Web Services] New message: "Re: Client says MTOM policy not supported"

by Martin Sarabura

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Client says MTOM policy not supported": http://community.jboss.org/message/528524#528524 Author : Martin Sarabura Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/steeqs4 Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- I see that org.jboss.ws.extensions.policy.deployer.PolicyDeployer has those four policies hard-coded in a static block - and not MTOM. So my question is, does this mean the client is simply unable to support MTOM? I'm using native JBossws 3.2.2. Is there another implementation that will support MTOM? -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/528524#528524

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Beginner's Corner] New message: "Re: How do I enable pass-by-reference for EJB3 in JBoss AS container?"

by Jerry Simone

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "How do I enable pass-by-reference for EJB3 in JBoss AS container?": http://community.jboss.org/message/528518#528518 Author : Jerry Simone Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/jlsimone Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Hmmm, I am so new to JBoss that I am not in the position to question the knowledge and experience of those who have been around and involved much longer than I. Never the less, I have a couple more questions. I am hoping against hope that I can get JBoss to do what WebSphere is doing for me. I read a post at this link http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=24905 that said, "JBoss automatically knows when you are accessing an EJB in the same container, even if you use Remote interfaces. Thus, it passes by reference instead of by value, offering the performance advantage of Local interfaces." Now, it is important to point out that this post was from April, 2004, a long time ago. Was this statement ever true, and if so, is it still true? In addition, somehow I found my way to the org.jboss.invocation.InvokerInterceptor class. This class strongly suggests that the quote from the post, above, may be true. I have been trying to figure out if or how or when this InvokerInterceptor might be used and how it might behave in my circumstances. Is the InvokerInterceptor ever used at all in JBoss? Does JBoss need to be configured in order to use it? -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/528518#528518

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Microcontainer Development] New message: "Re: VFS3 and symlinks"

by Ales Justin

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "VFS3 and symlinks": http://community.jboss.org/message/528517#528517 Author : Ales Justin Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/alesj Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- * https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBVFS-138 > The question is.... Do we want to support the notion that they are always the same? I don't think so. I think if you provide the canonical path at mount time, that is what is mounted. If you provide the path with a symlink, that is what is mounted. Otherwise we would have to force it to the canonical path every time, or create mount the same filesystem at multiple mount points. > Afais, the fix is simple, simply try to convert every path in VFS::getChild(String path) to canonical path. I would just put a flag, which would be false by default, if we should really do this for every invocation. I hacked this already. :-) But if there is a better way to do this, or if I missed some use case, feel free to fix it. -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/528517#528517

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Microcontainer Development] New message: "VFS3 and symlinks"

by Ales Justin

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "VFS3 and symlinks": http://community.jboss.org/message/528510#528510 Author : Ales Justin Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/alesj Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Me:> Symlinks also don't work with VFS3 -- see added SymlinkTestCase test. JohnB: > I think the problem here is how the mounting is happening. Your test is mounting the EARs/JARs using the canonical path. So they are showing up in the VFS with the full non-symlinked path. Then when you test the URL you are providing the path with a symlink. It won't work is this mixed style as they are separate paths in the VFS. If you mount the EAR given the symlinked path, the test works fine as the path is used in the VFS and you can then continue to use the symlinked path from then on. > > The question is.... Do we want to support the notion that they are always the same? I don't think so. I think if you provide the canonical path at mount time, that is what is mounted. If you provide the path with a symlink, that is what is mounted. Otherwise we would have to force it to the canonical path every time, or create mount the same filesystem at multiple mount points. > > Thoughts? -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/528510#528510

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user February 2010