March 2010 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[EJB 3.0] New message: "JPA tests failed on JBOSS EAP due to javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: ProxyFactory not bound"

by Kevin Yuan

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "JPA tests failed on JBOSS EAP due to javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: ProxyFactory not bound": http://community.jboss.org/message/531206#531206 Author : Kevin Yuan Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/kevin.yuan Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Hi, We have JPA tests, there is EJB3 sessionbean "TestRunner", during the testing, it will lookup the sessionbean and run tests from it. All tests worked with JBOSS Application Server 5.1.0 GA, but failed with JBOSS Enterprise Application Platform 5.0.0 GA during JNDI lookup for the sessionbean, the error message is: <error message="Could not dereference object" type="javax.naming.NamingException">javax.naming.NamingException: Could not dereference object [Root exception is java.lang.RuntimeException: Exception while trying to locate proxy factory in JNDI, at key ProxyFactory/eclipselink-advanced-field-access-model/TestRunner/TestRunner] at org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContext.getObjectInstanceWrapFailure(NamingContext.java:1504) at org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:822) at org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:686) at javax.naming.InitialContext.lookup(InitialContext.java:392) at org.eclipse.persistence.testing.framework.junit.JUnitTestCase.runBareClient(JUnitTestCase.java:480) at org.eclipse.persistence.testing.framework.junit.JUnitTestCase.runBare(JUnitTestCase.java:455) Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Exception while trying to locate proxy factory in JNDI, at key ProxyFactory/eclipselink-advanced-field-access-model/TestRunner/TestRunner at org.jboss.ejb3.proxy.impl.objectfactory.ProxyObjectFactory.getProxyFactoryFromJNDI(ProxyObjectFactory.java:235) at org.jboss.ejb3.proxy.impl.objectfactory.ProxyObjectFactory.getObjectInstance(ProxyObjectFactory.java:153) at javax.naming.spi.NamingManager.getObjectInstance(NamingManager.java:304) at org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContext.getObjectInstance(NamingContext.java:1479) at org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContext.getObjectInstanceWrapFailure(NamingContext.java:1496) Caused by: javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: ProxyFactory not bound at org.jnp.server.NamingServer.getBinding(NamingServer.java:771) at org.jnp.server.NamingServer.getBinding(NamingServer.java:779) at org.jnp.server.NamingServer.getObject(NamingServer.java:785) at org.jnp.server.NamingServer.lookup(NamingServer.java:396) at org.jnp.server.NamingServer.lookup(NamingServer.java:399) at sun.rmi.server.UnicastServerRef.dispatch(UnicastServerRef.java:305) at sun.rmi.transport.Transport$1.run(Transport.java:159) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at sun.rmi.transport.Transport.serviceCall(Transport.java:155) at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport.handleMessages(TCPTransport.java:535) at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$ConnectionHandler.run0(TCPTransport.java:790) at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$ConnectionHandler.run(TCPTransport.java:649) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) at sun.rmi.transport.StreamRemoteCall.exceptionReceivedFromServer(StreamRemoteCall.java:255) at sun.rmi.transport.StreamRemoteCall.executeCall(StreamRemoteCall.java:233) at sun.rmi.server.UnicastRef.invoke(UnicastRef.java:142) at org.jnp.server.NamingServer_Stub.lookup(Unknown Source) at org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:726) at org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:686) at org.jboss.ejb3.proxy.impl.objectfactory.ProxyObjectFactory.getProxyFactoryFromJNDI(ProxyObjectFactory.java:226) So I am wondering if I need to do any special thing for JBOSS EAP version? I also tried to add META-INF/jboss.xml to specify <invoker-proxy-bindings>, but that doesn't help too, my jboss.xml is like: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE jboss PUBLIC "-//JBoss//DTD JBOSS 3.2//EN" "http://www.jboss.org/j2ee/dtd/jboss_3_2.dtd"> <jboss> <enterprise-beans> <session> <ejb-name>TestRunner</ejb-name> <jndi-name>TestRunner</jndi-name> <invoker-bindings> <invoker> <invoker-proxy-binding-name> stateless-http-invoker </invoker-proxy-binding-name> </invoker> </invoker-bindings> </session> </enterprise-beans> <invoker-proxy-bindings>  <invoker-proxy-binding> <name>stateless-http-invoker</name> <invoker-mbean>jboss:service=invoker,type=http</invoker-mbean> <proxy-factory>org.jboss.proxy.ejb.ProxyFactory</proxy-factory> <proxy-factory-config> <client-interceptors> <home> <interceptor>org.jboss.proxy.ejb.HomeInterceptor</interceptor> <interceptor>org.jboss.proxy.SecurityInterceptor</interceptor> <interceptor>org.jboss.proxy.TransactionInterceptor</interceptor> <interceptor>org.jboss.invocation.InvokerInterceptor</interceptor> </home> <bean> <interceptor> org.jboss.proxy.ejb.StatelessSessionInterceptor </interceptor> <interceptor>org.jboss.proxy.SecurityInterceptor</interceptor> <interceptor>org.jboss.proxy.TransactionInterceptor</interceptor> <interceptor>org.jboss.invocation.InvokerInterceptor</interceptor> </bean> </client-interceptors> </proxy-factory-config> </invoker-proxy-binding> </invoker-proxy-bindings> </jboss> -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/531206#531206

