March 2010 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

Re: [jboss-user] [Beginner's Corner] - Starting Jboss from Eclipse

by Mark Wareham

Mark Wareham [http://community.jboss.org/people/markaw1] replied to the discussion "Starting Jboss from Eclipse" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/533049#533049 -------------------------------------------------------------- A) jboss-5.1.0.GA B) 1.6 and 1.5. ah. java -version shows 1.6 -i'll take a look at that after the weekend, thats probably the problem. Will let you know C) echo $JAVA_HOME /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-4.4 D) window>preferences>java>installed JREs> = 1.6 and 1.5 - 1.5 is ticked. window>preferences>java>compiler> = 1.5 Thanks for the help -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/533049#533049] Start a new discussion in Beginner's Corner at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [jboss-user] [JCA] - How to define a read-only connection ?

by Adrian Brock

Adrian Brock [http://community.jboss.org/people/adrian%40jboss.org] replied to the discussion "How to define a read-only connection ?" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/533048#533048 -------------------------------------------------------------- > Roberto Mazzola wrote: > > I try it but it doesn't works. > > I change my DS to > > <connection-property name="readOnly" type="java.lang.Boolean">true</connection-property> > > > It reply always "false". > > I try different way.. also using java standalone class but the only way is to invoke directly the setReadOnly method on the connection > > I opened also a post of IBM DB2 Forum.... > > I hope to find a solution... > > ty Actually that won't work. I checked the dtd and there is no type="" attribute for ConnectionPropertys in -ds.xml, only for ConfigPropertys in ra.xml You might want to raise a feature request for it in JIRA? If you can make your datasource XA, then you will be able to use <xa-datasource-property name="readOnly">true</xa-datasource-property> and it will work out the type from the setReadOnly(boolean) method. For local datasources we don't know the types since we use java.sql.Driver.connect(String, Properties); and like I said above, there is no way to specify it. -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/533048#533048] Start a new discussion in JCA at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [jboss-user] [JCA] - How to define a read-only connection ?

by Roberto Mazzola

Roberto Mazzola [http://community.jboss.org/people/rmazzola] replied to the discussion "How to define a read-only connection ?" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/533045#533045 -------------------------------------------------------------- I try it but it doesn't works. I change my DS to <connection-property name="readOnly" type="java.lang.Boolean">true</connection-property> It reply always "false". I try different way.. also using java standalone class but the only way is to invoke directly the setReadOnly method on the connection I opened also a post of IBM DB2 Forum.... I hope to find a solution... ty -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/533045#533045] Start a new discussion in JCA at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Portal] - PortletFilter: how to redirect in a Error Portlet

by Raffaele Shmith

Raffaele Shmith [http://community.jboss.org/people/marcelloBoss] created the discussion "PortletFilter: how to redirect in a Error Portlet" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/533042#533042 -------------------------------------------------------------- Hello, I'm using PortletFilter to incercept some PortletRequests and verify authorization. If the user isn't authorized i want redirect to an Errore (public) Portlet. my code now is this: public class AuthFilter implements RenderFilter, ActionFilter { private FilterConfig filterConfig = null; public void init(FilterConfig filterConfig) throws PortletException { this.filterConfig = filterConfig; } public void doFilter(RenderRequest req, RenderResponse resp, FilterChain filterChain) throws IOException, PortletException { if (filterConfig == null) return; boolean auth=AuthManager.auth(req, resp); //check if the user is authotized if(!auth) { ??? //redirect to another portlet } filterChain.doFilter(req, resp); } I hope that you can help me Thanks RM -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/533042#533042] Start a new discussion in JBoss Portal at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [jboss-user] [JCA] - JCA / JNDI / ActiveMQ

by Adrian Brock

Adrian Brock [http://community.jboss.org/people/adrian%40jboss.org] replied to the discussion "JCA / JNDI / ActiveMQ" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/533041#533041 -------------------------------------------------------------- > Alexander Petitjean wrote: > > I am confused - because JBoss Messaging is (as far as i know) also embedded via JCA and also bound to global JNDI and - I can successfully lookup the JBoss Messaging ConnectionFactory from a client outside !!! Why does it work - is this bug a feature ? ;-) > > Thx so far ! > > This is an FAQ. The JCA ConnectionFactorys are pools for local use bound in the java:/ namespace which is not accesible remotely. JBoss Messaging provides a different ConnectionFactory for remote client usage. For what ActiveMQ provides, you'll need to ask them. Whatever it is, it needs to be bound in the global namespace, not java:/ -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/533041#533041] Start a new discussion in JCA at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [jboss-user] [JCA] - How to define a read-only connection ?

