[jboss-user] [IronJacamar] - Re: Is this the right project for a simple socket usecase?

Jesper Pedersen [https://community.jboss.org/people/jesper.pedersen] created the discussion "Re: Is this the right project for a simple socket usecase?" To view the discussion, visit: https://community.jboss.org/message/821229#821229 -------------------------------------------------------------- JCA is correct for your use-case. See http://www.ironjacamar.org/doc/userguide/1.1/en-US/html/ch01.html#overview http://www.ironjacamar.org/doc/userguide/1.1/en-US/html/ch01.html#overview for an overview of the architecture. In your case the Socket will be in the ManagedConnection. You can checkout our HelloWorld example at http://www.ironjacamar.org/doc/userguide/1.1/en-US/html/apb.html#sample_h... http://www.ironjacamar.org/doc/userguide/1.1/en-US/html/apb.html#sample_h... or in the IronJacamar distribution. And yes, if you need a Thread you will use the WorkManager with your Work implementation. If you are doing inbound then you will need a MessageEndpoint/MessageEndpointFactory that supports your listener. I would suggest supporting the JMS listener such that you can use the EJB3/MDB container as the MessageEndpoint/MessageEndpointFactory. You could do your own of course. There is an inflow example here: https://github.com/ironjacamar/ironjacamar/blob/master/core/src/test/java... https://github.com/ironjacamar/ironjacamar/blob/master/core/src/test/java... Likely you are looking for something more simple though. I'm not saying that JCA is the only solution to the problem - you could likely hack something together with Netty - but from a pure EE perspective I would say JCA is the way forward. -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [https://community.jboss.org/message/821229#821229] Start a new discussion in IronJacamar at Community [https://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&...]