anonymous wrote : anonymous wrote :
| | But there is another effect I don't understand : "myRole" got read
access to "/MyTopDirectory/TheUsableDirectory" and not to other directories
where it has not been granted write access. Specifying 'write' access to
'/TheUsableDirectory' should recurse to other directories under
'/TheUsableDirectory', and since write implies read, you should have
'read' access there. *Except ofcouse if you specifically specify permissions on
nodes under this, which override the recursing permissions*
| Are you overriding the recursing permissions the nodes?
OK, I understand why "myRole" get read access to '/TheUsableDirectory'
(hence we should have write access), but I don't understand why it has not read access
on '/TheUsableDirectory2' since it has read access to "/".
I am not overriding more than what I describe.
anonymous wrote : Reason I ask is if you grant read access to 'MyTopDirectory"
but no access to '/', then you will not get access to 'MyTopDirectory' for
obvious security reasons. Permissions only recurse down the tree, not up the tree.
|
OK I have to grant read access to "/".
anonymous wrote : for myRole2 who needs write access to /MyUsableDirectort2 but only read
access to /MyUsableDirectory, then for permissions on /MyUsableDirectory make sure you
grant this role atleast *read access*
In fact I don't want to grant "myRole2" with read access to
/MyUsableDirectory.
But when "overriding the recursing permissions" happens ? As soon as you make
one change for a given role in whatever directory ? That would explain why the read access
is no more available to '/TheUsableDirectory2'....
Thanks and Merry christmas you too. I am on holidays now until 02/01/2008.
Happy to read you next year !
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4115112#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...