May 2010 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

Re: [jboss-user] [jBPM] - Getting the last actor of the completed task

by Al Nadein

Al Nadein [http://community.jboss.org/people/matrixpooh] replied to the discussion "Getting the last actor of the completed task" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/541195#541195 -------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks Maceij, I went with a work-around: I made transitions to the tasks match tasks names: if a task is called 'task-1', then transition is 'to-task-1'. Holding the pattern, i can do: processEngine.getHistoryService().createHistoryTaskQuery().executionId(executionId+".to-"+activityName).state(Task.STATE_COMPLETED).uniqueResult(); where activityName is 'task-1' Thanks again for help! -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/541195#541195] Start a new discussion in jBPM at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM] - jBPM- Transaction isolation level

by Alexander Sem

Alexander Sem [http://community.jboss.org/people/as_777us] created the discussion "jBPM- Transaction isolation level" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/541175#541175 -------------------------------------------------------------- Dear Experts, I use jBPM schema database with custom scheme/table database. Custom aplicatin do queries to jBPM scheme. What is best/optimum transaction isolation level for jBPM datasource or have to be equal to custom aplication datasource? Thanks -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/541175#541175] Start a new discussion in jBPM at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [jboss-user] [jBPM Development] - JBPM-2537

by Maciej Swiderski

Maciej Swiderski [http://community.jboss.org/people/swiderski.maciej] replied to the discussion "JBPM-2537" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/541171#541171 -------------------------------------------------------------- Hi, patch uploaded to jira, please review it and let me know your comments. If it comes to committing I think Alejandro needs to approve it since it is a change of the API. So let's hope he can find some time to look into it as well. Cheers, Maciej -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/541171#541171] Start a new discussion in jBPM Development at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [jboss-user] [jBPM Development] - Insert user information for process instance

by Michael Wohlfart

Michael Wohlfart [http://community.jboss.org/people/mwohlf] replied to the discussion "Insert user information for process instance" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/541141#541141 -------------------------------------------------------------- Hi HuiSheng, > [...] The most easiest way to store the start of a process is extending the JBPM4_EXECUTION, we could add a starter column, or something like this. > [...] > I read the related forum posts and the JIRA about this, maybe i still miss the point here, but extending the JBPM4_EXECUTION table for this seems wrong to me. A much better approach imho would be to keep that information in a swimlane like it is done in JBPM3 ( see: http://docs.jboss.org/jbpm/v3/userguide/taskmanagement.html http://docs.jboss.org/jbpm/v3/userguide/taskmanagement.html section 11.7) ...and thanks for your great work on jBPM4 -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/541141#541141] Start a new discussion in jBPM Development at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [jboss-user] [jBPM] - Getting the last actor of the completed task

by Maciej Swiderski

Maciej Swiderski [http://community.jboss.org/people/swiderski.maciej] replied to the discussion "Getting the last actor of the completed task" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/541136#541136 -------------------------------------------------------------- Hi, sorry, I gave you wrong examples. It should be: List<HistoryTask> history = historyService.createHistoryTaskQuery().executionId(processInstance.getId()).list(); Unfortunately there is no way to narrow down the search by activity name but you can either use task id or outcome. In the worst case you will get all completed task for execution and the filter it manually. Cheers, Maciej -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/541136#541136] Start a new discussion in jBPM at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [jboss-user] [jBPM] - Getting the last actor of the completed task

by Maciej Swiderski

Maciej Swiderski [http://community.jboss.org/people/swiderski.maciej] replied to the discussion "Getting the last actor of the completed task" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/541133#541133 -------------------------------------------------------------- Hi, in general you can do it using TaskService and TaskQuery, as follows: List<Task> tasks = taskService.createTaskQuery(). processInstanceId(processInstance.getId()).activityName("activityName").list(); You can use as well orderByDesc or Asc to sort the result. HTH Maciej -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/541133#541133] Start a new discussion in jBPM at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [jboss-user] [jBPM] - JBPM 4.3 - signalled state remains active - bug or incorrect usage?

by Jan Nad

Jan Nad [http://community.jboss.org/people/jnad] replied to the discussion "JBPM 4.3 - signalled state remains active - bug or incorrect usage?" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/541126#541126 -------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you - that was really fast. I'll try out the 4.4 snapshot. -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/541126#541126] Start a new discussion in jBPM at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [jboss-user] [jBPM] - JBPM 4.3 - signalled state remains active - bug or incorrect usage?

