"ASavitsky" wrote : My main concern with your approach is that the whole @In semantics gets lost from the parent class, even though it clearly belongs there. I'm not convinced of this, can you tell me why? anonymous wrote : | | @Override ( | | property = "foo", | | overrides = { | | @In ("specificFoo") | | }) | | public class Child { | | } I think this complicates the component and the syntax far more than any benefit it gives. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4040703#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...