[jBPM] New message: "running decision node(jbpm 4.0) multiple times for single processInstance"
by praneet nandan
User development,
A new message was posted in the thread "running decision node(jbpm 4.0) multiple times for single processInstance":
http://community.jboss.org/message/529256#529256
Author : praneet nandan
Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/praneet
Message:
--------------------------------------------------------------
hey everyone,
is it possible to run decision node multiple times for single processinstance.
my usecase is like this there is a form which contains list of multiple student. i have to mark whether student is selected or not
using combo box which contains value {Selected, Rejected} .the above work i have placed in task node. now after completing task(form is submitted)
there is decision node which check whether student is selected or not if selected it will go to the mail node and all the selected student will receive
the mail.and finally process go to end state.
so how to move decision node multiple time for single processInstance so that all selected student receive the mail in single instance of process,becoz if first student got selected decision node will execute ,it goes to mail node and finally it will go to end state and that instance of process will terminate.
--------------------------------------------------------------
To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/529256#529256
16 years, 1 month
[JCA Development] New message: "Re: Standalone JCA: JNDI binding for multiple connection factories..."
by Jesper Pedersen
User development,
A new message was posted in the thread "Standalone JCA: JNDI binding for multiple connection factories...":
http://community.jboss.org/message/529252#529252
Author : Jesper Pedersen
Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/jesper.pedersen
Message:
--------------------------------------------------------------
I see 3 ways of defining the JNDI name for CFs and AOs:
1. Container: The container defines the name - user-friendly - based on the strategy used
2. Static: JNDI binding names are defined in metadata - f.ex. jboss-ra.xml
3. "Dynamic": JNDI binding names are defined external to the resource adapter - f.ex. in a -ds.xml file
We have to define an interface for the JNDI binding strategy for the container part - as we will most likely use different strategies based on the environment we are running in - standalone, embedded and inside AS.
The best solution would be to have a "static" unique JNDI name defined for each connection factory and admin object - which the strategy then just links to.
But lets start with the most common case, and most user-friendly: container defined, and only one connection factory and one admin object. Then we can go from there.
--------------------------------------------------------------
To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/529252#529252
16 years, 1 month
[JBoss Portal Development] New message: "Why is JB Portal gone? Is GateIn Portal really the replacement?"
by Dave Godbey
User development,
A new message was posted in the thread "Why is JB Portal gone? Is GateIn Portal really the replacement?":
http://community.jboss.org/message/529236#529236
Author : Dave Godbey
Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/dgodbey
Message:
--------------------------------------------------------------
Not too long ago my group evaluated a number of open source portal products for a customer. We evaluated JBP, Liferay, and Exo. We didn't like Exo much, and we spent most of our time with Liferay and JBP.
While Liferay was slick looking and did many of the things our customer wanted, it did not do EVERYTHING our customer wanted. Since the customer wanted everything that they wanted, we chose JBP for ease of customization and integration with other products.
No sooner did we get out of the gate (pun intended) customizing JBP for the customer, we learned that 2.7.2 was the end of the road for JBoss Portal, and that GateIn products were the future for JBoss portal products.
Unfortunately, in our view, GateIn Portal comes up short compared to Liferay (it is the same kind of product, shiny and self-contained). But then there is the Portlet Container.
Our interest is in the portal toolkit, as JBP appears to be. Perhaps the GateIn Portlet Container product will fit the bill, but it is not nearly as functional as JBP was, and it looks as though the activity is with GateIn Portal right now.
What happened? Are there discussions or threads where I might catch up with the JBP history and its giving way to GateIn?
Dave
PS I also posted on the testimonial/discussion board, but the activity there seems to be negligible, so I posted here
--------------------------------------------------------------
To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/529236#529236
16 years, 1 month
[Testimonials] New message: "Why is JB Portal gone? Is GateIn Portal really the replacement?"
by Dave Godbey
User development,
A new message was posted in the thread "Why is JB Portal gone? Is GateIn Portal really the replacement?":
http://community.jboss.org/message/529235#529235
Author : Dave Godbey
Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/dgodbey
Message:
--------------------------------------------------------------
Not too long ago my group evaluated a number of open source portal products for a customer. We evaluated JBP, Liferay, and Exo. We didn't like Exo much, and we spent most of our time with Liferay and JBP.
While Liferay was slick looking and did many of the things our customer wanted, it did not do EVERYTHING our customer wanted. Since the customer wanted everything that they wanted, we chose JBP for ease of customization and integration with other products.
No sooner did we get out of the gate (pun intended) customizing JBP for the customer, we learned that 2.7.2 was the end of the road for JBoss Portal, and that GateIn products were the future for JBoss portal products.
Unfortunately, in our view, GateIn Portal comes up short compared to Liferay (it is the same kind of product, shiny and self-contained). But then there is the Portlet Container?
Our interest is in the portal toolkit, as JBP appears to be. Perhaps the GateIn Portlet Container product will fit the bill, but it is not nearly as functional as JBP was, and it looks as though the activity is with GateIn Portal right now.
What happened? Are there discussions or threads where I might catch up with the JBP history and its giving way to GateIn?
Dave
--------------------------------------------------------------
To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/529235#529235
16 years, 1 month