by Adrian Brock

Adrian Brock [http://community.jboss.org/people/adrian%40jboss.org] replied to the discussion "How to define a read-only connection ?" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/533038#533038 -------------------------------------------------------------- > Roberto Mazzola wrote: > > <connection-property name="readOnly">true</connection-property> You're missing the xml attribute type="java.lang.Boolean". See http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/db2luw/v8/index.jsp?topic=/com.i... http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/db2luw/v8/index.jsp?topic=/com.i... It will be a java.lang.String by default which it probably doesn't recognise? -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/533038#533038] Start a new discussion in JCA at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [jboss-user] [JCA] - HornetQ RA integration

by Adrian Brock

Adrian Brock [http://community.jboss.org/people/adrian%40jboss.org] replied to the discussion "HornetQ RA integration" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/533034#533034 -------------------------------------------------------------- > Tim Fox wrote: > If that's not correct, I find it odd. However our impl should work in either case now, since Jeff has created a proxy around the real XAResource which switches between a non transacted and an XA session behind the scenes depending on whether the resource has been enlisted or not. I guess we could implement that for you with a slight tweak to the TxConnectionManager. i.e. if you configure <no-tx-seperate-pools/> - an old workaround for Oracle on the tx-connection-factory we use the LocalXAResource rather than invoking getXAResource() when the request is outside a JTA transaction at initial construction of the ManagedConnection, regardless of whether it says <xa-transaction/> That way you'll have two seperate pools for the different types of requests. In one pool getXAResource() will have been invoked, in the other it won't. Of course, other JCA implementations probably don't have that feature, so you'll still have problems with them. ;-) -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/533034#533034] Start a new discussion in JCA at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [jboss-user] [JCA] - HornetQ RA integration

by Adrian Brock

Adrian Brock [http://community.jboss.org/people/adrian%40jboss.org] replied to the discussion "HornetQ RA integration" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/533031#533031 -------------------------------------------------------------- > Tim Fox wrote: > > Adrian, > > So you're saying it's correct for a JCA impl to call > > getManagedConnection() > > then > > managedConnection.getXAResource() > > and then never enlist the resource in a tx, and expect the managed connection to behave as non transacted? > > I can't see this requirement in the JCA spec anyway, but I will defer to your better knowledge of JCA. Why do you think that is a correct assumption? The managed connections are pooled, so you've got no idea whether the connection is enlisted from one check out of the connection from the pool to the next unless you track it yourself in the ManagedConnection/XAResource calls. All your assumption does (including your wrapper workaround) is defer the failure to the case when for the same ManagedConnection it does: Request1: Is in a tx so use an XAConnection Request2: Not in a tx - oops still tries to use an XAConnection for non xa stuff. That is unless you back the ManagedConnection with two real connections/sessions? Anyway, although not exactly on topic, I remember arguing about this line in the JCA 1.6 spec review See 7.10.1 Transaction Scenarios Requirements " Note that both LocalTransaction and XATransaction resource adapters support local transactions. and they are both referred to as “local transaction capable” resource adapters in the section below. " We came to conclusion that this statement (from an older version of the spec) says that you can deploy a rar declared as XATransaction in local-tx mode at the connection factory level. But it could also be taken to require the behaviour we are discussing? -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/533031#533031] Start a new discussion in JCA at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Web Services Development] - Multiple Java interfaces exposed in a single WSDL interface

by Sameer Pokarna

Sameer Pokarna [http://community.jboss.org/people/sameerpokarna2] created the discussion "Multiple Java interfaces exposed in a single WSDL interface" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/533029#533029 -------------------------------------------------------------- Hi All, I am using JBoss 5.1.0 for my application development. I have a Java interfaces, sample.interfaces.interface1, and sample.interfaces.interface2. Each of these interfaces have a single method each. Each of these interfaces also have their own service implementation classes. I want to expose a single WSDL interface which will contain both these operations. When I tried this in JBoss, I encountered an issue, where only one of the <port-component> in webservices.xml was being recognised. But, I get an "Endpoint already registered" message. Any ideas on what is the best approach to achieve this? Thanks and regards, Sameer -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/533029#533029] Start a new discussion in JBoss Web Services Development at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [jboss-user] [JCA] - HornetQ RA integration

by Tim Fox

Tim Fox [http://community.jboss.org/people/timfox] replied to the discussion "HornetQ RA integration" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/533024#533024 -------------------------------------------------------------- Adrian, So you're saying it's correct for a JCA impl to call getManagedConnection() then managedConnection.getXAResource() and then never enlist the resource in a tx, and expect the managed connection to behave as non transacted? I can't see this requirement in the JCA spec anyway, but I will defer to your better knowledge of JCA. Our assumption has been, if the AS calls getXAResource() it's reasonable to expect it has done so because it's going to enlist that resource in a tx. If that's not correct, I find it odd. However our impl should work in either case now, since Jeff has created a proxy around the real XAResource which switches between a non transacted and an XA session behind the scenes depending on whether the resource has been enlisted or not. -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/533024#533024] Start a new discussion in JCA at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user March 2010