Oops! Let's try that again... "gavin.king(a)jboss.com" wrote : anonymous wrote : is support for the WTP planned? | | This is a subject of debate between myself and Max. I'm sure supporting the typical WTP project structures would make seam-gen and the build script substantially more complex, and generally be a pita for the already-busy dev team. But this structure (web, java and ear projects for instance) is extremely common outside of seam projects. And trying to shoehorn current seam-gen's output into this structure is a bear - you're basically asking to spend a lot of time getting it to work again (unless you're a seam veteran). And after it works again, seam-gen's handy new-stuff tasks no longer put things in the "right" place. I think the above represents an adoption barrier to seam. I've been using the current seam-gen produced structure, and it works fine. But when I later go back to my client and try to convince them to consider seam, having an only-seam-projects-look-like-this structure will make it a hard sell. Sounds silly given how fantastic seam is. But it's also true. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4025645#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...