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Development] New message: "Re: jBPM 4.4 trunk build failure"

by Ronald van Kuijk

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "jBPM 4.4 trunk build failure": http://community.jboss.org/message/531203#531203 Author : Ronald van Kuijk Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/kukeltje Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- done -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/531203#531203

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM] New message: "Re: which is better drools' rule flow or jbpm"

by Ronald van Kuijk

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "which is better drools' rule flow or jbpm": http://community.jboss.org/message/531196#531196 Author : Ronald van Kuijk Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/kukeltje Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- I agree with Maurico that each has it's advantages. I also agree that a large percentage has something like event processing. How large the percentage is that needs complex event processing (emphasis on complex) is debatable. A good article about process centric vs information centric is http://www.theenterprisearchitect.eu/archive/2010/01/13/the-process-centr.... -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/531196#531196

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Messaging] New message: "Problem in consume priority mensage with jboss message"

by Leo Souza

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Problem in consume priority mensage with jboss message": http://community.jboss.org/message/531194#531194 Author : Leo Souza Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/leosouzabh Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- where the message "Prioridade 5" should not be second, should be third, why this is happen ? PS: All messages are send after the first message process. Media Description: Link: http://www.gstatic.com/translate/sound_player.swf -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/531194#531194

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM] New message: "Re: Possible performance problem caused by autoSaveProcessInstances"

by Ronald van Kuijk

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Possible performance problem caused by autoSaveProcessInstances": http://community.jboss.org/message/531193#531193 Author : Ronald van Kuijk Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/kukeltje Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Personally I would look first in how it is possible you page adds thousands of the same process instances to the list. We've never heard anyone else having a problem with this. -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/531193#531193

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM] New message: "Re: Generate Image from ProcessDefinition"

by Ronald van Kuijk

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Generate Image from ProcessDefinition": http://community.jboss.org/message/531191#531191 Author : Ronald van Kuijk Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/kukeltje Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- As I said before, there is no solution, other then implementing something yourself -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/531191#531191

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM] New message: "Re: How to integrate a jBPM engine on JBoss 5.0.1 AS"

by Ronald van Kuijk

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "How to integrate a jBPM engine on JBoss 5.0.1 AS": http://community.jboss.org/message/531190#531190 Author : Ronald van Kuijk Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/kukeltje Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Or JBoss ESB -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/531190#531190

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM] New message: "Re: Receive an email starts execution of one process"

by Ronald van Kuijk

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Receive an email starts execution of one process": http://community.jboss.org/message/531189#531189 Author : Ronald van Kuijk Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/kukeltje Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- > Is possible? Yes > how can i implement this? Like you would in any other situation where receiving an email should trigger something. E.g. a Mail driven MDB, an ESB or whatever. jBPM does not provide anything for this out of the box Cheers, Ronald -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/531189#531189

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM] New message: "Re: which is better drools' rule flow or jbpm"

by Mauricio Salatino

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "which is better drools' rule flow or jbpm": http://community.jboss.org/message/531180#531180 Author : Mauricio Salatino Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/salaboy21 Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Hi, It basically depends on your requirements, if you want a process centric framework, or if you want a deep integration with a rules engine plus complex event processing capabilities (90% of the time complex scenarios need these features). That's my two cents opinion. -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/531180#531180

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Microcontainer Development] New message: "Re: JBREFLECT-5 - Implementing generics in JavassistClassInfo"

by Kabir Khan

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "JBREFLECT-5 - Implementing generics in JavassistClassInfo": http://community.jboss.org/message/531177#531177 Author : Kabir Khan Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/kabir.khan@jboss.com Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- > mailto:kabir.khan@jboss.com wrote: > > 2) Wildcards and bounds are not tested, but I am not sure if we should support those or not? > Note to self: When I get round to this, I should check both interface and class bounds -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/531177#531177

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user March 2010