by Maciej Swiderski

Maciej Swiderski [http://community.jboss.org/people/swiderski.maciej] replied to the discussion "JBPM 4.3 - signalled state remains active - bug or incorrect usage?" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/541123#541123 -------------------------------------------------------------- Hi, yes, it is probably cause by a bug when using nasted fork-join. It has been fixed and it is going to be release with 4.4. You can get it now from trunk. I have ran your process and the result is correct: [A, B] [A] [D1, C1] [C2, D1] [D1] [D2] [E] Cheers, Maciej -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/541123#541123] Start a new discussion in jBPM at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM] - JBPM 4.3 - signalled state remains active - bug or incorrect usage?

by Jan Nad

Jan Nad [http://community.jboss.org/people/jnad] created the discussion "JBPM 4.3 - signalled state remains active - bug or incorrect usage?" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/541111#541111 -------------------------------------------------------------- The same problem seems to be described here http://www.techienuggets.com/Comments?tx=100474 http://www.techienuggets.com/Comments?tx=100474. I've not found any other references to it (or solutions). I have the following process definition: http://community.jboss.org/servlet/JiveServlet/showImage/2675/TestProcess... http://community.jboss.org/servlet/JiveServlet/downloadImage/2675/450-283... When I signal execution in D1, D2 becomes active (as reported by findActiveActivityNames), the problem is that D1 remains active as well. Is this a bug or did I get somethig wrong? It's been suggested this might be caused by wrong fork-join nesting but this doesn't help in my case. <process name="TestProcess" xmlns="http://jbpm.org/4.3/jpdl"> <start name="start1"> <transition to="fork1"/> </start> <state name="A"> <transition to="fork2"/> </state> <state name="C1"> <transition to="C2"/> </state> <state name="C2"> <transition to="join2"/> </state> <state name="D1"> <transition to="D2"/> </state> <state name="D2"> <transition to="join2"/> </state> <fork name="fork2"> <transition to="D1"/> <transition to="C1"/> </fork> <end name="finihed"/> <fork name="fork1"> <transition to="A"/> <transition to="B"/> </fork> <state name="B"> <transition to="join1"/> </state> <join name="join2""> <transition to="join1"/> </join> <join name="join1"> <transition to="E"/> </join> <state name="E"> <transition to="end"/> </state> <end name="end"/> </process> public void test() { repositoryService.createDeployment() .addResourceFromClasspath("pmlprocesses/TestProcess.jpdl.xml") .deploy(); * ProcessInstance processInstance = executionService.startProcessInstanceByKey("TestProcess"); String pid = processInstance.getId();* System.out.println(processInstance.findActiveActivityNames().toString());* String executionId = processInstance.findActiveExecutionIn("B").getId(); processInstance = executionService.signalExecutionById(executionId);* System.out.println(processInstance.findActiveActivityNames().toString()); * executionId = processInstance.findActiveExecutionIn("A").getId(); processInstance = executionService.signalExecutionById(executionId);* System.out.println(processInstance.findActiveActivityNames().toString());* executionId = processInstance.findActiveExecutionIn("C1").getId(); processInstance = executionService.signalExecutionById(executionId);* System.out.println(processInstance.findActiveActivityNames().toString()); * executionId = processInstance.findActiveExecutionIn("C2").getId(); processInstance = executionService.signalExecutionById(executionId);* System.out.println(processInstance.findActiveActivityNames().toString()); * executionId = processInstance.findActiveExecutionIn("D1").getId(); processInstance = executionService.signalExecutionById(executionId);* System.out.println(processInstance.findActiveActivityNames().toString()); * executionId = processInstance.findActiveExecutionIn("D2").getId(); processInstance = executionService.signalExecutionById(executionId);* System.out.println(processInstance.findActiveActivityNames().toString());* executionId = processInstance.findActiveExecutionIn("E").getId(); processInstance = executionService.signalExecutionById(executionId);* * assertNull("execution "+pid+" should not exist", executionService.findExecutionById(pid));* } Output: *[A, B] [A] [C1, D1] [C2, D1] [D1] [D2, D1] [E, D1]* The process seems to have finished execution. Thanks for any ideas. -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/541111#541111] Start a new discussion in jBPM at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [jboss-user] [jBPM Development] - JBPM-2537

by Sebastian Schneider

Sebastian Schneider [http://community.jboss.org/people/sebastian.s] replied to the discussion "JBPM-2537" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/541109#541109 -------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Huisheng Xu! I should have noticed that you've been talking about the outdated version of the patch. So nevermind. The great news are that we can go ahead and apply patchs having a solution for both issues. Sebastian -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/541109#541109] Start a new discussion in jBPM Development at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&cont...]

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user May 2010